Crime Congressman put mistress and fiancée’s daughter on payroll

44nutman

44nutman

The Original Nut of Sherdog
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
24,976
Reaction score
31,335

Republican put mistress on congressional payroll with $2K a month gig: report

A first-term Long Island Republican congressman gave a job in his office to a woman he was having an affair with, reported The New York Times — possibly in violation of House ethics rules."Shortly after taking the oath of office, the first-term congressman hired his longtime fiancée’s daughter...
www.rawstory.com

In case the title mislead you, that is 2 people not that the mistress is also his fiancée’s daughter, because the Congressman does have standards.
The problem with this is you used to resign after committing ethic crimes as an elected official but now your teams media will never bring it up so you can just power through and voters on your team are so brand loyal they will keep voting for you anyway.
That is one big problem with partisan media today, they used to hold shit heads on their team accountable but it seems selling boner pill ads is the only thing that matters, so better off not to pull back the curtain for the Rubes.
 
Last edited:
44nutman said:

Republican put mistress on congressional payroll with $2K a month gig: report

A first-term Long Island Republican congressman gave a job in his office to a woman he was having an affair with, reported The New York Times — possibly in violation of House ethics rules."Shortly after taking the oath of office, the first-term congressman hired his longtime fiancée’s daughter...
www.rawstory.com

In case the title mislead you, that is 2 people not that the mistress is also his fiancée’s daughter, because the Congressman does have standards.
The problem with this is you used to resign after committing ethic crimes as an elected official but now your teams media will never bring it up so you can just power through and voters on your team are so brand loyal they will keep voting for you anyway.
That is one big problem with partisan media today, they used to hold shit heads on their team accountable but it seems selling boner pill ads is the only thing that matters, so better off not to pull back the curtain for the Rubes.
Click to expand...
"Your team's" media meaning Fox News I assume? Even if that was true, what about the other 90% of main stream media that would eagerly jump all over this?
 
Confucamus said:
"Your team's" media meaning Fox News I assume? Even if that was true, what about the other 90% of main stream media that would eagerly jump all over this?
Click to expand...
Even if it was true statement, is you coping.
The media asked for his statement, and of course he says he is committed to securing the borders, nothing about the mistress and Fiancée's daughter on the payroll, which is him trying to distract his base from seeing he is a corrupt shit head.
I am pretty sure there are people out there who could run for office, who also are committed to securing the borders, without breaking ethics laws while a member of Congress.
Character used to matter, but not anymore, just the letter after your name, no matter what you do, can get you at least 30% of the vote.
 
44nutman said:
Even if it was true statement, is you coping.
Click to expand...
lol Not really. I couldn't care less about this guy. If he violated any policy, fire his ass.

44nutman said:
The media asked for his statement, and of course he says he is committed to securing the borders, nothing about the mistress and Fiancée's daughter on the payroll, which is him trying to distract his base from seeing he is a corrupt shit head.
I am pretty sure there are people out there who could run for office, who also are committed to securing the borders, without breaking ethics laws while a member of Congress.
Character used to matter, but not anymore, just the letter after your name, no matter what you do, can get you at least 30% of the vote.
Click to expand...
You initially said his team's media wouldn't bring it up. Now you're saying the media had nothing to say because he wouldn't answer them on it?
 
44nutman said:
Is it too much to ask that elected officials not commit ethic violations?
The mistress thing is not a violation. It is morally wrong but having both of those chicks on his payroll violates the law. Some of us prefer Law and Order.
Click to expand...
<YeahOKJen>
 
Confucamus said:
lol Not really. I couldn't care less about this guy. If he violated any policy, fire his ass.


You initially said his team's media wouldn't bring it up. Now you're saying the media had nothing to say because he wouldn't answer them on it?
Click to expand...
I guess because he has an R after his name you can’t bring yourself to say “Hey it is wrong for this dude to have his mistress and his Fiancée’s daughter on his payroll because that is illegal”
. Look at you being cool with your tax dollars being used to pay side pieces.
Your media has trained you well.
A simple it was the wrong thing to do would suffice and save you multiple deflection posts.

Look Forward to more panic wrestling and whataboutisms.
 
44nutman said:
I guess because he has an R after his name you can’t bring yourself to say “Hey it is wrong for this dude to have his mistress and his Fiancée’s daughter on his payroll because that is illegal”
. Look at you being cool with your tax dollars being used to pay side pieces.
Your media has trained you well.
A simple it was the wrong thing to do would suffice and save you multiple deflection posts.

Look Forward to more panic wrestling and whataboutisms.
Click to expand...
If you'd stop pretending its just the people on the opposite side of the political spectrum, we could get somewhere. I don't think you really care though.
 
44nutman said:
I guess because he has an R after his name you can’t bring yourself to say “Hey it is wrong for this dude to have his mistress and his Fiancée’s daughter on his payroll because that is illegal”
Click to expand...
Having an R after his name is the only reason you made this thread. If he broke the law, let him suffer the consequences.

44nutman said:
. Look at you being cool with your tax dollars being used to pay side pieces.
Your media has trained you well.
A simple it was the wrong thing to do would suffice and save you multiple deflection posts.

Look Forward to more panic wrestling and whataboutisms.
Click to expand...
You didn't address my post at all.
 
44nutman said:
I guess because he has an R after his name you can’t bring yourself to say “Hey it is wrong for this dude to have his mistress and his Fiancée’s daughter on his payroll because that is illegal”
. Look at you being cool with your tax dollars being used to pay side pieces.
Your media has trained you well.
A simple it was the wrong thing to do would suffice and save you multiple deflection posts.

Look Forward to more panic wrestling and whataboutisms.
Click to expand...
And yet you're still voting for a presidential candidate who was herself the side piece taking a taxpayer funded salary for sucking off the mayor.

You also didn't seem to mind Fani Willis funneling $700k of taxpayer money in just over a year to her married fuck buddy and stuffing wads of cash from her campaign funds in her mattress, and were offended by anyone suggesting it wasn't brave, beautiful and empowering for her to bang male prostitutes, so your thread is probably not going to get a ton of traffic when you suddenly pretend to be outraged over a $30k secretary job because you finally found some guy nobody's heard of with an R next to his name.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,262,008
Messages
57,135,154
Members
175,552
Latest member
kyejay87

Share this page

Back
Top