Condit/Lawler Silva/Bisping

[BigggerNog]

each fight had a point fighter against a more devastating striker....but they had the opposite outcome....there needs to be more consistency in this sport. If Bispong won, than condit deserves to be the champ.

 

[IamStryker]

Judging definitely needs more consistency.

And a new system while we are at it.

 

[RiotWyatt]

When did Condit drop Lawler?

 

[RiotWyatt]

Lawler didn't sit against the fence for 3 minutes, letting Condit tee off on him.

Bisping wasn't point fighting. He was going for the finish but just doesn't have the power.

Condit, on the other hand, has the power but point fought.

 

[Bend NvR Break]

Robbie kept coming forward and didn't back up against the fence for half the fight.

 

[Greedy Dana]

Robbie kept coming forward and didn't back up against the fence for half the fight.

Still didn't do as much damage.

 

[aerius]

When did Condit drop Lawler?

3:30 to go in round 1.

 

[Neitzsche]

What a silly comparison.

Bisping owned the fight in it's entire context. Anderson backslid in his foolishness.

Anderson landed two very significant shots. Bisping controlled most of the fight landing volume and even dropping Anderson.

Anderson is clearly the better fighter but he's his own worst enemy. Bisping won this fight.

 

[613]

each fight had a point fighter against a more devastating striker....but they had the opposite outcome....there needs to be more consistency in this sport. If Bispong won, than condit deserves to be the champ.

So who was the point fighter in Robbie vs Lawler? Not the guy with best finishing % at WW?

 

[Blayt7hh]

You're retarded TS. You know Condit has a way higher finish rate that Lawler... oh fuck it..

http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Carlos-Condit-6765
93% finish rate in his 30 wins and you're calling him a point fighter. That's a special kind of stupid