- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 6,563
- Reaction score
- 14
I think it would just be a judgement call based on subjective analysis of things such as: did it look like the offender saw the open throat and threw a strike that would be very likely to land there and do damage?How the hell could they determine whether it was targeted on purpose?
Were there other legal openings that the offender passed up on to land the illegal strike or, conversly and maybe even more damningly, were there NO other openings but the throat so the offender decided to just strike it anyway?
I'm just guessing and would like to hear what others think might constitute clues of culpability for an illegal strike.
I guess another would be if the fighter has a history of exploiting the illegal strike in question, eg Jon Jones or Travis Browne with eye-pokes or Palhares and leg destruction/eye gouging or Kongo and cup checks.