- Joined
- May 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,847
- Reaction score
- 1
That's not how life works, and you have no clue how fighting or arguments work. You didn't exactly end your day a member of Mensa, honey, quite the opposite.Because your argument hinges on "size and strength don't matter".
If you admit that Draymond would beat Ronda, you admit that size and strength do in fact matter.
If you admit that, you admit that it is not a forgone conclusion that Mighty Mouse kicks Draymonds ass because mighty mouse trains.
Skill is very important, but so is size and strength. There is weight differential at which size and strength begin to over come skill.
If you truly believe that "any trained person beats any untrained person regardless of size and strength", then you simply can't be very bright.
You literally posted that the only thing wrong with a man fighting a woman is that it's a mismatch because all that's different between us is size and strength. You also think saying size and strength matter means that nonfighter ballsport athletes are gods of war because you're a 12 year old hobo on a library computer or some mole person. Again, you lack anything resembling a grasp on reality.
You think my argument "hinges" on size and strength not mattering? My argument is that only another serious professional fighter can best another serious professional fighter in a one on one fight which is some no shit Sherlock shit like as certain as saying 1 + 1 is 2 but you're some crazy ass mentally ill kid screaming that it's 3 over and over again. That's just how wrong you are to think that a nonfighter has an answer for anything the professional fighter throws their way.
A professional fighter knows how to throw all the basic strikes properly, which is fast, precise and refined to say the very least about them. The nonfighter does not, the nonfighter cannot due to never having trained at all. Compared to any fighter, they are: lost, slow, not coordinated with fighting, crossing their feet walking or running if not awkwardly and exaggerating hops or even worse, jumps; they will charge with their heads ahead of their strikes, if they attempt a combo you'll see them take an entire second to throw one strike at best when even heavyweights in MMA have been seen able to throw 4, they'd be unable to defend takedown attempts due to never having trained TDD or grappling of any kind and can be subbed instantly once it hits the ground and have no scramble nor positioning ability to speak of. They have no tactics or strategies available nor would they ever be able to adapt on the fly enough without any training.
Similar descriptions with literally every single move and combo one could think up throughout all the time it would take to list every single move and combination of moves one could make during a fight. You're the LARPer who thinks otherwise and consider any and all realists to be stupid. This is utterly ridiculous.
You think it takes more than keeping them at they end of their jab, chipping away with double and triple jabs while mixing rear straights/cross counters as well as check and everyday leadhooks with the occasional rear hook, lead uppercut and counter right hook and uppercut? They'd literally be helpless even if the pro fighter decided to play matador and exclusively utilize check hooks.
Stop posting in any thread related to MMA.
Last edited: