- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
- Messages
- 8,726
- Reaction score
- 2,985
Business wise it's the exact same.wwf was *is* fake... no comparison
Business wise it's the exact same.wwf was *is* fake... no comparison
Ted Turner gave WCW an open checkbook to steal top names away from WWF.
Last I checked Conor, Ronda, Brock, GSP, etc are not in Bellator.
Also Viacom is not interested in going after UFC like Turner was interested in going after Vince.
Trust me they are. They did the same with TNA when they had them. One week paid millions for hulk and bischoff, and next week switched over to Monday nights to compete.... Only to go back to whatever day barely 2 months later
Business wise it's the exact same.
WCW was my stuff man. Sting in the crow costume was awesome. I remember when he had to choose between the white and red NWO. Man...good times.
What are we talking about again?
Trust me they are. They did the same with TNA when they had them. One week paid millions for hulk and bischoff, and next week switched over to Monday nights to compete.... Only to go back to whatever day barely 2 months later
I wonder if people who compare UFC to WWE ever actually watched WWE
Low quality UFC skype conference call is 10x times more exciting than WWE's main event of the year.
Tachi Palace Fights = ECW
I don't even get how people reach so far to make comparisons to fake wrestling. It is completely different "entertainment".
You know WCW was raping WWF in the ratings and such for years, right? WWF used to be 2nd place for a good while, and WCW was the top dog. I don't think a lot of people actually know that.
UFC is like attitude era WWF/WWE and Bellator is WCW while on its way down. That's how much better UFC is than Bellator. I like both but Bellator ain't shit compared to the UFC right now.
Maybe if the new UFC owners keep being stupid then Bellator will rise, but it's going to take a long time for that to happen IMO. UFC is still #1 and will stay that way for years to come. Bellator is definitely getting better (not better than UFC) since they're finally getting some great, true top level fighters, but they're going to need a he'll of a lot more if they truly want to compete with the UFC.
I love both, especially the Pride style events that Bellator has sometimes, but the talent in the UFC makes it that much better and that's all there is to it.
Plus UFC just had their 2 best years.
WWF had about 5 years straight that were worse than the last.
And it's all thanks to Conor, lol. They basically just had their best 2 years EVER and hopefully this year will be just as good. Conor gets a lot of hate, but we can't deny he brings a lot of excitement still. All the talking and money aside, from a fan POV, Conor is awesome to watch as a fighter.
I don't care what anybody says - we're all going to miss him when he's gone, the haters too. The haters might miss him more than some of his fans for fuck's sake because they won't have anybody to cry about anymore.
None of that is wrong & none of that has to do with my point that there is no comparison lol
Actually a lot of it was RR too (TBF)
It was mostly directed towards the first thing you, but I did end up getting carried away as usual, lol.
I guess you're right about Ronda. I completely forgot about her since she hasn't been active. Another OT post (about something we've all talked about already): the way the UFC only talked about Ronda leading up to the Nunes fight was disgusting.
Then you know something every MMA & TV analyst doesn't.
Coker himself said otherwise & that he is limited on who they could go after.
Also Viacom did not own TNA, that was Dixie Carter that put TNA in debt by thinking they could compete.
Its far far closer to compare WWE, WWF whatever to soap operas like days of our lives and late soap Dallas than it is to compare the UFC and Bellator to the fake wrestling stuff.
Anytime you script a year in advance and pay actors to play out scenes...it has nothing to do with a real sport.