- Joined
- May 8, 2005
- Messages
- 19,352
- Reaction score
- 7,781
and that difference is relevant to the discussion how?A 50 year old, not 70
and that difference is relevant to the discussion how?A 50 year old, not 70
Or maybe….. heres a wild thought. This DJ is pissed at Conor, you know because he punched him in face lol. And it being all over the news and making him look like a fool.
So he wants to hurt Conor the worst way possible. His pocket. Its really not that complicated bro. People sue out of spite too. These things are not always about money. Like guy said before this DJ already has money and a big inheritance I bet.
I don’t like false narratives that’s alland that difference is relevant to the discussion how?
the narrative remains exactly the same.I don’t like false narratives that’s all
It does though. A 50 year old isn’t a senior citizen, while hitting a 90 year old would be a murder attemptthe narrative remains exactly the same.
conor is so unhinged he punches elderly people unprovoked. if the guy is 50 or 90 makes absolutely no difference to "the narrative".
There are differences between religious and secular sinsI think it says alot about our society that a guy like Miguel Torres can be fired for quoting a rape joke on Twitter but guys like Conor and Jones can be actual violent felons and not only still have jobs but still be promoted
There are differences between religious and secular sins
Yeah and I’m not excusing Conor, but this guy playing innocent like he can’t fathom why Conor did it is pretty weak
50 years old is still old and no 50 year old should be blind sided by a professional fighter. I don't like your narrative, trying to make it sound less serious. Fuck offIt does though. A 50 year old isn’t a senior citizen, while hitting a 90 year old would be a murder attempt
He should have trained at Springfield Top Team; Marge knows how to handle that situation:Well, the old man that Conor once hit was refusing to drink his whisley brand