Cowboy cerrone with racist comments again ...

[CreatureCore]

Not all, but pretty much all the ones we need to worry about are.

Considering there have been more killings since 9/11 by right wing/christian extremist groups in this country then muslim killings i don't think thats the case.

 

[Wayweary]

I can't remember the exact source but hes not a real cowboy. His parents are doctors or something. He is some kinda spoiled middle class rich kid

How does one become a "real" cowboy? And how is one both middle class and a rich kid at the same time? I doubt anything that is filtered through you can be trusted as solid information. I know he wasn't born on the ranch or anything but that is the life style that he gravitated towards from a young age.

 

[GoldenGloryFan]

Everyone is racist, it's human nature. And Cerrone is probably a good guy, he just doesn't think enough before he speaks sometimes.

No it is not human nature and no not everyone is racist, that is one of the dumbest statements I have ever heard, you must truly be a moron to believe what you have just said.

 

[SherdogFan23]

This statement is openly prejudice and xenophobic.

Care to elaborate? No muslim has caused me ill in my lifetime. The US has made it their mission to establish military bases in the ME, secure oil and pipeline routes and their propaganda system has made you believe that Muslims (people spanning over dozens of countries different interpretations of a religious document) are the problem.

I suppose you are also one of the ones that believe the 911 attacks never occurred.

Actually the "propaganda" of the current administration is in the opposite direction. A person who was a known Muslim kills numerous people on a military base in the name of his religion and the current administration doesn't call it a terrorist action. Terrorists kill people at a consulate in Africa and the US Government says it wasn't terrorists. It was just a bunch of people angry about a video. Since then evidence has found that the State department knew it WAS a terrorist action but chose to lie about it. Those events by the current administration are propaganda as well.

If you are from the USA, how about all of your tax dollars that have been spent on Homeland Security and actions to stop terrorists. While you may not have been impacted directly, the economy of this country and your local area has been impacted. It has affected your lifetime whether you realize it or not.

 

[SherdogFan23]

Considering there have been more killings since 9/11 by right wing/christian extremist groups in this country then muslim killings i don't think thats the case.

No. Name them.

 

[Wayweary]

Well. Just listened to the podcast.

1: Fucking a, yeah, Cowboy is an asshole. Clearly. Gets hyper-defensive and insists that he can't be racist because one of his employees is black. Lmao. And openly admits to the shit that Greene accused him of (but it looks like he knows he is a dick, at least) Who cares though, the guy is one of the best fighters we have. Let him say whatever he wants outside of the ring.

2: Fucking christ the hosts are retards. Adam, you are a decent comic but holy fuck you knead to shut the fuck up about all the ass you've never gotten. The whole living vicariously through the sexual conquests of the guys you interview is fucking weird. Knock it off. Plus the educated crowd is going to be put off by that degree of misogyny. I've never seen your act, but holy shit do you come across as a virgin 14 year old in that too?

Are you attempting parody? It's MMA Roasted. He doesn't "knead" to do anything. It's not meant to be PC so you can stuff the whining about "misogyny" you know where.

And yeah, he's close friends with guys that are black. That wouldn't have to be mentioned if people weren't so quick to throw around the racism card these days. And if you try to defend yourslef? Whelp, that's racist too. For fuck's sake, grow up.

 

[CreatureCore]

No. Name them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.

Add the 5 killed in the last attack and its up to 31 for the muslim radicals.

The difference is the news down plays any killings by white extremists. It doesnt make the news. It doesnt sell. Plus you would have fox and their brain washed 72 year old audience going crazy that people are trying to blame all right wingers for the attacks.

The reality both the Islamist and Christian terrorists are right wing extremists. The only difference is they believe two different versions of a fairy tale.

Oh and to add to that in a survey of police officers through out the country the group they worry about most is not muslims but right wing extremists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html
"74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism."

 

[Wayweary]

Considering there have been more killings since 9/11 by right wing/christian extremist groups in this country then muslim killings i don't think thats the case.

Even if that were so, and I don't think it is, it says absolutely nothing about the issue of Islam and terrorism. The problem is not rooted in the US, obviously, nor do Muslims make up much of the population of the US. You want cold, hard facts about what happens when Muslim population levels reach a majority in a country? Go look into it with open eyes. You end up with religious war with the eventual lowering of non-Muslim populations to near zero through persecution, murder and the mass exodus of the survivors. The Middle East used to have a lot more Christians than it does now and the history of what happened to them isn't pretty.

 

[Wayweary]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.

Add the 5 killed in the last attack and its up to 31 for the muslim radicals.

The difference is the news down plays any killings by white extremists. It doesnt make the news. It doesnt sell. Plus you would have fox and their brain washed 72 year old audience going crazy that people are trying to blame all right wingers for the attacks.

The reality both the Islamist and Christian terrorists are right wing extremists. The only difference is they believe two different versions of a fairy tale.

Oh and to add to that in a survey of police officers through out the country the group they worry about most is not muslims but right wing extremists.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html
"74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism."

This sort of comparison is presenting it as a dichotomy between Jihadist terrorism and all other forms of terrorism. If such a comparison is even close at all, it means that a large proportion of all terrorism is Jihadist in nature. And this is true in a country with only a small minority of Muslim residents. Do you care to imagine what the figures would look like if you put forward this data on a per capita basis?

And convenient that this is "since 9/11." What happens when you include 9/11? Suddenly, I think the vast majority of victims of terrorist attacks are due to Jihadist violence. Hrm... And what happens when you expand your scope to around the world? Again, it doesn't compare favorably at all.

 

[Pseudo Sane]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.

Add the 5 killed in the last attack and its up to 31 for the muslim radicals.

The difference is the news down plays any killings by white extremists. It doesnt make the news. It doesnt sell. Plus you would have fox and their brain washed 72 year old audience going crazy that people are trying to blame all right wingers for the attacks.

The reality both the Islamist and Christian terrorists are right wing extremists. The only difference is they believe two different versions of a fairy tale.

Oh and to add to that in a survey of police officers through out the country the group they worry about most is not muslims but right wing extremists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html
"74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism."

Today I learned that white=right wing=Christian.

Cool beans.

 

[CreatureCore]

Even if that were so, and I don't think it is, it says absolutely nothing about the issue of Islam and terrorism. The problem is not rooted in the US, obviously, nor do Muslims make up much of the population of the US. You want cold, hard facts about what happens when Muslim population levels reach a majority in a country? Go look into it with open eyes. You end up with religious war with the eventual lowering of non-Muslim populations to near zero through persecution, murder and the mass exodus of the survivors. The Middle East used to have a lot more Christians than it does now and the history of what happened to them isn't pretty.

You obviously are not very educated on the topic and only know what you have heard from faux. Islam is the dominant religion in many places outside the middle east. In those places you do not have the problems you have in the middle east. People in the middle east are poor and dont have places they can escape too. They have governments and groups in power that force people to have to conform or die. That is the problem. Very much like some parts of Africa.

 

[SherdogFan23]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.

Add the 5 killed in the last attack and its up to 31 for the muslim radicals.

The difference is the news down plays any killings by white extremists. It doesnt make the news. It doesnt sell. Plus you would have fox and their brain washed 72 year old audience going crazy that people are trying to blame all right wingers for the attacks.

The reality both the Islamist and Christian terrorists are right wing extremists. The only difference is they believe two different versions of a fairy tale.

Oh and to add to that in a survey of police officers through out the country the group they worry about most is not muslims but right wing extremists.

That is hilarious. You chose the two of the most liberal sources possible but that is okay. I'll play. You mentioned religion in your post but the article is about HOMEGROWN.

The Charleston shooting is not a religious killing. It is a racist killing (not right wing at all). There isn't one picture or sentence relating the killer to religious beliefs. He is a pure bigot piece of crap. Here is his comment. Tell me where he uses any religious links or links to the right at all.

“N*****s are stupid and violent. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country,” he wrote. “We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.”

Boston Marathon bombing - Muslim Homegrown but not Right wing or Christian.

Fort Hood Shooting - Nidal Malik Hasan (Muslim) - Homegrown, but not right wing or Christian.

Maybe you need to try again.

 

[CreatureCore]

Today I learned that white=right wing=Christian.

Cool beans.

So when you have white people killing blacks, jews, and police officials because they dont recognize their authority think these people vote democrat?

