• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Cellphone and Computer Searches at U.S. Border Rise Under Trump

waiguoren

Double Yellow Card
Double Yellow Card
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
15,112
Reaction score
0
Good on the ACLU and EFF for challenging this.

What part of the US Constitution authorizes the federal government to search cell phones and computers?

This is an issue that shouldn't be politicized. Law enforcement is always trying to expand its ability to spy on us, no matter if Rs or Ds have power.

----------------

Link


WASHINGTON — Customs officers stationed at the American border and at airports searched an estimated 30,200 cellphones, computers and other electronic devices of people entering and leaving the United States last year — an almost 60 percent increase from 2016, according to Homeland Security Department data released on Friday.

Despite the surge, Customs and Border Protection officials said the searches affected fewer than 1 percent of the more than 300 million travelers who arrived in the United States last year.

Homeland Security officials say border searches are an important investigative tool and are used sparingly by its agents.

“In this digital age, border searches of electronic devices are essential to enforcing the law at the U.S. border and to protecting the American people,” said John Wagner, the deputy executive assistant commissioner at Customs and Border Protection.

Mr. Wagner said the agency was committed to preserving the rights and civil liberties of travelers whose devices are searched.

Searching people and packages at the border is a longstanding practice, dating back to the founding of the United States. But they have taken an added significance in the Trump administration, which has promised to limit both illegal and legal immigration to the United States.

Privacy and immigration advocates see the increase in searches as part of the administration's overall immigration agenda, which includes a travel ban against several Muslim-majority countries and rescinding an Obama-era program that allowed undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children to live and work in the country without fear of being deported.

The Trump administration also has proposed a 1,000-mile border wall — along nearly half the Southwest border — that Homeland Security officials estimate would cost about $18 billion, according to a congressional aide who spoke Friday on condition of anonymity. The new wall tally and length of the border wall was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Privacy activists and those who have been detained at the border say the examination of their phones, computers and hard drives are invasive and violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

But courts have long held that those protections do not apply at the border or airports because of the government’s compelling interest in combating crime and terrorism.

A 2014 Supreme Court ruling did say, however, that law enforcement needed to have a warrant to search electronic devices when a person was being arrested.

But since that case did not involve a search at the border, Homeland Security officials said the ruling did not apply to Customs officers, who argue that the examination of electronic devices is akin to searching the luggage of travelers entering or exiting the United States. Customs officials also say the search of electronic devices has led to the arrests of individuals caught with illegal material, such as child pornography.

But privacy advocates say smartphones and other personal electronics contain far more sensitive personal information, such as banking and medical records, than suitcases.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have filed a lawsuit in Boston arguing that a warrant should be required to search such devices at the border. Ten American citizens and one immigrant — including several Muslims and other minorities — are named in the lawsuit.

The Trump administration has asked a judge to dismiss the case.
 
God forbid they find out I'm a Sherdogger holy shit
 
If there are no laptop/cellphone checkpoints at our borders, and people with bad intentions know it, what dangers are we exposed to, or what dangers increase because there is a security vulnerability there? What information can travel into the country that can't travel on the internet? The burden has to be on the government to show that it's a problem. Doesn't this all just boil down to finding terrorist plans sitting on a computer? We can justify all kinds of searches with that excuse. I'm not saying it's impossible that the government can show the need to do this- what they are doing is theoretically sound when it comes to security- but it's good that it's being challenged.
 
Check phones and computers?



Go Fuck Yourself would be my response.


But I'll gladly show the inside of my asshole on request.
 
It's only gonna get worse. Government by nature grabs more and more power
 
Should require a warrant, I agree.
 
I guess this is the extreme vetting they've been clamoring on about.
 
I dont have much of an issue TBH.

I mean they cant force you isnt? they just deny entry?
 
I dont have much of an issue TBH.

I mean they cant force you isnt? they just deny entry?

Pretty good leverage if you ask me. You fly 10 hours to the US to have a customs officer ask you to open your computer and hand over passwords for you or get sent back.
 
Pretty good leverage if you ask me. You fly 10 hours to the US to have a customs officer ask you to open your computer and hand over passwords for you or get sent back.

Just uninstall all social media and the such.
 
Just uninstall all social media and the such.
Yeah there are ways of circumventing it, but government isn't supposed to have this authority in the first place. If you really want the Feds to have this power, you need a Constitutional amendment.
 
Thanx Trump
These actions did not start under Trump. Even if Trump lowers the number of searches to zero, a future president will try again.

We should take the long view. If people aren't aware that the federal government does not have the authority to do this, then the Congress should take explicit action to prevent these searches.
 
On one hand, I couldn't care less if the looked through my phone or lap top, on the other hand as long as it isn't a fake phone or lap top disguised hiding a weapon then what's the danger? Why look at content?
Seems an overreach to me.
 
I dont have much of an issue TBH.

I mean they cant force you isnt? they just deny entry?
CBP cannot deny entry to any US Citizen, but they can confiscate your cellphone/laptop and send it to a lab for government geeks/hackers to hack your cellphone.

also, they need an articulate reason to open your cellphone/laptop ( i.e. you were charged (not convicted) for child molestation 40 years ago, or you are a single male who makes frequent trips to Thailand for 'tourism' purpose, or they see you have a little kid toys in your bags during baggage exam but you travel by yourself, or they see you have ISIS posters in your baggage, etc.)
 
Back
Top