If you think Belal and Colby are identical threats to Leon, wash your glasses haha. Colby has a much higher pace than Belal, and thus a better chance of overwhelming Leon over 5 rounds and negating his kicking game.
Not saying it's a given, but they're not the same. Same style, but different output and efficiency
If you think what I said equals "they're identical threats" then wash
your glasses. I said if OP thinks Colby will beat Leon -- which he seems incredibly confident of -- then he must also acknowledge that Belal at least stands a notable chance rather than entirely dismissing him out of hand which he did in the very same post, as if him fighting Leon is a foregone conclusion in which he is a lamb being sent to the slaughter. Belal has Colby's five-round cardio, a pretty potent offensive & defensive wrestling game, and actually lands slightly more strikes per minute. I agree that Colby's wrestling pace is more aggressive and dangerous along with a more varied striking game, though Belal has shown the ability to be able to set a respectable pace in both of those departments as well.
Context matters.
c
I agree with you but look at where we are at. burns begged for the masvidal fight. Usman begged for the masvidal fight. Edwards is begging for the masvidal fight.
Irrelevant.
We can question the relevence of beating masvidal in 2023, but it's the hot new thing when you give a guy like that 2 title fights in a row his name value gets inflated. Even champions want to fight him.
Irrelevant.
Some say that burns vs masvidal winner should get the title shot but should they? Should masvidal who would be 1-3 in his last 4 get a shot win a win over burns? Should burns get a shot for beating masvidal? if burns gets the shot for being masvidal, Why not colby? he beat him more recently.
No, Belal should get the title shot. If Burns beats Masvidal, he would have a better case for a title shot than Colby, yes. If Masvidal upsets Burns, then no -- Colby would have a better case. Burns wouldn't get a title shot "for beating Masvidal". He would get it for being an active contender in the division who was on a 2-fight win streak and had just defeated two ranked contenders. This isn't rocket science.
And as far as "meritocractic matchmaking" goes, Fans are fickle and don't care. People on this very website were cool with glover vs jiri 2 only because they like glover. No other reason was it merited but by my measure a majority of people were okay with it. now they are not okay with this and it's not because of merit, it's because of bias.
I like Glover. He was one of my favorite fighters. I argued extensively against the immediate rematch because it made no sense based on the meritocratic standings of the division. But all I got was a bunch of people bitching about "Buuuut Glover deseeeeeeeeerves it! He's oooooold!"
Kindly don't apply your blanket justifications to an entire fanbase.
Just to make things clear, If you're not okay with Colby getting a shot at leon with a win over masvidal we should also protest....
- Stipe vs jones
- Glover vs jiri 2
- Masvidal vs Usman 1 (it was booked and fell through before it was made a replacement)
- Masvidal vs usman 2
- Leon vs Usman 1 (nate diaz, earning leon a title shot in 2022)
- many many more to come
Colby vs leon is much less offensive. atleast colby is a top 5 guy coming off a win.
- I am a massive Stipe fan -- dude literally got me into the sport -- and I have said on multiple occasions that he doesn't belong anywhere near the title without beating a Top 5 guy.
- See above.
- What are you on about? Masvidal was on a three-fight winning streak against Darren Till (#3 in the division and recent title challenger), Ben Askren (#5 and then-undefeated), and Nate Diaz (#7) -- all in the space of a year and all by finish. Him filling in on short notice for a title fight is in no way egregious, dude.
- Yes, Masvidal/Usman 2 was stupid, needless legacy-building for Usman. No one disputes this.
- I don't agree with Nate Diaz being fed to a Top 5 contender, but Leon had arguably already earned a title shot. It didn't help that his fights fell against other previous top contenders (Chimaev, Woodley back when he was relevant, etc.) kept falling through, often through no fault of his own. So yes, protest-worthy, but only mildly so.
Colby vs. Leon is plenty egregious on its own. I should also note that the whole "Why are you outraged about this?! Just look at all of these other bad things!" smokescreen is a pretty low form of debating just on basic principle.