Rewatch Condit’s body language being announced winner vs Diaz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 359865
  • Start date Start date
I did the same thing, I said this fight LITERALLY can NOT be boring.
Yep. If Diaz had won, it would've been interesting if he stuck around at WW longer (instead of a pointless Andreson Silva fight at MW followed by a super long layoff). I think he would've matched up well vs. Lawler. I know the shell of the corpse of Nick lost to Robbie a few years ago, but while in his prime, Nick had both an iron chin and endless cardio and punching. Lawler could be inactive at times and would've had a very hard time finishing Nick IMO.
 
Pfff he tricked y'as all
I was enraged
images
 
Someone make a poll, lets settle this shit once and for all!
 
Last edited:
Bullshit.

I been hearing about this weed laced with other drugs ever since D.A.R.E. and I have smoked all sorts of weed and weed products and its always just weed.

I think one time I got something that had a little something extra curricular going on but even then I think it was known to have been purchased as weed laced with some sort of coke or stimulant.

I was told of this random free additional drugs myth and heard all about it.

It's bullshit.

Bullshit I say.
Well you can't just be normal weed high and think Diaz won because I would have thought Diaz won then.....
 
There is literally ZERO argument Lawler won more than 2 rounds and it's a BIG STRETCH to give him 2.

It's super easy to give Condit rounds 1-4. It's the biggest robbery in UFC title fight history and I will die on that hill
How do you give 2nd round to Condit?
 
How do you give 2nd round to Condit?
The round where Condit threw nearly 4x the strikes as Lawler and landed twice as much? Really? You don't think it's debatable Condit won that round? There was an argument Lawler won round 5 for sure and I thought he did. A bit of an argument for 2 but not a lock he won 2 either. There's zero argument he won round 1, 3 or 4. HE got outstruck 47 to 6 in round 4. This is another fight that shows how flawed MMA scoring is.

It's literally the worst decision in UFC title fight history.
 
The round where Condit threw nearly 4x the strikes as Lawler and landed twice as much? Really? You don't think it's debatable Condit won that round? There was an argument Lawler won round 5 for sure and I thought he did. A bit of an argument for 2 but not a lock he won 2 either. There's zero argument he won round 1, 3 or 4. HE got outstruck 47 to 6 in round 4. This is another fight that shows how flawed MMA scoring is.

It's literally the worst decision in UFC title fight history.
Imo he won rd 2 and 5,he landed the biggest shots in both while being outstruck in both.Had a KD in that 2nd round too
As far as decision goes or rd 4 didnt say anything about it.Was just curious why is rd2 given to Condit
 

Condit after losing to GSP and regretting doing what they told him :p
 
Back
Top