D
Deleted member 571517
Guest
The judging was subjective and apparently we were left with what the actual judges had wrote on scorecard.Judges scorecards are opinions from a skewed perspective. It's the equivalent of taking 3 sherdoggers and asking them to score a fight. With the amount of fights fucked up by judges you should learn to trust your eyes. Anyway you want to score this fight usman wins. Round by round, look at the output and damage each round Usman wins, Pressure/Octagon control? Usman had more of that throughout the fight too. The stats agree with me. The broken jaw agrees with me. The finish agrees with me. And Usman's near flawless face after the fight (no homo) agrees with me. It just seems like a bunch of shattered egos trying to make something out of nothing. People say Colby won "X" round, but when I ask to explain it, they can't. Even in the round where Colby out struck Usman, Usman still landed more damaging blows backing up Colby. And every round after that matched colby's pace WHILE doing damage, and absolutely obliterated him the last round. He did exactly what he said he was going to do prior to the fight. It was a masterclass by Usman, no where near close.
The judges can accuse that our perspective were biased as much as we can accuse the judges as bias.
Sometimes I wish our opinion on the fight matters too, but what that happened was Usman winning by TKO with only 50 seconds left in the 5th round at 4:10 with judges scored the fight as 3-1, 2-2, 1-3.