Sounds like there's more to the story, perhaps it was someone else's fault but Ottman took the fall?
"Its better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one."
The "more" to the story is just a bunch of ridiculous lies.
Go look up all of the stories about how his brother spent a year harassing the staff at Sherdog and Tapology trying to get a DQ loss removed from his record with a bunch of ridiculous excuses about how it didn't actually happen despite the fact that there was video of the event.
Those dudes are clowns.
Chances are he fucked up and got burned for it.Chances are he signed some type of non-disclosure agreement so he won't be able to give his version of the story for a while
Sounds like there's more to the story, perhaps it was someone else's fault but Ottman took the fall?
"Its better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one."
can you elaborate?Someone with his past never should have been in the UFC in the first place.
more accurately, its essentially saying that its better for a guilty man to go free than an innocent man to be locked up. its a statement of mercy over wrathHow asinine. Saving a guilty man is better than condemning an innocent one? They’re both bad no matter how you try to rationalize it.
That’s like saying “I’mma save that dude who shot up the building but let that other innocent guy take the fall”
If you're trying to win some fans you could probably pick a better picture than trying to look menacing while stepping into some Delorean looking car.
Not sure if that fucker is innocent though.I can only assume there was a really small innocent person in the bag.
The Ottoman Empire will rise again.
Do you think we'll see him in bellator or do you see him going to one fc?
No it's a pretty basic principle of the US criminal justice system. That's why the burden of proof is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, because it's better for a guilty man to go free than for an innocent man to be convicted.How asinine. Saving a guilty man is better than condemning an innocent one? They’re both bad no matter how you try to rationalize it.
That’s like saying “I’mma save that dude who shot up the building but let that other innocent guy take the fall”