- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 11,284
- Reaction score
- 0
Jeff Mayweather and Kevin Lee debate
Top wrestlers and grapplers easlly destroys pure boxers if they don't fight dumb.Top boxers could easily destroy mma fighters with little or no experience.
About as well as a top kickboxer with minimal training... so it depends on the individual I guess.
Think Tyson would do way better than Mayweather for example. Boxing 'point fighting' wouldn't work well, being a heavy hitter in the bigger divisions could.
Yeah, until they face a guy with strong leg kicks.one year of training pure grappling would make them pretty decent
they wouldn't need to spend any time training striking because they'll already be better than anybody in MMA
I agree about Tyson vs Mayweathers style in MMA, but I actually think a kickboxer has a slight advantage transitioning over compared to a boxer because they have a more dynamic range of strikes, which helps, and are able to fight at a greater distance which is advantageous against grapplers trying to take you down or get you against the cage.
Depends on your definition of "minimal" but no they would get taken down and submitted
Yea it would be hard to imagine Conor winning against boxers. Actually given Conor's success, I am more optimistic about boxers with KO power's ability to make that transition.Also depends on your definition of "successful". GGG or Floyd could easily destroy Conor with minimal training. Not so much against well-rounded fighters.
So they would easily destroy a BJJ brown belt with minimal training? Please do elaborate, bungler.Also depends on your definition of "successful". GGG or Floyd could easily destroy Conor with minimal training. Not so much against well-rounded fighters.