- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 23,935
- Reaction score
- 49,468
How many were for Snoop?
Dana White reacts to Logan Paul vs. Mayweather match-up: 'This is the state of boxing right now'
- Thread starter TCE
- Start date
No, it’s not. One is an accomplished professional fighter who knocks other fighters out for a living. The other lost his only fight to a youtuber.
Both may be mismatches in the end but they are not close to the same thing.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
An exhibition match did better than 99% of the UFC's PPV. That is a terrible look for the UFC. But keep on shill. Keep explaining why that isn't a bad look for the UFC when it can't sell any PPVs any bigger than that.
Your CTE is very comical. You can't grasp that some scrub sport like Indian Premier Cricket League can generate more revenue than the UFC, which shows just how tiny the UFC is compared to legit sports. Now the cricket league isn't even a major sport, which is why I'm using them as a comparison. Your little pea brain getting this? If I used one of the major sports, like the NBA, MLB, NHL, NFL, soccer, tennis, golf, etc, then you will see that the UFC is even more inferior. The Indian cricket league is comparable because that is something maybe one day Dana and the UFC can over come in revenue generation. I doubt it will happen anytime soon but maybe one day he can step up to the minor leagues, Dr Shill. FYI, you need to get your CTE checked out because you are about stupid as can be or just a 100% UFC shill. So which is it, you just stupid as fuck or a shill?
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
Guess thats why no body wanted to pay to watch a wet blanket like yourself. LOLMAO
Lol. What the fuck does that even mean?
It did better than 99% of all boxing ppv’s and is among the highest selling of all time. Is this sinking in for you?
So you’re telling me one org that puts on about 40 shows a year has less revenue than leagues with 30+ franchises that have hundreds to thousands of events a year..........
Again, why are you posting on a ufc forum?
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 1,866
- Reaction score
- 1,620
Less next time, if the people that complaints about his commentary were the majority.
- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 9,617
- Reaction score
- 10,032
If its a terrible look for the UFC its a worse look for boxing, Not sure how you arent getting that?
Boxing has put out 5 PPVs this year, assuming Spence/Garcia does around 400k it would make the total combined buys around 3.6m. Nearly half of that comes from two men in their 50s having an exhibition bout + a youtuber vs an NBA player. Meanwhile the UFC is about to put out its 11th PPV of the year this weekend, the top 5 alone generated around 4.4m buys - no 50 years olds or Youtubers involved.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2020
- Messages
- 884
- Reaction score
- 520
So much stuff to debunk but who has the time for this lol
- whoever thinks the Spence fight does 500k needs some help cuz this fght was just for hardcore fans
- the mike fight sold at least 2 million (it's 1. 6 million right now and the real number needs more weeks)
- numbers cant be verified independently anymore aka ESPN deal sucks if you want to know the real numbers
What we have learned is that Conor was never on grandpa Tyson's level.
- whoever thinks the Spence fight does 500k needs some help cuz this fght was just for hardcore fans
- the mike fight sold at least 2 million (it's 1. 6 million right now and the real number needs more weeks)
- numbers cant be verified independently anymore aka ESPN deal sucks if you want to know the real numbers
What we have learned is that Conor was never on grandpa Tyson's level.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
Its a worse look for boxing by posting bigger PPV numbers than 99% of the UFC's PPV? Ok bub, keep thinking that.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
God damn you UFC shills. A boxing exhibition match generated more buys than 100% of the UFC PPV (since you saying it did better than 99% of boxing ppv's, so I'm going to round up like you is be). Only 1 UFC PPV did better and plenty more than just 1 has done better in boxing Dr Shill.
Also who is the dumbass slimy cocksucker who is proclaiming the UFC to be bigger than soccer, so that would have to include cricket? Also how pathetic is it for the UFC to not be able to generate more revenue than an Indian cricket league? LOL What is even worse, is being a shill for the UFC despite its low level, but you is be a low level fighter so it makes sense. I also get it that you need those reebok coupons to get some xmas gifts. Good luck with that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2020
- Messages
- 884
- Reaction score
- 520
Who cares? It makes no sense to compare two different business models and even before the ESPN deal numbers weren't 100% right and the ESPN deal made everything worse (if you really want to know the real number)
- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 9,617
- Reaction score
- 10,032
At this point I feel like you're just arguing for the sake of it. Would you be defending the UFC if half of their entire years total PPV buys came from Shaq vs Hulk Hogan and then the rest of the year boxing was going to PPV much more often and doing better average numbers with actual legitimate fights? because thats essentially this situation in reverse.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
Thats fine but you gotta remember that slimy cocksucker Dana started the comparisons. Not to mention one of the first UFC fighters was a one gloved boxer. Also get off your high horse, we are talking about prize fighting here. Who gives a fuck about the 'business model'? You must be about completely brainwashed to care about that shit. Also what business model do you see from the UFC and boxing that is so different? LOL
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
No I don't give a fuck about PPV numbers but the returds on here seem to spout it out on the reg. Mostly they are fans of losers like Conor which they only talk about the off the cage stuff since what happens in the cage isn't worth talking about since they suck. Thats why they resort to PPV buys like they get some cut or something, lol. Kflo is an obvious shill so I'm sure he gets some kick backs if nothing but Reebok coupons.
But you have to admit it is a very bad look for the UFC when a competitor gets more PPV's than 99.9999999% of the UFC's off a boxing exhibition match. LOL
- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 9,617
- Reaction score
- 10,032
This is an ironic statement considering 90% of boxing fanboy arguments these days are based around how much boxers get paid.
you are a clueless fool who doesn't even know what you're arguing. tyson jones (and jake paul) did well selling what they did. congrats to them. it was good to see tyson in the ring after 15 years away since he was stopped by a journeyman. but he's tyson. people like him now, and he did a good job selling his "comeback" through media and social media. good on him. but it's only retards like you who seem to need to make that somehow a reflection on anything else other than people wanting to see mike back in the ring. your loathing of the sport that you're posting on a message board about seems to be deep. look inside yourself grasshopper. what is fueling your self loathing?
also, the tyson fight was only distributed globally through ppv. no local cable deals. the ppv number is the global reach. it was a discounted price of 49.99. and the audience demographic is less likely to stream than ufc fans. but yes, it was a success for tyson for sure. congrats to him.
but only a legit hater or self loathing loser would then look to use that to put down other events and sports. that's you. lol..
how pathetic is it for the ufc to generate less revenue than a cricket league???? lol. how retarded do you have to be to think a comparison means anything to anyone? and newsflash for you retard.....cricket is huge in india (a large country) and is a big sport in other pockets of the world.
and lol at haters still grasping at a bad comment 10 years ago that had nothing to do with revenue.....
it sounds like you're gloating that the ufc doesn't generate more revenue or isn't worth more in value. it's just bizarre behavior for "fans" like you to come on message boards dedicated to discussion of the sport and the ufc to gloat about things like this. it's almost like someone has to be paying you to do this, because it's not normal. are you not getting sufficient attention from mommy?
and my username has nothing to do with a fighter.......
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2005
- Messages
- 5,251
- Reaction score
- 663
They are also making more money than current boxers.
that’s concerning for the sport.
shertards keep talking about building new talent and this is exactly what happens when you don’t replace old talent with new talent.
The geriatrics pull in bigger numbers than the youngsters.
boxing might not be dying but it’s definitely going backwards.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 505
So thats where all the Conor fangirls came from?
