@Conor_Is_Overrated
Both of yous (or to anyone else repeating that talking point) Is yous people trolling or just "challenged"
Mini-Mouse was subbed silly by Brad Picket who has more losses then Nate
Jones got beat my a crippled MW reject who has more losses then Nate
Gsp tapped to strikes against a blown up LW who has more losses then Nate
Anderson got wrecked by a Japanese can who has more losses then Nate.
I guess they are all disqualified then too. By your criteria no one can ever be the GOAT
Sugar Ray Robinson, widely considered the goat of boxing, has damn near 20 losses you bozo
you have no idea about anything you're talking about
But I'm not surprised, Conor haters are casual WWE marks who are new to MMA, and have only been watching since UFC 229. They have no idea who Takese was, that Anderson got embaressed by him, or who Chonan even was, another fighter who embaressed Anderson while Anderson was in his physical prime
Losses and title defenses have never determined GOAT. Again, Conor haters are just casuals who are new to fighting. They don't know any better. Its about belts, divisional titles, and who beat the best. People are too blinded by hate to ever admit that Conor actually has a hell of a resume. He was the first ever double champ. To this day, he's the only undisputed lineal double champ in MALE MMA history. Conor is absolutely a GOAT. He is competing in the best divisions in MMA history, which count for a whole lot more then wins at LHW lmao. Jones's wins in the weakest division in MMA history against MWs and senior citizens mean nothing. Jones isnt even top 5.
Wins over Aldo, Holloway, Poirier, Alvarez, Cerrone, Nate (FW and LW=deepest divisions in MMA history) equals yep, thats a GOAT resume for damn sure