Crime Clarence Thomas participated in Koch Network events

nhbbear said:
CT was one of my favorite justices because of his steadfastness to the constitution, but with everything that has come out, I won’t say that now. But it is Washington, and every single one of those fucks are bought and paid for by someone. Every fucking last one of them.
Click to expand...
What is the lefts equivalent of Leonard Leo and the federalist society?
 
nhbbear said:
I am fine with that, however, why is CT such a big deal? The reason is because dems will do absolutely anything they can to get more scotus seats. pelosi has been exposed multiple times, as have many, many others-both parties. Like I said, they’re all bought and paid for. But if you go after one, it shouldn’t stop there. But nothing will ever happen with any of the others because they make the rules and have a wink-wink relationship about keeping it profitable for all of them. How else do you explain people entering congress middle class and leaving as multi millionaires?
Click to expand...
I can’t believe my favorite justice (who is a piece of shit) did that.
THEY ARE ALL ON THE TAKE THEN

prove it
 
This same piece of garbage after Roe was overturned said we need to think about same sex marriage and contraception.
See You Next Tuesday.
 
Clarence and Ginny don’t have any children.
I am wondering if any of the dick flopping experts on Sherdog have noticed any flopping in areas where flopping should not occur. “She” towers over Clarence height wise combined with no children, might be worth an investigation.
According to Anita Hill, Clarence was a massive fan of porn star Long Dong Silver who had a massive Dong that when I wiki’ed Long Dong Silver his massive dong was a prosthetic which made me fell sorry for him. If you are going to do porn at least use your real Dong and get a little pleasure out of it. So maybe Ginny is packing since that seems to be Clarence’s kink.
 
In Praise of Clarence Thomas
Justice Thomas has rich friends. So what?

https://www.frontpagemag.com/in-praise-of-clarence-thomas/

Leonard Leo, the founder of the Federalist Society and various other conservative groups, sits on a bundle of money. Moreover, he is giving a lot of it away. He is not giving it to any left-wing cause or even to the Girl Scouts of America. He is giving it to right-wing causes.

About this The Washington Post is apparently furious. Last week, the Post prattled on for a full page starting with page one and continuing on for an entire page — page four — within the newspaper. George Soros devotes such energy to left-wing causes. Dozens of similarly left-wing groups do, too. But only left-wing newspapers expend such energy on left-wing causes and do not admit to having any bias whatsoever. The right-wing Wall Street Journal does not do this for any right-wing cause that I know of, but the Post does it for the left, and other papers on the left do it, too. They never tell their readers what they are up to. A right-wing paper usually does. It is characteristic of American media politics.

Leo is obviously supporting people who favor Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ positions on the court. Thomas is one of the truly great figures to grace the court in our history. Now, I read the entire Washington Post piece, and I could find nothing illegal, wrong-headed, or even in bad taste with what the Post had found Leo and his colleagues guilty of. Leo and his colleagues are conservative, and the Post is left-wing. Lighten up, fellas. There is nothing wrong with that. It is the way politics are supposed to work in a democracy.

Leo gives money to his friends. They break no laws by spending money. There is nothing devious about what they do with the money. Still, the Post is shocked. A gentleman from Texas by the name of Harlan Crow, a billionaire no less, is mentioned in the Post for being particularly generous to Thomas. He apparently paid to bring his friend, Clarence, along on a “luxury vacation.” Where we are not told. But we do not have to know everything. Crow also spent money purchasing Thomas a picture of himself for his alma mater, the Yale Law School. Will Yale hang it? I do not know. And something about a cannery was mentioned, or was it a can? I have forgotten. Crow also has made donations to a wing at a library in Savannah, Georgia, that will bear Thomas’ name. I have not seen the library’s catalog of books to be displayed there, but so far as I know, none is subversive or even pornographic.

Nor is Thomas the only member of the court to be endowed by rich Americans. In 2008, Leo arranged a “fishing trip” for Justice Samuel Alito, and another of those “billionaires” who hover around the Supreme Court gave him a “free ride” in his private jet. But wait a minute. Leo is not the only person picking up the tab for his friends on the court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the subject of a generous documentary on her. And the people who put the documentary together claim it is content that “stands at the intersection of art and activism.” The founder of the documentary claims to have “donated to left-leaning causes.” How stunning.

If this is confusing to you, consider this. The piece goes on for what seems like an eternity. The people at the Post seem to think that they have unearthed a conspiracy of some sort orchestrated by Leonard Leo and perpetrated by Clarence Thomas. Actually, I am familiar with much of what appeared in the Post last week, and I did not think it was so astonishing. It was mostly old news, and if there was anything in the Post piece that was new news, that is because the new news is misinformation.

Consider this. The Post claims, “The extent of Leo’s involvement in the public relations campaign, including the financial backing for websites and articles defending Thomas, has not been previously disclosed.” I have known about Leo’s involvement roughly since it began. So has anyone who looked into it. Leonard, it is money well spent. Carry on, comrade.
 
