Opinion Candace Owens Sits Down With Nick Fuentes

Mack Yancy

Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
4,524
Reaction score
4,802


Well after she publically said that she'd never sit down with him, because she'd get banned. She sat down with him. This is really fascinating, because Candace strategy since leaving the Daily Wire is to try to scoop up all the factions of the right that her peers (Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, Russell Brand) simply can't. She's done a very good job getting the celeb gossip crowd, science conspiracy and true crime investigation crowd, and she's made some headway by courting the nazis.

What she's tried to do here is show that she isn't afraid to talk to anyone no matter how controversial, but she's also not stupid enough to tie herself to Nick Fuentes at hip. Not because he's a nazi per say, but because he's unpredictable, spiteful and brand kryptonite. So this very cordial discussion she tries to maintain a gap between her and him and it turns sort of a debate.

Looking forward to sherdoggers opinions on this discussion.
 
fuentes more of a J than a Nazi IMO
 
Listened to 50 minutes of that before saying to myself ‘what am I doing?’

That is like two high schoolers arguing. Almost an hour of drivel about a previous podcast guest.
Which one do you think came off better?

@Rob Battisti

Let me know what you think about when they discuss israel.


@Tatra

They get into race and IQ in the last third of the video.
 
Looking forward to sherdoggers opinions on this discussion.

Typical playbook from those in the political commentary influencer space unhappy with their current audience stagnation. Network within your political affiliation bubble and dont come off as confrontational. For the hope is to siphon off segments of your competitors audience by presenting yourself as the superior in messaging.
 
The first half of the interview gets bogged down a bit with competition for followers. Candace Owens comes off worse as trying to lecture Fuentes about approach. There is an extended portion around the one hour mark where the two argue about whether Owens lied about having no communication with Fuentes when she actually did. I understand why this argument was important to them in terms of credibility, but it was a bit tedious.

Once Owens and Fuentes got to their shared experience of being cancelled, things got more polite. They also discussed the accusation of Fuentes being a Fed, which Fuentes principally attributes to Tucker Carlson, interesting in view of Tucker Carlson's wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucker_Carlson
'After college, Carlson tried to join the Central Intelligence Agency, but his application was denied, after which he decided to pursue a career in journalism with the encouragement of his father, who advised him that "they'll take anybody".'

The last part of the interview was the most interesting because they began discussing a controversial topic, nature versus nurture with regards to racial intelligence. Owens and Fuentes agree that Ashkenazi Jews and Japanese score best on IQ tests and American whites score better than American blacks, but they disagree on whether there is a genetic component to racial differences in intelligence. I'm linking the interview to start at this portion if you are interested:
 
Typical playbook from those in the political commentary influencer space unhappy with their current audience stagnation. Network within your political affiliation bubble and dont come off as confrontational. For the hope is to siphon off segments of your competitors audience by presenting yourself as the superior in messaging.

wtf_talking_about_wolf_of_wallstreet.gif
 
Mexico is a place in which people of various races and ethnicities live.
The vast majority of them being Mesitzo (or however you spell it) Nick is of roughly 12% amerindian descent through his half mexican dad.
 
the question is who'd you rather ?
 
Back
Top