Canelos team forgot to pay ahead

[Seano]

Say something new or I'm moving on. I've been repeating myself for a while while you have this tantrum.

 

[goldennirvana]

Your pattern is predictable.

If only I was as sophisticated as you and responded to gay sex fantasies.

You Canelitas are GHEY.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

Another Canelita still butthurt over his hero being schooled and dominated. LOL

I rooted against Canelo in most of his big fights & was a GGG fan. Was hoping he would fight Charlo & that Charlo would shock the world and beat him.
This is case in point why your opinion or findings don't matter. You have no credibility & just make shit up out of thin air. Was Bigfoot in on it too?

 

[goldennirvana]

Bivol won, you're calling it a fix but I don't understand what a fixed fight is?

I said the fix WAS IN, dummy. That means it was set up to be a fix, but Canelo had to do more to justify it. Why didn't he get the decision? Because there was absolutely no other rounds which the judges could give him because Bivol won so convincingly.

People say the fix was in when the wrong guy wins. The right guy won in this case.

Surely you can't be this fucking dumb, lol. It wasn't a razor-thin victory, Seano. It was a very dominant win for Bivol, yet the scorecards do not show that. They show corruption.

You don't even know what "the fix was in" means.

Seriously, this truly ranks as the dumbest argument I've ever heard on here. I honestly can't think of something this dumb.

You've said. And you don't have a single counter-argument why it's false.

You think Bivol only scraped by. You're the biggest joke on this forum, Canelita.

From now on you shall be known as 'King of the Canelitas'. Enjoy your title, son. You earned it!

 

[Seano]

If only I was as sophisticated as you and responded to gay sex fantasies.

You Canelitas are GHEY.

Well come on, when you say you're not obsessed with me, such a response is warranted. You clearly think about me a lot.

 

[goldennirvana]

Well come on, when you say you're not obsessed with me, such a response is warranted. You clearly think about me a lot.

Me telling you I'm not obsessed with you warrants you bringing up a gay sex fantasy? That doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.

Liberals in particular, when you argue with them, it'll always end with them saying something about taking it up the ass or sucking cock

Oh dear Seano, oh very dear indeed!

 

[Seano]

I said the fix WAS IN, dummy. That means it was set up to be a fix, but Canelo had to do more to justify it. Why didn't he get the decision? Because there was absolutely no other rounds which the judges could give him because Bivol won so convincingly.



Surely you can't be this fucking dumb, lol. It wasn't a razor-thin victory, Seano. It was a very dominant win for Bivol, yet the scorecards do not show that. They show corruption.

You don't even know what "the fix was in" means.



You've said. And you don't have a single counter-argument why it's false.

You think Bivol only scraped by. You're the biggest joke on this forum, Canelita.

From now on you shall be known as 'King of the Canelitas'. Enjoy your title, son. You earned it!

You're just repeating the same dumb shit. Who was responsible for this fix? Who was the mastermind? How did all 4 judges have the same score? Was there a mexican mafioso in the audience giving hand signals? Did he change his mind because he had so much respect for Bivols heart? Was it Eddie Hearn, telling them how to score it with secret earpieces all the judges were wearing? Why did they favor Canelo but not enough for him to get even a split loss, let alone a draw or win? Why did the same judge that favored Golovkin over Canelo show Canelo favoritism (but not too much favoritism!) in this one but still have him losing? How is it the 3 trained judges had it exactly the same?

 

[Seano]

Me telling you I'm not obsessed with you warrants you bringing up a gay sex fantasy? That doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.



Oh dear Seano, oh very dear indeed!

 

[goldennirvana]

You're just repeating the same dumb shit. Who was responsible for this fix? Who was the mastermind? How did all 4 judges have the same score? Was there a mexican mafioso in the audience giving hand signals? Did he change his mind because he had so much respect for Bivols heart? Was it Eddie Hearn, telling them how to score it with secret earpieces all the judges were wearing? Why did they favor Canelo but not enough for him to get even a split loss, let alone a draw or win? Why did the same judge that favored Golovkin over Canelo show Canelo favoritism (but not too much favoritism!) in this one but still have him losing? How is it the 3 trained judges had it exactly the same?

"fixes have never happened in boxing, ever" - Seano (King of the Canelitas)

 

[goldennirvana]

You owned yourself so bad, gay porn boy.

 

[Seano]

You owned yourself so bad, gay porn boy.

Nah, I'm still making my argument. My post was to insult you but I'm still posting on the topic , it wasn't to end the discussion. You're the one who ran out of ideas here.

 

[Seano]

"fixes have never happened in boxing, ever" - Seano (King of the Canelitas)

Fix is a rigged outcome. Bivol won on all 3 judges scorecards by one round.

