• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

DC vs 1996 Mark Coleman?

Fadetoblack918

Fadetoblack918

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
2,936
Reaction score
492
Who takes it?

I go DC. I don't think Mark is stopping a takedown from Cormier.
 
DC is a better wrestler, Marc Coleman stand up kinda s*ck.


Not even close.

New school Vs old school.

Old school always lose.
 
Sonny Qc said:
DC is a better wrestler, Marc Coleman stand up kinda s*ck.


Not even close.

New school Vs old school.

Old school always lose.
Click to expand...

Not always, I think prime Kerr beats Derrick Lewis, Roy Nelson, Matt mitrione, etc
 
Ken's Sideburns said:
Not always, I think prime Kerr beats Derrick Lewis, Roy Nelson, Matt mitrione, etc
Click to expand...

You can't go by Kerr. He was the biggest juice monkey of all time. which was proven. Even a documentary on his steroid abuse and other drugs. A clean kerr would get killed by lewis. And kerr never went to the top. he was always a mid tier fighter.
 
Coleman couldn't stand with DC for 30 seconds without being KO'd.
 
Lol. Cormier would knock him out in two minutes.
 
DC would woop that ass. Way better hands and the ability to finish the fight via submission
 
Sonny Qc said:
DC is a better wrestler, Marc Coleman stand up kinda s*ck.


Not even close.

New school Vs old school.

Old school always lose.
Click to expand...
Michael Bisping vs Rockhold

Lawler vs Rory

People just fall out of their primes at points.
 
I don't know man. That era was the steroids era. It would be 70% DC 30% Coleman but off the juice would be 85% DC and 15% Coleman.
 
Sonny Qc said:
DC is a better wrestler, Marc Coleman stand up kinda s*ck.


Not even close.

New school Vs old school.

Old school always lose.
Click to expand...
I would generally agree with this but HW I feel like has a lot of exceptions. Theres guys like Rizzo, Sergei, Tom Erikson, 03 Mirko etc who could do work to a lot of the UFC roster.
 
bigconan said:
You can't go by Kerr. He was the biggest juice monkey of all time. which was proven. Even a documentary on his steroid abuse and other drugs. A clean kerr would get killed by lewis. And kerr never went to the top. he was always a mid tier fighter.
Click to expand...
Kerr was the top rated fighter in the world going into pride grand pri. Kerr was a takedown machine.
 
DC would murder Coleman of that era. You can't compare champs of today to those guys. Mark had no stand up and horrible cardio.
 
Better question: Juiced to the gullet, prime Randleman vs Cormier. Who slams who?
 
It's funny how ppl always say 'DC is a better wrestler' in whenever this topic comes up

Mark Coleman: 1x World silver medallist (lost to a Soviet wrestling machine)
DC: 1x World bronze medallist (lost to a Russian wrestling machine)

IMO Coleman at his best is better at wrestling.

in a title fight in MMA DC has better standup and cardio though.
 
hm gotta love these rhetorical hype posts... who would hypothetically win: a guy with advanced knowledge in an advanced level of a sport or a guy with limited knowledge of a fledgling new sport.. if they competed in the same sport....

new guard beats old guard /thread
generations succeed their predecessors
civilization and technology progress
the world moves on to bigger and better things.
 
If Coleman was in a his prime today with modern training and nutrition, then it could be competitive.

Teleport today's DC to meet Coleman in 1996 and he keeps it standing and knocks Mark out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,256,593
Messages
56,786,318
Members
175,405
Latest member
crabik

Share this page

Back
Top