44nutman said:
Clarence and Ginny don’t have any children.
I am wondering if any of the dick flopping experts on Sherdog have noticed any flopping in areas where flopping should not occur. “She” towers over Clarence height wise combined with no children, might be worth an investigation.
According to Anita Hill, Clarence was a massive fan of porn star Long Dong Silver who had a massive Dong that when I wiki’ed Long Dong Silver his massive dong was a prosthetic which made me fell sorry for him. If you are going to do porn at least use your real Dong and get a little pleasure out of it. So maybe Ginny is packing since that seems to be Clarence’s kink.
Click to expand...

youve finally lost it
 
Beechwood said:
In Praise of Clarence Thomas
Justice Thomas has rich friends. So what?

https://www.frontpagemag.com/in-praise-of-clarence-thomas/

Leonard Leo, the founder of the Federalist Society and various other conservative groups, sits on a bundle of money. Moreover, he is giving a lot of it away. He is not giving it to any left-wing cause or even to the Girl Scouts of America. He is giving it to right-wing causes.

About this The Washington Post is apparently furious. Last week, the Post prattled on for a full page starting with page one and continuing on for an entire page — page four — within the newspaper. George Soros devotes such energy to left-wing causes. Dozens of similarly left-wing groups do, too. But only left-wing newspapers expend such energy on left-wing causes and do not admit to having any bias whatsoever. The right-wing Wall Street Journal does not do this for any right-wing cause that I know of, but the Post does it for the left, and other papers on the left do it, too. They never tell their readers what they are up to. A right-wing paper usually does. It is characteristic of American media politics.

Leo is obviously supporting people who favor Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ positions on the court. Thomas is one of the truly great figures to grace the court in our history. Now, I read the entire Washington Post piece, and I could find nothing illegal, wrong-headed, or even in bad taste with what the Post had found Leo and his colleagues guilty of. Leo and his colleagues are conservative, and the Post is left-wing. Lighten up, fellas. There is nothing wrong with that. It is the way politics are supposed to work in a democracy.

Leo gives money to his friends. They break no laws by spending money. There is nothing devious about what they do with the money. Still, the Post is shocked. A gentleman from Texas by the name of Harlan Crow, a billionaire no less, is mentioned in the Post for being particularly generous to Thomas. He apparently paid to bring his friend, Clarence, along on a “luxury vacation.” Where we are not told. But we do not have to know everything. Crow also spent money purchasing Thomas a picture of himself for his alma mater, the Yale Law School. Will Yale hang it? I do not know. And something about a cannery was mentioned, or was it a can? I have forgotten. Crow also has made donations to a wing at a library in Savannah, Georgia, that will bear Thomas’ name. I have not seen the library’s catalog of books to be displayed there, but so far as I know, none is subversive or even pornographic.

Nor is Thomas the only member of the court to be endowed by rich Americans. In 2008, Leo arranged a “fishing trip” for Justice Samuel Alito, and another of those “billionaires” who hover around the Supreme Court gave him a “free ride” in his private jet. But wait a minute. Leo is not the only person picking up the tab for his friends on the court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the subject of a generous documentary on her. And the people who put the documentary together claim it is content that “stands at the intersection of art and activism.” The founder of the documentary claims to have “donated to left-leaning causes.” How stunning.

If this is confusing to you, consider this. The piece goes on for what seems like an eternity. The people at the Post seem to think that they have unearthed a conspiracy of some sort orchestrated by Leonard Leo and perpetrated by Clarence Thomas. Actually, I am familiar with much of what appeared in the Post last week, and I did not think it was so astonishing. It was mostly old news, and if there was anything in the Post piece that was new news, that is because the new news is misinformation.

Consider this. The Post claims, “The extent of Leo’s involvement in the public relations campaign, including the financial backing for websites and articles defending Thomas, has not been previously disclosed.” I have known about Leo’s involvement roughly since it began. So has anyone who looked into it. Leonard, it is money well spent. Carry on, comrade.
Click to expand...
Funny this “journalist “ never mentions part of Justice Thomas’ problem is he did not disclose his trips as required by law. I wonder why the article left that part out. Justice Thomas excuse is he did not know the law which reflects poorly on someone who sits on the highest court of law in the United States. The utter irony of Thomas pleading ignorance of the law is hilarious.
 
Last edited:
reveler said:
youve finally lost it
Click to expand...
If Michelle Obama is a man then it should be plausible Ginny Thomas could be a man as well.
I am just saying it should be investigated. If she is a woman she should welcome the investigation.
 
44nutman said:
If Michelle Obama is a man then it should be plausible Ginny Thomas could be a man as well.
I am just saying it should be investigated. If she is a woman she should welcome the investigation.
Click to expand...
You're just asking questions, it's the Republican House majority inquiry way...if Ginny does have a dick, everyone, including closeted tranny conservatives, deserves to know.

#freeginnyshog
 
The fact that not one of Sherdogs resident right wing culture warriors has a problem with the obvious and undeniable corruption from a few of the right wing "justices" on the supreme Court shows how devoid of integrity they really are .

They care more about owning the libs than they do about the health of their country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

HOLA
Law Clarence Thomas' money problems
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Corona
Corona

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,898
Messages
55,524,704
Members
174,809
Latest member
BackagainBert

Share this page

Back
Top