Condit vs Lawler. Greatest robbery of all time?

[Jonesisinnocent]

Rewatching this and the only round I could give to Lawler is round 5. The judges should have had horrific things happen to them for this decision

 

[ChessJitsu]

Didn't a lot of people complain about Condit vs. Nick Diaz.

Also Lawler's championship reign was awesome for fans so maybe it wasn't so bad

 

[Kowboy On Sherdog]

Probably Jones vs Reyes ... Clear as day 48-47 Reyes

 

[Question]

I don't know if it's the craziest robbery, but I did also score it for Condit when I watched it last
That was a long time ago however so I'm not sure

In terms of championship fights it can be a notable one if you think Condit should of got the nod that night, great fight though

 

[Luthien]

Nick Diaz 1 3 5

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

1) The Ruthless Era is unmatched
2) This decision is karma for the Nick Diaz "fight"

 

[GoWokeGoBroke]

I’ll never disparage the ruthless one

 

[Left Hook Lacy]

That was heartbreaking and legacy-altering. Condit should have been champ.

 

[CrimsonFan]

That was heartbreaking and legacy-altering. Condit should have been champ.

Yea he should have won after getting his ass kicked across the octagon the entire 5th round

Give me a break. Condits weak ass point fighting bullshit wasnt fooling the judges that night

 

[Why did you]

Probably Jones vs Reyes ... Clear as day 48-47 Reyes

 

[Xoleth]

Nope, it was Reyes by far, much easier to score

Condit had a lot of volume, but Lawler hit him harder
I would say Condit won, but it was closer than Reyes vs Jones, where Reyes had more volume and also hit harder

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Didn't a lot of people complain about Condit vs. Nick Diaz.

A lot of morons, yeah.
@Luthien
@Only Here for Attachments

Also Lawler's championship reign was awesome for fans so maybe it wasn't so bad

The fight itself was incredible too. Really dampened some of the outrage.

Probably Jones vs Reyes ... Clear as day 48-47 Reyes

I lean more towards this because of how incredibly obvious it was by round count. Condit vs Lawler, I more feel like should have been obvious as a whole, considering Condit outlanded Lawler at nearly a 2:1 ratio and a landed almost as many strikes as Lawler attempted, so you'd have to think that Lawler is hitting twice as hard as Condit on average for that to become even, but I could also see people thinking that's true.

Jones-Reyes was just simply "Can you count to 3 in a row?" and look at all the people who failed.

There are more unexplainable robberies than the above, mind you, these are just among the "biggest" because of having a title attached to them.

That was heartbreaking and legacy-altering. Condit should have been champ.

I think it basically killed all future fights for him too. He had nothing to give after that

 

[chinarice]

Rewatching this and the only round I could give to Lawler is round 5. The judges should have had horrific things happen to them for this decision

It has to be in the top3. There is no argument Lawler won 3 rounds. Hard pressed to give him 2.

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

A lot of morons, yeah.
@Luthien
@Only Here for Attachments

Meh, I just like seeing the super-emotional, haughty, Condit huggers cut down to size. Certain fighters just seem to attract the most bleeding heart, "Born to feel" types out there.

 

[markg171]

Lotta dumb fucks on here think the greatest robberies of all time involve shit like 48-47s that are decided by 1 round they maybe possibly disagree on. Those are called close fights.

Robberies are reserved for clean sweep decisions and/or 4-1 where someone really clearly lost but somehow won the decision.

 

[Substance Abuse]

Didn't a lot of people complain about Condit vs. Nick Diaz.

Yes, and those people are idiots.

 

[JBJ was here]

Anyone who calls landing one toe tip with no power to the skull plate a "flush head kick" has no business scoring a fight. That kick hurt Reyes's toe vastly more than it damaged Jones.

 

[Substance Abuse]

Bisping/Hamill; Garcia/Pham; Garcia/KZ; and Pearson/Sanchez are worse than Condit/Lawler, though I do agree, Condit won that fight pretty clearly.

 

[Chet Ubetcha]

GSP/Hendricks, by far worse than Lawler/Condit. There wasn't a person in that Octagon when the decision was being read who thought it was going GSP's way. Not GSP, not Johny, not Yamasaki, not Dana White. Nobody. Hell, Dana was even getting ready to put the belt on Johny Henrdicks, and you can see the surprise on his face when he is caught off-guard.

 

[JakePaulMMA]

Didn't a lot of people complain about Condit vs. Nick Diaz.

Also Lawler's championship reign was awesome for fans so maybe it wasn't so bad

Diaz 1,2,5!