- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 12,162
- Reaction score
- 2,873
sometimes but damage and the way someone looks after the fight also has something to do with it
One of the biggest offenders of this was Hominick Vs Garcia. Garcia was making loud noises and throwing heaters all night swinging at air while getting utterly picked the f**k apart and one judge one awarded the fight for Garcia...one of the worst cards I've ever witnessed.
the best view is at the table cage side.
All the fights you listed were close and couldve gone either way. Takedowns should count but so should sub attemps. Plodding foward should not count but neither should running away. Judging a fight is tricky when you got 2 high level fighters scrapping and neither establishes dominace.
No. It's not and those put in those positions will tell you the same thing.
From a fan's perspective, you'll wanna be closer to the action and see it happen in front of you. However, it's not a good view, especially with the responsibility of judging the fight right there in front of you.
I think intent is too heavily judged in MMA.
A guy could miss 20 punches in a row, but if he looks mad and alpha while he throws, he usually is ahead on scorecards.
I think intent is too heavily judged in MMA.
A guy could miss 20 punches in a row, but if he looks mad and alpha while he throws, he usually is ahead on scorecards.
Bravo Sr.
Rampage vs Machida as an example.