Did Michael Bisping actually lose his eye or was this a joke?

KevinLee

✮ ✮ RICH KING LIVING IN JEI'S HEAD✮ ✮
@Brown
Joined
Sep 23, 2017
Messages
4,242
Reaction score
1,170
f2710bd5a9004951a844328f3fb41b73_xl.jpg

Was this a prank or did he actually lose his eye?
 
Last edited:
I wonder what happens if you type "Bisping Eye" into google.
 
He still has his eye ball from what I understand. He just has essentially a thick painted insert. If you watch him take it out it's not a ball. It looks like a really big and thick contact lens.
 
He still has his eye ball from what I understand. He just has essentially a thick painted insert. If you watch him take it out it's not a ball. It looks like a really big and thick contact lens.

Yeah, i think it's an ocular lens he wears for cosmetic purposes. I think his eye is still there though I have no idea how much vision he has left in it.
 
Not a joke. He still beat Anderson though embarrassingly
Lol- his eye was 95% when he squeaked by a slow and past it Anderson. He, personally, changed the entire middleweight landscape for years when he scurried away from the original sold out main event in London that night but it was ANDERSON SILVA( eye wink) - who could blame him.
 
Lol- his eye was 95% when he squeaked by a slow and past it Anderson. He, personally, changed the entire middleweight landscape for years when he scurried away from the original sold out main event in London that night but it was ANDERSON SILVA( eye wink) - who could blame him.
BispKing dominated that fight. The only time Silva landed anything noteworthy was the sneaky shot when he was asking for his mouthpiece. Silva is a drugs cheat and a cheap fighter
 
Last edited:
Wait when Bisping is saying you need 20/200 vision to get licensed to fight by the commission and he just barely made it, is he talking about the vision in his good eye or his dead eye? I'm confused.

I'm surprised that the commission would require a fighter to have two working eyes.
 
Did you actually watch the fight? Bisping got his ass kicked

Not really. Bisping was definitely winning that fight, no question. Anderson had one big moment when Bisping wanted to retrieve his mouthpiece.

Two things, though.

Anderson was clearly the vastly superior fighter in terms of skill who for some reason slow rolled most of the fight. Whenever he turned on the offence it was clear Bisping had no answer, he just didn't turn it on enough. It was oddly similar to the Diaz fight.

A younger Anderson would have executed any version of Bisping.
 
Not really. Bisping was definitely winning that fight, no question. Anderson had one big moment when Bisping wanted to retrieve his mouthpiece.

Two things, though.

Anderson was clearly the vastly superior fighter in terms of skill who for some reason slow rolled most of the fight. Whenever he turned on the offence it was clear Bisping had no answer, he just didn't turn it on enough. It was oddly similar to the Diaz fight.

A younger Anderson would have executed any version of Bisping.
He got worked that fight. His face was falling off by the end and i was totally confused how the judges gave him that fight. We can agree to disagree but from my perspective Bisping got his ass kicked
 
He got worked that fight. His face was off by the end and i was totally confused how the judges gave him that fight

Read my post again and accept it as truth, because that's what it is.

Fighters don't win on one flurry unless it actually ends the fight.
 
Back
Top