Chris Lee Strikes Again (round 4)

I guess there is an argument to be made for them not being too easily fireable (if they score against the company's milkcow, the company shouldn't be able to fire them for that). But there's a level at which, if a judge sucks across so many different fights... Why is he still a judge?
Sure maybe a retribution clause, I think that's what you're getting at with the milk cow comment, would be fair enough. I think there needs to at least be some sort of mechanism were a sanctioning body, Hell maybe it's even made up of current UFC fighters, get to interview/question a judge on a highly questionable decision. They should have to publicly defend their positions if it's a highly controversial call. Say something like 70%+ of MMA decisions go the other way, or some criteria to be determined
 
One more addition for betters, but also anyone in general as it points out the nonsense. Kai was a -400 on the live betting odds with one minute to go. He clearly dominated the last minute, so would have been an even bigger favorite before the fight ended, although the books close betting lines in the final seconds. Makes you wonder why sports books who don't like to lose money would pay serious plus money on Albazi if he actually won the fight. If you could get +300 odds in the final moments of a fight/game regularly, anyone with mediocre knowledge of any sport could take it for millions
 
Back
Top