1. We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. For those experiencing login issues, a temporary solution is to clear your cache and cookies on your web browser. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
  2. The official Sherdog Store is back! Check it out! » Discuss it here! »

Director's who lost their touch

Discussion in 'Mayberry Lounge' started by Drain Bamage, Feb 2, 2020.

  1. Drain Bamage Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2017
    Messages:
    19,497
    Likes Received:
    7,487
    Location:
    USA
    William Friedkin
    John Landis
    Francis Ford Coppolla
    Brian De Palma
    The Wachowski Brothers
     
  2. sweetviolenturg Silver Belt Professional Fighter

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    14,498
    Likes Received:
    15,118
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    I was trying to think of anything that I enjoyed from any of this group pf filmmakers recently & the only thing that I came up with is Friedkin's KILLER JOE from 2011 or 2012. As unpleasant as it is, I think Friedkin did a good job with it & there are some great performances in it. In fact, while I'm thinking of it I believe I'll go order the unrated director's cut on Blu-ray.
     
  3. hillelslovak87 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2017
    Messages:
    39,180
    Likes Received:
    9,546
    You goddamn transphobe. It's the Wachowski SISTERS!!!!
     
  4. Nathan LaMontagne Amateur Fighter

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,921
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Location:
    Los Angeles, Ca
    Burton. Definitely Burton.
     
  5. Plissken Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Messages:
    17,984
    Likes Received:
    1,102
    Location:
    New England.
    Bug and Killer Joe were good films, not prime Friedkin, but for late entries they are good enough for his name to be taken off the list.
     
  6. moreorless87 Straba

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    45,851
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    Coppola definitely stands out as someone who became far too bland and commercial in the late 80's and 90's, Dracula did I spose have ambition even if it was a bit uneven but something like Jack? seems hard to believe this was the same man who made The Godfather, Apoc Now, Rumble Fish, etc.
    I could see this coming more though, Burton was I think mostly an entertainer right from the start so losing his edge over time wasn't that unexpected.

    Ridley Scott is one of the most lamentable ones, not so much that he's become a "bad" director, compared to the above two his latter work is mostly pretty good but Hollywood beat down the man who made The Duelists, Alien and Blade Runner pretty quickly, you still had some spark for Legend but since then I think he's been mostly a very skilled gun for hire.

    Had his career started say 5 years earlier I suspect we might have had a couple more classics out of him.
     
  7. Bacco Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Messages:
    14,923
    Likes Received:
    6,181
    Location:
    Italy
    Tim Burton, even if Dumbo has been surprising good

    Ridley Scott peaked with The Gladiator, then downward slope

    I don't even remember what Spielberg did recently
     
  8. I'm Shawn Spencer Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    2,681
    Likes Received:
    729
    Ridley Scot still did good with The Martian. That wasn't that long ago.
     
  9. moreorless87 Straba

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    45,851
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    He's had plenty of "good" films over the past 35 years, Gladiator, Black Hawk Down, Black Rain, Matchstick Men, etc and honestly even stuff like the Alien prequels were at least well made even if the scripts were crappy. The difference is early Ridley Scott was more than just a competent director for hire he was an auteur on the level of someone like Kubrick and Hollywood crushed that out of him.
     
  10. OverCoronavirus Pressure Mayberry = War Room, WR = OT. Shit. Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    62,855
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    5/7/89 Grateful Dead show, Frost amphitheatre
    I would say George Lucas but he might not have had much touch to start.
     
  11. HereticBD Plutonium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    60,803
    Likes Received:
    24,378
    Location:
    In the hearts and minds of everyone
    Spielberg lost his touch with the blockbusters. He should just permanently pivot to directing dramas.

    I'd say Neil Blomkamp, but he is more of a one hit wonder. He might never have actually had "it".

    The Farrely Brothers pretty much lost their funny bones. Just fucking trash after trash, after their initial big run.

    Duncan Jones is kind of in the same boat as Blomkamp. Came out swinging with "Moon" and "Source Code", and then fell off a cliff.
     
