So what source do you want me to share with you yo make you happy?
The FDA and Pfizer hired a team of attys to fight this. But they can't hire people to review the information? To add, they had to review this information before approving it. They took 180 days to do so but now it's gotta take 55 years? Cmon guy seriously? You can't see what's going on here. Why did two heads of the FDA vaccine program quit during all of this? We still haven't been told why. If anyone has any common sense I'd think they would come to their own conclusions that it wasn't because they both just wanted a new line if work.
The site I posted was from the actual atty that made this happen. That took the FDA and Pfizer to court and won. He's a well known vaccine atty and obviously knows what he's doing or he wouldn't have won to get the documents released in 8 months instead of the 55 years they wanted. Also are you even aware of what the first 500 pages from Pfizer that they had to release said? In the first two and a half months of roll out they had so many issues they had to hire more people to follow the vaccine injured and had 1200 people die. These are their documents not some numbers I'm pulling out my butt.
Look you can down play and try to slander the atry all you want. I'm sorry you don't want to know the facts in the data. It really amazes me people like you will defend Pfizer and the FDA that has now funded a TEAM of attys to fight the release of information. You're just a shill for big pharma.
Yes, with any FOIA request, they review documents to insure they are releasing relevant information to the request, and are not releasing information that is not being asked for. That's how those work. That you seem to think reviewing documents to see if they are what is being asked for, as nefarious, shows a fundamental ignorance.
So does acting like it's normal for any government agency to have to dedicate dozens of workers, full time, for months, for any one person's FOIA request.
Pfizer can't hire anyone to process a FOIA request, as Pfizer is not a government agency, and not subject to the FOIA. The FDA can't just hire people to respond to a single FOIA request, because they are only allowed to spend according to what Congress first puts into and passes in a budget, and then what Congress approves to be spent from that budget by an appropriation.
I'm not defending Pfizer. Pointing out that you post, entirely, bullshit has 100% to do with the bullshit you swallow, and 0% to do with Pfizer.
Context matters. Again. 1200 deaths as adverse events do not mean that 1200 deaths were caused by the vaccine. This is the same idiotic claim that people make about the VAERS numbers.
There is NOTHING to indicate that 1200 deaths were caused by the vaccines. Indeed, even though people like you have made the same fraudulent claims about thousands of deats reported to VAERS, there are only 9 which have been found to have been caused by all the vaccines, as of December, last year, and they identified the issue with the J&J vaccine and know how to spot the problem and intervene.
So, in the USA, grand total, 9 deaths caused by all vaccines, combined, but 1200 by Pfizer, worldwide, in the first three months, even though the USA had the highest number of adverse events reported? What doesn't add up? Well, since you're claiming the numbers say something they absolutely don't, much like you do with the partial out of context quotes you like to trot out, it's not surprising that your claims don't align with reality.
9 deaths. That's it. For all the covid vaccines.
But, just for shits and giggles, lets pretend that all those death events were caused by the Pfizer vaccine, which they weren't (it mentions that in the same document where you get the number from) -
1200 deaths.
29,400,000 doses administered by 2/28/2021.
Death rate from the vaccine = 0.0041%
4.1 per 100,000 doses.
This is what they're supposedly trying to hide? Again, there weren't 1200 deaths CAUSED BY the vaccine. Again, GTFO with that nonsense.
It doesn't matter that they have thousands of employees who get paid millions and millions to go and, say, inspect the operations of a drug manufacturer, or who have to review the actual safety studies. None of those people are tasked with responding to FOIA requests. They have other full-time duties for all the food and drug jobs that have to be done by the FDA. The judge who ordered them to speed this up agreed that the request was "unduly burdensome."
And let's be clear, him getting a judge to say "Yes, you need to produce documents more quickly to respond to this FOIA request" is in no way, shape or form any kind of validation of his claims. He makes statements about vaccines and statements made by the CDC or other bodies, and links to them, and, much like your links, they don't say what he claims they do.
He's full of shit. But if you have hundreds of thousands of pages, there will plenty there for idiots to misrepresent, just like you did with just the first 500, which is the entire point of this exercise.
