- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 52,743
- Reaction score
- 24,841
Youre entire argument is whatboutism. It is spurrious because if one would acknowledge any validity to your argument, no meat eater can ever criticise any person of animal cruelty, including a person who tortures aninmals, burns them alive, mutilates them alive etc.. See how god dam ridiculous your argument is.Pull your head out of your ass and go educate yourself on how the farming of animals is actually done. Here:
https://www.aspca.org/animal-cruelty/farm-animal-welfare
https://animalequality.org/news/why-factory-farming-is-the-largest-cause-of-animal-abuse-in-history/
https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/factory-farming/
https://mercyforanimals.org/the-problem/
And on, and on, and on..............you're woefully ill informed or just plain stupid.
The difference between you and I is that I fully acknowledge what is actually happening and don't try to claim some moral high ground for my choice to eat meat. Nor am I a hypocrite about it. You on the other hand are like a little kid running around with your eyes closed and your fingers stuck in your ears yelling 'NO NO NO NO NO NO'.
Oh, and here is some more stats on non farmed animals being abused.
https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/animal-cruelty-facts-and-stats
You are a sanctimonius twerp who thinks there is no degrees of difference between barbaric treatment of animals and eating meat. You are like the guy who thinks all lies are equal in impact.
Using your same asinine argument, no one in the US can criticise China for waging genocide on the Uyghurs because America has its own racial issues. Yet a reasonable person can clearly notice there is a huge difference in how minorities are treated in both countries. Using your own logic, one can not criticise ISIS because our own country has done shitty things abroad.