 

[CreatureCore]

That is hilarious. You chose the two of the most liberal sources possible but that is okay. I'll play. You mentioned religion in your post but the article is about HOMEGROWN.

The Charleston shooting is not a religious killing. It is a racist killing (not right wing at all). There isn't one picture or sentence relating the killer to religious beliefs. He is a pure bigot piece of crap. Here is his comment. Tell me where he uses any religious links or links to the right at all.



Boston Marathon bombing - Muslim Homegrown but not Right wing or Christian.

Fort Hood Shooting - Nidal Malik Hasan (Muslim) - Homegrown, but not right wing or Christian.

Maybe you need to try again.

Where did i say it was only religious killings? I said right wing extremist groups/christian extremists. I know the right likes to deny it, but the racist groups in this country fall on one side of the political spectrum.

And i love the liberal source stuff republicans like to throw out. They are called facts. Follow the links and look at data. But its such a common cliche its almost sad how true it is. Facts do have a liberal bias.

 

[Queen B]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.

Add the 5 killed in the last attack and its up to 31 for the muslim radicals.

The difference is the news down plays any killings by white extremists. It doesnt make the news. It doesnt sell. Plus you would have fox and their brain washed 72 year old audience going crazy that people are trying to blame all right wingers for the attacks.

The reality both the Islamist and Christian terrorists are right wing extremists. The only difference is they believe two different versions of a fairy tale.

Oh and to add to that in a survey of police officers through out the country the group they worry about most is not muslims but right wing extremists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html
"74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism."

because the population of whites vs middle eastern islamists in America is 50:50


not to mention the fact that liberals kill more than conservatives

 

[Redhawks100]

You see, Cerrone well... he's a moron.

 

[Wayweary]

You obviously are not very educated on the topic and only know what you have heard from faux. Islam is the dominant religion in many places outside the middle east. In those places you do not have the problems you have in the middle east. People in the middle east are poor and dont have places they can escape too. They have governments and groups in power that force people to have to conform or die. That is the problem. Very much like some parts of Africa.

How many books have you read on the topic? You don't seem to know what you are talking about so I'm guessing none. How about doing some studying of the relevant history. I don't even watch Fox and I never have unless it's to make fun of it.

"People in the Middle East are poor and don't have places they can escape to."

Everyone except the completely infirm or indigent can make an attempt to flee and that's why there are huge populations of refugees in more than one county in and out of the Middle East, consisting of people from Middle Eastern countries. Many times, refugees have nothing but what is on their backs. So, what you just said is ridiculously misinformed. I've personally spoken to plenty of Christians other minority religions like Baha'i that were forced to flee from Iraq and other countries in the Middle East due to religious persecution from Muslims, losing many of their family to genocidal-type attacks going back decades before 9/11. Do you really think that they spare non-Muslims when in Iraq the sectarian violence against just different sects of Islam has been rampant? I don't expect you to have real life experience, but you could attempt to educate yourself on the matter.

 

[manwich]

I fast forwarded to 59 min mark and didn't hear any terrorist comments from Cowboy.

Murica

 

[SherdogFan23]

Considering there have been more killings since 9/11 by right wing/christian extremist groups in this country then muslim killings i don't think thats the case.

Where did i say it was only religious killings? I said right wing extremist groups/christian extremists. I know the right likes to deny it, but the racist groups in this country fall on one side of the political spectrum.

And i love the liberal source stuff republicans like to throw out. They are called facts. Follow the links and look at data. But its such a common cliche its almost sad how true it is. Facts do have a liberal bias.

^Both of your posts above

Muslims are not right wing. About 85% of muslims voted for Obama. They are mostly left wing.

Once again, name all of the Right wing or Christian killers that exceeds the quantity by the Left Wing and Muslim Extremists.

 

[Wayweary]

Where did i say it was only religious killings? I said right wing extremist groups/christian extremists. I know the right likes to deny it, but the racist groups in this country fall on one side of the political spectrum.

And i love the liberal source stuff republicans like to throw out. They are called facts. Follow the links and look at data. But its such a common cliche its almost sad how true it is. Facts do have a liberal bias.

That's patently absurd. Liberalism is a philosophy. It can be both supported and criticized through the use of either good or bad information. There are just as many liberal canards as there are conservative ones.