- Joined
- Sep 17, 2009
- Messages
- 25,820
- Reaction score
- 1,556
So. .. if you don't have that "legacy", then it is no biggie to believe in racial superiority?
Racism has 1001 meanings. I's hard to keep up with honestly.
It may be a case of scope creep.
So. .. if you don't have that "legacy", then it is no biggie to believe in racial superiority?
So. .. if you don't have that "legacy", then it is no biggie to believe in racial superiority?
Racism has 1001 meanings. I's hard to keep up with honestly.
It may be a case of scope creep.
Ted Nugent and Rush Limbaugh would make good minority outreach ambassadors for the repubican party.
Exactly^ I can't believe that people in this day and age still buy into "they're lazy, no-good, drug taking" stereotype. What you see plastered all over Fox "news" isn't reality. It's just control to get you to vote a certain way so that they stay in power and keep the money. Go out and speak to people and you'll see what's up.
Ted Nugent and Rush Limbaugh would make good minority outreach ambassadors for the repubican party.
No one showed up because there wasn't any taxpayer funded freebies to give away...
Typical true to form answer you'd expect and one of the reasons why so few minorities vote republican.
Keep money they earned? I hate how presidential elections have turned into which Santa will bring me more goodies.
Because of tax payer funded freebies?
Or maybe, JUST MAYBE, citizens expect their politicians to fight for what is in their interest. You know, like, the government serving the people and whatnot.
Right. And their interests include taking money from one person and giving it to another. Tax payer funded freebies in other words. Some tax payer funded programs are necessary and I definitely support a social safety net but I really don't think we should be voting based on personal gain.
I think Ben Franklin said something about that once.
The left is so race conscious its ridiculous
You're pathetic. That was the most blatant underhanded welfare crack aimed at minorities and you're conveniently playing dumb about it.
Racialized oppression (ideological and/or repressive) backed by institutional power.
That would be my definition, in a pinch.
Well that's the confusing part though. Each person has their own definition.
The left is so race conscious its ridiculous
True and fair enough.
I do happen to be an expert on the subject, however, and my definition is based not just on my opinion, but on a history of definitions developed by other experts in critical race studies.
Hard for slaves to escape the current welfare state plantation which grants minorities privileges over white people, because they aren't as good enough obviously which is why the are there in the first place, for the several things they get accommodated for just being a minority. Hooray affirmative action- another welfare policy for minorities.
I think that's a silly question meant to divert and dumb down the real issue.
I wouldn't say "it's no biggie." It's more up to people to analyze in what context it might be meaningful.
What I will say is that white male feelings are the most privileged subjective space in the US. The minute a white male feels threatened by anything, he immediately skips over centuries of continued and present privilege and goes straight into victimizing himself to extremes unheard of in human history. I don't think chattel slaves in the U.S. 19th century thought of themselves as victims to the extreme that the white male in America does.
I'm dead serious. And I've actually spent hundreds of hours researching slave narratives and letters.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it.