Social Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed

[EndlessCritic]

Whatever you say, dude. Charlie Kirk was a bigot and a Christian nationalist.

You are entitled to believe whatever you want. The man was repugnant and did tremendous harm to American society.

There are lots of racist people in TPUSA who did lots of racist stuff. Probably just a coincidence.

I would agree with calling him a bigoted Christian who wanted America to become a Christian nation, believed that America was under attack, and that America could only be saved by becoming a Christian nation.

I don't know how you measure how much harm he actually did.

We must appreciate that people like Charlie Kirk do not come out of nowhere. They are the products of reactionary forces and complex histories. The alternative to Charlie Kirk is not a magical utopia. The alternative to Charlie Kirk is the Nick Fuentes' of the world, and people who would advocate violence against their opponents.

 

[ermac88]

Racist people have always labelled non-whites who don't follow the "correct" script as tokens.

What you typed is incoherent makes absolutely no sense.

i didn't say anything about "whites."

Outliars that side with groups that actively opress them or expressively state opposition to their best interests are by definition, tokens.

Ie. A person of color in the US against the civil rights act of 1964 and used on an opposition platform, is a token.

 

[Pierce 34]

this is something you cant get over, just learn how to hide it better overtime

 

[BAM]

What you typed is incoherent makes absolutely no sense.

i didn't say anything about "whites."

Outliars that side with groups that actively opress them or expressively state opposition to their best interests are by definition, tokens.

Ie. A person of color in the US against the civil rights act of 1964 and used on an opposition platform, is a token.

Tokenism is a criticism of the org, political movement or corporation of cynically expoiting a minority of some kind (race, sex, sexual orientation) to create a false impression of diversity and inclusion without comitting to any real substantive position. The person being used can be unaware of it. The right will use terms like "woke" and "token" to criticise things like Star Wars for doing this.

When people start using terms like grifter, sellout or "pick me" - that's going after the integrity of the individual.

For influencers, I tend to use both to criticise both dynamics. It's a common occurence given the money and status involved.

But if it's just a regular person that disagrees with the majority opinion, that's just a minority view. No big deal, being able to think for ourselves and reject group think is a positive, even if I disagree with their reasoning.