So you are defining Muslims that tacking themselves as jihad? I thought jihad was destroying us westerners?
Jihad is also about the war against takfiri, and the majority of targets for jihadists are other Muslims who are not deemed to be practising the religion in a fundamental sense. Jihad is about destroying westerners too, yes, but due to the lack of Western targets
in the Middle East, jihad is committed against other Muslims instead. But as we have seen in the West, once there is an abundance of Western targets to commit jihad against, the Muslim terrorists no longer need to target their own, with Western/Christian targets taking a priority.
The key point being that jihad is a phenomenon unique and attributable to Islam, and always will be.
Out of the links you posted about Turkey, only 2 were perpetrated by turks. The rest were Syrians, chechens, and one of the articles you posted has to do with an assassination in Russia perpetrated by non Turkish Muslims from the Caucasus region. It has zero relevance to your point...
The point was obviously that Islamism has spread to Turkey, a previously secular nation which has slowly drifted towards being an Islamic country under Erdogan's rule, and has allowed in numerous Muslim refugees. With it, came a massive increase to religiously-motivated terrorist attacks in the region. We can also allow Islamism to spread into the West, if we continue be naive as fuck towards the religion and what the Islamic faith entails.
And yes there was an attempted muslim uprising followed by an intense crackdown on Muslims by Tajikistan. People aren't even allowed to grow long beards over there. But such a bastion of islamism huh...
Iraq wasn't a bastion of Islamism either until the secular dictator was over-thrown. Non-Islamic, secular regimes in the Middle East can only be upheld through tyranny and military intervention. If the population is allowed to democratically elect their leaders, they, almost without exception, choose to elect an Islamic leader rather than a secular one.
I expect that Tajikistan will see an increasing amount of proponents for Sharia law, if the current regime is toppled over. Right now, Russia is playing a big part in why the regime continues to stay in power, and why the Islamic element continues to be suppressed.
And your point about a African nations not having as strong a sense of Islamism is just another convenient way of changing the goal posts. That load bull crap said at certain percantages of Islamism, this is supposed to happen. Now you're changing the narrative.
It is not so much about "changing the goal posts" as much as it is about acknowledging that there are cultural differences to Sub-Saharan African Muslims, and Middle Eastern/North African Muslims. The refugees coming in are largely from the Middle Eastern region, not Sub-Saharan Africa, and the theory about Islamism increasing according to the level of Muslim population holds weight around that region. Most Middle Eastern Muslims wish to live their life according to Sharia, and would prefer to see a government which imposes Sharia law on the citizens. Most of the countries which are deemed to be secular despite a Muslim majority, are countries where secularism is upheld through the use of force.