We don’t share the widespread concern about yield curve inversion. Conceptually, an inverted curve means that the rates market is pricing future cuts that are large enough to outweigh the term premium (which accounts for the usual upward slope). In the past, this has generally only happened in situations when a recession was becoming clearly visible—hence the curve’s strong track record as a recession predictor. But three things are different about the current cycle. First, the term premium is well below its long-term average, so it takes fewer expected rate cuts to invert the curve. Second, there is a plausible path to Fed easing just on the back of lower inflation— in fact, both our and the FOMC’s non-recession projections call for more than 200bp of gradual cuts in the next 2-3 years. Third, if forecasters are overly pessimistic now, rates market investors — and thus the expectations priced into the yield curve — are probably also overly pessimistic. So the argument that the inverted curve validates the consensus forecast of a recession is circular, to say the least.