You literally called a 30 round magazine a 30 round clip. And those are stripper clips that are only used to quickly load mags. And the M1 Garand was the service rifle of WWII not WWI. Do you know what you're talking about at all?Not for an M16. This is the clip used to load the magazine. Plus, you know very well I'm talking about 'magazines' loaded to fit into a weapon, not a clip to fit a WWI M1 Garand.
Why do gun nuts like to nitpick the irrelevant points like this instead of addressing the core argument? I mean @Phr3121 is still wrong since the high capacity magazines the ban is referring to magazines any over 10 rounds, not over 30 as he seems to think. But instead you want to focus on the negligible details in his post.
Yeap, my mistake, WWII, but the point being it was clip fed. Clip and magazines are terms used interchangeably. Plus, I'm talking about 'magazines' that hold over 30 rounds of ammunition. Like these:
Exactly, so a 30 round 'magazine' would be over 10.
Don't forget those hypocrites who are above the laws they're supposed to enforce."If guns are outlawed only outlaws (and good, law abiding citizens following their consciences) will have guns."
This is the corrected bumper sticker.
I'm sure the Bloombergs and Feinsteins of the world would still have their armed security in such a scenario.
He already said only muskets should be legal for civilians to own. Poor guy is rattled.
No one on Sherdog is taking any guns away. If someone makes an argument, you should address the substance of the argument. If you also want to point out minor mistakes they made, like calling a magazine a clip, that's fine but don't focus on that to avoid the actual argument at hand. I see gun nuts do that frequently, often with the same minor mistake.
I call people who like guns gun nuts, take offensive if you'd like but none was intended. I hope you don't also find the term fan offensive just because its short for fanatic.
It's really stupid (and makes gun fans look worse, rather than better).