  12. Drain Bamage Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2017
    Messages:
    19,497
    Likes Received:
    7,487
    Location:
    USA
    Nah I dont agree with that. Scott doesnt even write his scripts how can he be an auteur like Kubrick?
     
  13. moreorless87 Straba

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    45,851
    Likes Received:
    7,498
    I wouldn't say being a writer is essential to being an auteur(Kubrick was generally adapting existing works with co writters) but the earlier version of Scott clearly had a big influence on the writing in his films, Fancher and Peoples were basically working to order when he picked up the script for Blade Runner.

    I think when you see the two of them talk about the film they realise that whilst they obviously had a lot of creative input it was basically Scott's film, I would argue it turned into a kind of existential drama as a reaction to his brothers death.
     
  14. HunterSdVa29 Respect, tho

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    37,297
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Location:
    29 Palms (from San Diego)
    i know he went to Prison, but McTiernan?

    Die Hard, Predator, Hunt for Red October, Die Hard w/ a Vengenace, 13th Warrior

    and then ended his career w/ Rollerball and Basic?
     
  15. Kuona Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2017
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mom's basement
    Quentin Tarantino.
     
  16. Drain Bamage Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2017
    Messages:
    19,497
    Likes Received:
    7,487
    Location:
    USA
    Kubrick is a true auteur who wrote or co-wrote every feature film he was involved in (except for Spartacus) and was deeply involved in all aspects of the productions, from the cinematography to the music to the editing.

    Ridley Scott doesn't have a single writing credit. And Ridley Scott has no signature visual style. He relies on his DP and his huge camera setups (6-12 cameras running simultaneously) to get the coverage needed.

    Furthermore, why does every Ridley Scott movie have multiple versions? Nearly every time a Ridley Scott movie comes out, there is an extended version that comes out later, and maybe a 3rd and 4th cut after that. That's not how auteurs work. That's how someone who can't make up their mind works and is trying to please everybody.

    Who goes back and re-edits their movie because people complain? Kubrick would tell the complainers to fuck off. Ridley is like "oh well let me re edit that for you!" - a true commercial directors mentality.

    It's a stretch to equate these two. Scott has always been a very commercially minded director. He made Prometheus and Alien Covenant specifically to try and appease fans wanting more backstory on Alien. Kubrick wouldn't fuck with these people.
     
  17. Gurglevox Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2019
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Burton and Spielberg. HEY STEVEN! NO ONE WANTS TO WATCH A MOVIE ABOUT ABRAHAM LINCOLN AND YOU DON'T EVEN SHOW HIM GETTING SHOT!
     
  18. Drain Bamage Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2017
    Messages:
    19,497
    Likes Received:
    7,487
    Location:
    USA
    Box Office:
    Lincoln earned $182,207,973 in North America from 2,293 theaters and $93,085,477 overseas for a total of $275,293,450, well exceeding its $65 million budget.

    Critical Acclaim:
    Lincoln received worldwide critical acclaim. The cast was notably lauded, especially Day-Lewis, Field, and Jones. The film currently holds an 89% approval rating on the review aggregate website Rotten Tomatoes, based on 274 reviews with an average rating of 7.98/10,[62] with the critical consensus "Daniel Day-Lewis characteristically delivers in this witty, dignified portrait that immerses the audience in its world and entertains even as it informs." On Metacritic, which assigns a rating out of 100 based on reviews from critics, the film has a score of 86 (out of 100) based on 44 reviews, indicating "universal acclaim", thus making it Spielberg's highest rated film on the site since Saving Private Ryan.

    Try again.
     
  19. PaleMoonlight Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,827
    Likes Received:
    616
    If Kubrick was still alive today - his movies wouldn’t get financed.

    scorsese said Irishman was rejected by studios for years because they knew it wouldn’t be profitable.
     
  20. PaleMoonlight Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,827
    Likes Received:
    616
    Lol at not getting his sarcasm.

     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.