- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 62,002
- Reaction score
- 16,723
That sounds so much better than Miley.
Well, I'm not a monster, am I?
That sounds so much better than Miley.
Anytime a woman is compared to "an animal," that's Pharrell.
"Blurred Lines" is so Justin Timberlake's first album (which was inspired by Michael Jackson's OFF THE WALL and then can be argued was STOLEN!!!!!). The Gaye foundation made rumblings how the song was similar, so the Thicke camp pre-emtively sued them because fuck loose talk.
1. This song is pretty good.
2. The beat is kind of similar, but it would seem the main emphasis is the sweet guitar-face licks, which veer closer to Carlos Santana or Joe Satriani.
3. He uses a shit ton of simple musical layers. Like the first four layers is what you're talking about is similar to "Get Lucky," but that's kinda part and parcel with simple beats. With both "Get Lucky" and "Blurred Lines" they're using minimal elements, so stripped to the core many songs are going to sound similar. There's no sweet guitar face here.
4. Also, there's not enough this in the Korean "version":
I don't know what you call this beat, and certainly it's more exaggerated than in "Get Lucky," but this swagger is not at all present in the other. So to me the difference is pretty clear: Daft Punk = pop and this guy = jazz.
5. What exactly should be done? Is the argument "Get Lucky" somehow prevented this kid from leaving his bedroom? Has "Get Lucky" stood on the shoulders of this kid's vast Youtube cachet? I don't know how the philosophy no one should benefit from theft can be addressed.
6. Malcolm Gladwell on Plagiarism
as much as I dislike them for their past productions which were essentially just loops taken from 70` disco songs and sped up, I gotta say that you cant say this is a ripoff.
Its a similar chord progression and it ends there. It would be something on a level of one painter suing another cause he drew trees like he did.
Holy shit, I just put "Zack Kim" into Google translate, it came out "Get Lucky".
One does not have to have a PHD in statistics to realize a pretty simple chord progression, even with a similar vibe, is likely to crop up multiple times in different songs. It's virtually impossible to do something completely original. Every chord progression has pretty much been done already, in all different styles and tempos.
That Daft Punk somehow found this, among all of the vastness that is the internet, and intentionally decided to "rip him off" also strikes me as quite unlikely.
At any rate, the dude is getting a lot of free publicity now.
Holy shit, I just put "Zack Kim" into Google translate, it came out "Get Lucky".
What if a famous French painter took a poor Chinese boys painting of trees, stuck his name on it and sold it for billions?
That Daft Punk somehow found this, among all of the vastness that is the internet, and intentionally decided to "rip him off" also strikes me as quite unlikely.
At any rate, the dude is getting a lot of free publicity now.
you make it sound like daft punk just slapped their logo on that korean guitarists video.
The song was called "Robot Dance". Many, including Pharrell, call Daft Punk "The Robots". That narrows it down a little.
Yeah, maybe he can finally take his Super Mario bit on the road.
Narrows it down to what? Daft Punk searching the web for contrived pseudonyms? I mean, I've heard of googling yourself, but that's just on another level of narcissism.