 

[goldennirvana]

Nah, I'm still making my argument. My post was to insult you but I'm still posting on the topic , it wasn't to end the discussion. You're the one who ran out of ideas here.

By your own reasoning, you're a loser. You had no argument so you had to resort to a deviant, morally corrupt comment about "sucking cock". I then used your own words against you, simply by quoting your disgust at people who bring up "sucking cock" in an argument.

You don't have an argument, Seano. You have just admitted you believe fixes have never happened in boxing, ever.

 

[Seano]

By your own reasoning, you're a loser. You had no argument so you had to resort to a deviant, morally corrupt comment about "sucking cock". I then used your own words against you, simply by quoting your disgust at people who bring up "sucking cock" in an argument.

You don't have an argument, Seano. You have just admitted you believe fixes have never happened in boxing, ever.

I never said anything like that at all.
I'm waiting for your responses to my arguments. I've asked you over and over and then you went searching through my post history to prove you're not obsessed with me. I've asked you over and over to explain the logistics of this fix. Who was responsible for this shadiness you see so clearly. You've avoided all my questions, every one. You've made laughable arguments about police being called in if the judges gave Canelo 1 more round. You can't justify that. You can't explain how the judges scored early rounds for Caenlo unanimously, early rounds he almost always loses in big fights. Why the same judge that had him losing to Golovkin slightly robbed Bivol in this one but not enough to give Canelo the win.

Answer these questions.

 

[goldennirvana]

Fix is a rigged outcome. Bivol won on all 3 judges scorecards by one round.

The outcome was rigged, but Canelo had to do more to justify it. Again, you're not understanding how a fix happens. You can't just give any round you like to the fixed fighter, because then it becomes so obvious it will just kill boxing. The fix is that despite Bivol dominating, according to the judges he only just won. No sane person believes such a thing. Those behind the fix believed the fight would be much closer and therefore plausible deniability would be applied.

The fact you can't understand this says a lot about your level of intellect. No wonder you had to bring up cock sucking.

 

[Seano]

The outcome was rigged, but Canelo had to do more to justify it. Again, you're not understanding how a fix happens. You can't just give any round you like to the fixed fighter, because then it becomes so obvious it will just kill boxing. The fix is that despite Bivol dominating, according to the judges he only just won. No sane person believes such a thing. Those behind the fix believed the fight would be much closer and therefore plausible deniability would be applied.

The fact you can't understand this says a lot about your level of intellect. No wonder you had to bring up cock sucking.

A rigged outcome is when someone gets a win they don't deserve. Canelo had to do more to win more rounds to get the ....round he didn't deserve....?

 

[goldennirvana]

Who was responsible for this shadiness you see so clearly. You've avoided all my questions, every one. You've made laughable arguments about police being called in if the judges gave Canelo 1 more round. You can't justify that. You can't explain how the judges scored early rounds for Caenlo unanimously, early rounds he almost always loses in big fights. Why the same judge that had him losing to Golovkin slightly robbed Bivol in this one but not enough to give Canelo the win.

Answer these questions.

Your questions are stupid because they imply fixes have never happened in boxing. You're THAT dense.

Worst poster on the forum. Confirmed.

 

[Seano]

Your questions are stupid because they imply fixes have never happened in boxing. You're THAT dense.

Worst poster on the forum. Confirmed.

That sounds like your white flag to me. If you can't answer those questions then you know you're making shit up. I want you to explain this controversy you so clearly see. I want you to defend your arguments that others have called you on. Very telling that you refuse.

 

[goldennirvana]

A rigged outcome is when someone gets a win they don't deserve. Canelo had to do more to win more rounds to get the ....round he didn't deserve....?

Fixes happen in different ways. This kind of fix is clearly the kind where the judges are in on it, and so they scored the fight scandalously.

There were no other rounds the judges could possibly give to Canelo because he lost them so convincingly. You're so dumb you don't understand this. LOL

Canelo had to do more to justify giving him rounds he still would've lost, but because he lost them so convincingly, the judges couldn't possibly give them to him. How in the fuck are you not understanding this?

 

[goldennirvana]

That sounds like your white flag to me. If you can't answer those questions then you know you're making shit up. I want you to explain this controversy you so clearly see. I want you to defend your arguments that others have called you on. Very telling that you refuse.

But I've already defeated you so badly, you had to resort to gay sex fantasy insults. I then owned you by quoting your own words and you desperately tried to wriggle out of it. By your own reasoning, you are a loser.

You don't believe fixes have ever happened in boxing, Seano. You are a joke. Run along.

I've defended my arguments. And you're the only one who's called me up on it. And we saw how that went for you. You couldn't even provide a single coherent counter-argument. lol