Crime DC Police chief resigns after caught altering crime data

[Soggust]

Shocker, I remember this thread and the convos in it ..

I stand by my take

The critique wasn't that stats couldn't possibly be manipulated, but rather that the correct response obviously isn't sending in the national guard over anecdotes.

And if the rebuttal is that "It wasn't anecdotes. Crime was out of control to such a degree that this was the only appropriate response, we just couldn't prove it because of the Chief's corruption", then surely, we would be talking about criminal charges for her, right?

Instead, they said this 'corruption' didn't rise to the level of a crime. The republican-led committee actual provided no examples or even claims of direct statistic manipulation. They claim a general policy emphasis based upon the testimony of senior officers (which I actually believe to be true, btw). But even assuming that is the case, it still doesn't prove an emergency.

Therefore, I think the normal response would be to replace her, not send in the fuckin national guard lol.

 

[Rational Poster]

All Western countries are doing this. Sweden claims their murder rate hasn't increased over the past 30 years but anyone paying any amount of attention to what's going on there knows that's bullshit.

What are they doing with all the extra dead bodies?

 

[Tatra]

What are they doing with all the extra dead bodies?

What?

 

[Rational Poster]

What?

You said they're lying about the murder rate. That would imply there are dead bodies not being counted. Murder is a specific crime that produces one dead body.

So what are they doing with the extra dead bodies?

 

[The Big Yin]

Remember comrade, we don't want the data correct, we want it politically correct.

 

[Paynebringer]

Wasn't the whole point of Trump calling in the National Guard to bring the crime down? Now they are upset that possible crime stat fixing in their favour is a problem?

 

[Tatra]

You said they're lying about the murder rate. That would imply there are dead bodies not being counted. Murder is a specific crime that produces one dead body.

So what are they doing with the extra dead bodies?

Not counting them. Are you retarded?

 

[Rational Poster]

Not counting them. Are you retarded?

So what do they do with the bodies they're not counting?

 

[Tatra]

So what do they do with the bodies they're not counting?

They bury/cremate them, like the others. Still being retarded, I see.

 

[Thrawn33]

You said they're lying about the murder rate. That would imply there are dead bodies not being counted. Murder is a specific crime that produces one dead body.

So what are they doing with the extra dead bodies?

..or there are dead bodies not being counted as murders. Accidental deaths, missing persons, negligent homicides, not guilty verdicts, not enough evidence to bring to trial therefore no "murder".

 

[Kung Fu Kowboy]

Wouldn't they want to show more crime so they could get more funding?

The good old pump and dump...

 

[Rational Poster]

They bury/cremate them, like the others. Still be retarded, I see.

So people are getting killed and they're just getting rid of the bodies and none of their relatives care? Any evidence of this?

 

[Rational Poster]

..or there are dead bodies not being counted as murders. Accidental deaths, negligent homicides, not guilty verdicts, not enough evidence to bring to trial therefore no "murder".

This is more reasonable, and could easily be easily proven or disprove by looking at the stats for those types of events.

 

[Tatra]

So people are getting killed and they're just getting rid of the bodies and none of their relatives care? Any evidence of this?

When did I say that? Making stuff up. They're simply not recording the murders. It wouldn't need to include getting rid of bodies Mafia-style. How hard is that for you to understand?

 

[Rational Poster]

When did I say that? Making stuff up. They're simply not recording the murders. It wouldn't need to include getting rid of bodies Mafia-style. How hard is that for you to understand?

How do you not record a dead body that exists and has been discovered?

 

[Tatra]

How do you not record a dead body that exists and has been discovered?

I am talking about the statistics that are released to the public you moron. They are lies.

 

[Rational Poster]

I am talking about the statistics that are released to the public you moron. They are lies.

You are talking about statistics that require one dead body to exist first.

 

[Thrawn33]

This is more reasonable, and could easily be easily proven or disprove by looking at the stats for those types of events.

It's really how they're counting them.

I mean you had a website counting a suicide by gun after-hours in a school parking lot as a "school shooting" so it's not much of a stretch for someone to massage data and "acktullay...it's not really a murder since there was no arrest made, and we're only counting convicted murders...because innocent until proven guilty"


On the other hand:
It's also a murder rate (per capita) so is also possible as the population goes up so do the amount of reportable murders, but the per capita rate remains near constant even though theres more crimes occuring.

 

[Tatra]

You are talking about statistics that require one dead body to exist first.

I am talking about statistics that are released to the public. They can easily be edited to keep up the lie that diversity is working in Sweden. Carry on playing dumb.

 

[Paynebringer]

They bury/cremate them, like the others. Still being retarded, I see.

So, is it only victims with no family, friends, or witnesses that are being buried/cremated in unmarked graves, I would assume?