Wrote, recorded and edited this in a mad rush. Usually I don't post stuff from my YouTube channel here because I'm a loser and you'd all make fun of me, but I thought this particular video might interest you all.
I'd be interested in your thoughts! Particularly those with more knowledge on karate than me
@AshiharaFan,
@Azam,
@shinkyoku @Tayski
Just watched the video now. I think you were pretty fair with your assessment. I did disagree with a few things though:
1) You mentioned that WKF & JKA Karate doesn't produce fighters adept at real fighting. I partially disagree with this. I think it's very problematic to come away with that conclusion if you're basing it off watching Karate Combat. It's a new unfamiliar rule set for most of those competing. I think in general that's a problematic assessment. I think the JKA & even the WKF does produce fighters that are adept at fighting (like Aghayev executing those perfect throws that are part of the shotokan syllabus for example) - you might have a point if we're talking about specific combat sports like kickboxing/MT but I don't think it holds true for MMA (you used this in the Lyoto Machida example).
The JKA & WKF arguably teach the most important parts of fighting: distance control, timing, footwork & speed. The problem like you said is that fights usually don't stop after you score a point - therein lies the problem. This is why I partially agree with you. I would add though that competition rule sets are what make these fighters not so adept (at first) but I will stress that you could apply the same to kickboxing or MT (if you're drawing a comparison between MMA or kickboxing/MT like you did with Karate & MMA). If you're drawing comparisons you can say the same for almost all striking arts including boxing, kickboxing or MT - they each have their gaps. My point being is we don't necessarily use that reasoning to change boxing, kickboxing or MT. I think in this case it depends on what the organizers want - what their goal is. I think it's hard to draw conclusions from combat sports - I mean if it was a self defense scenario and you couldn't hit the guy - I'd say he's pretty adept at fighting. If you could clarify what you meant - it might help me understand where you are coming from, as their might be something that I've overlooked.
2) You mentioned Lyoto Machida in MMA. I agree that he's able to adapt his Karate to real fighting precisely because he's able to take techniques/styles/applications outside of Karate - to fill the areas that his Karate training hasn't prepared him for. I will add though that his approach was pretty much still from the shotokan hand book. For most of his career he's avoided inside fighting - what has allowed him to do so are applications/techniques found in Karate (knees & distance control) and outside of it (clinch, under/over, framing etc). I'd add as well that the vast chunk of his striking repertoire is from the JKA shotokan handbook - his footwork, combinations, trips/throws, distance control, sense of timing etc - the reason I mention this is because of what you said earlier that JKA & WKF doesn't produce fighters adept at real fighting. This is why I disagreed because Machida is adept with the stuff he has learnt from JKA Karate - he applies it to real fighting. Any JKA or WKF fighter can - it involves sparring full contact though & adapting your tool-set to deal with the new competition rule set.
3) The last part where you said that point fighting Karate techniques/rule-set are archaic & don't work for modern fighting - huge disagreement here lol.
The fundamentals of point fighting transfer to every combat sport. This is why there are such a multitude of top tier MMA fighters with point fighting backgrounds. A lot of these point fighters still make use of the same stance, same combinations, same distance control, same footwork etc in MMA. IMHO I think point fighting transfers better to MMA than knockdown karate. Distance control, timing & speed are hallmarks of point fighting - these are important fundamentals in fighting period. If I had to choose between point fighting or knockdown karate for MMA - I'd hands down pick point fighting.
I think trying to compare Karate to K1 or kickboxing is the problem. Karate doesn't have to become kickboxing or MT to be effective. What it does need is a rule set that is more realistic than the one it currently has & that can make use of all the tools available in the Karate handbook.