- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 711
- Reaction score
- 115
Yes and they would both also be undersized against Joannalots of 115 should be at 105 tecia torres and esparza are 5'1".
Yes and they would both also be undersized against Joannalots of 115 should be at 105 tecia torres and esparza are 5'1".
obligatory pictures
![]()
![]()
On topic good fight,but Michelle needs a copuple of fights before,otherwise JJ will beat the shit out of her
Karate Hottie should just do Penthouse before she gets too old. To answer your question. She would be 3-1 dog. Waterson has trouble with mediocre fighters, much less killers like JJ.
She won the first two rounds, no questions asked, with that gameplan. She ran out of gas and turned into a punching bag, but she was landing almost equally with Joanna in the first and second as well as scoring takedowns. I hate to go into hypotheticals, but another round like the first and second and she could have likely got the decision. It's not unfair to call that a good blueprint if somebody has the cardio and technical proficiency to pull it off, which I admitted nobody does.By laying the blueprint do you mean throw less total punches than Joanna landed, take her down at a clip of 30% while being unable to keep her on the ground and have your cardio dry up during the 2nd round?
There is no way to create a blueprint, Joanna comes back better in every fight and adapts to adversity during the fight.
So much disgusting and creepy. I don't care about all the 'human nature' excuses. Can ANY OF YOU talk about these women simply as fighters without adding all your extra lascivious bullshit?
that cut probably dried out all the eggs in her ovaries.First of all Letourneau is NOT a SW, she's a bantamweight that shrunk down to SW, so bad she put Conor to shame and won
Miss Auschwitz 2015 at 193
![]()
Christ i'm sure the Aussies wanted to throw some kangaroo burgers at her when they saw her at the weigh ins.
Joanna was struggling against Valerie Letourneau. Joanna's a great fighter but she's not as dominate as people make her out to be. She dominates fighters who lack striking skills, but she struggles against fighters who are good strikers.
joanna wasn't struggling at all, she broke her hand In the 2nd and still won a 49-46 decision pretty handily.Joanna was struggling against Valerie Letourneau. Joanna's a great fighter but she's not as dominate as people make her out to be. She dominates fighters who lack striking skills, but she struggles against fighters who are good strikers.
She won the first two rounds, no questions asked, with that gameplan. She ran out of gas and turned into a punching bag, but she was landing almost equally with Joanna in the first and second as well as scoring takedowns. I hate to go into hypotheticals, but another round like the first and second and she could have likely got the decision. It's not unfair to call that a good blueprint if somebody has the cardio and technical proficiency to pull it off, which I admitted nobody does.
Michelle a better striker then Letrouneau!??!!??
What the fuck are you smoking?
As much as I dislike him, Faber is at least a top ten fighter who crushes lesser fighters.Karate hottie is basicly the Uriah faber of her division