Oh you're so cool! You didn't make a mistake when typing your and you're.
I am not pinning my hopes on solely on Rudy Giuliani, he's a figurehead for the investigation. Right now I am watching the hearings in Michigan as I did for Pennsylvania, and witness after witness, with sworn affidavits, punishable with jail time are presenting their testimony. They are Republicans and Democrats and members of both parties who were shocked by the fraud they are alleging.
Affidavits are admissable, right? Statistical evidence is admissable, by an expert. When you have affidavits from people saying "hold on a second, we were sent away because they said a pipe burst," but it turns out it didn't, then shortly after, vote dumps occured that don't make sense, then you have an expert analyst say, "there are these vote dumps that actually have never occured anywhere in a normal election", that in tandem; is serious evidence.
So, it's affidavits, circumstantial evidence, corroborated, with statistical anomalies as well as potentially video graphic evidence, and all I have read from people on sherdog is put downs, laughing and a complete dismissal of anything said about the process of what is happening right now. So bite me, you high horse riding, tool of the establishment. By the way, I saw a Rassmussen poll today, that stated 47% of the people in this country think the election was rigged, and 75% of Republicans do. I am not alone in questioning the results.