Bunker Boy signs order to promote racist "Patriotic Education"

You teach that many were against slavery but had to compromise to found the country. That you have to take in to consideration the times when you judge a persons life. You teach how slavery was without telling students that all white people at that time were worthless racist.

You want to teach the truth then tell them that the north didn't fight to free slaves. You teach the south fought over states rights but the main right they fought for was to protect the institution of slavery.

There is a way to love your country and be proud of the good things and still not over look the bad.
OH ok.... So we teach that the founders recognized the importance of freedom that they were willing to go to war because they felt they weren't being represented in the English government..... But that black people being actual property wasn't something worth fighting over.

Lol I don't see how you can make this history seem something so positive. Just teach the shit without a spin or federal government intervention.
 
Oh, since when do Trumptards care about references?? I thought you guys got all your info from bullshit memes?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/14/opinion/sunday/trump-lies-obama-who-is-worse.html

But let me guess, all the references in there are false cause NY Times right?

Actually, my approach was not one of "the references are false", but rather that they are examining Trump with a microscope and Obama with one eye partially open. It is far from conclusive of Obama's lies. NY Times has always been a half-step behind CNN when it comes to the transparency of their globalist agendas.

I've never defended Trump as some bastion of truth, but I just find it odd the hypocrisy and double standard of the left in attacking him for much of the same things they praised prior presidents for, since he is not part of their good ol' boy globalist network.
 
Actually, my approach was not one of "the references are false", but rather that they are examining Trump with a microscope and Obama with one eye partially open. It is far from conclusive of Obama's lies. NY Times has always been a half-step behind CNN when it comes to the transparency of their globalist agendas.

I've never defended Trump as some bastion of truth, but I just find it odd the hypocrisy and double standard of the left in attacking him for much of the same things they praised prior presidents for, since he is not part of their good ol' boy globalist network.

What exactly do you mean by "globalist" and why exactly do you think its bad. Seems like a blanket term people throw around without a clue of what they actually mean.
 
Trump is a wannabe fascist, a moron authoritarian and his base loves it. That said, this move is pretty standard republican stuff. They pander to social justice (their form of it) to keep their base voting for them while continuing to fuck them. Trump is going with the culture war, i.e., social justice, as his 2020 political strategy. Predictable but still dangerous.
 
What exactly do you mean by "globalist" and why exactly do you think its bad. Seems like a blanket term people throw around without a clue of what they actually mean.
Pretty simple really. According to dictionary.com: the attitude or policy of placing the interests of the entire world above those of individual nations.

Why its bad: For one, because the main people trying to drive that train are social engineering scumbags who do not intent to live by the same standards that they want the rest of us to live in. They want it because it gives them more power.
Secondly, because it is effectively larger scale socialism, "bringing up" (temporarily anyway) some countries at the cost of our own. Socialism has almost always resulted in economic and social decay as the rights of the individual are forfeited and the productivity of the individual is given to others regardless of their own. Similarly globalist policies seek to take the wealth and productivity of nations with good policies. It has been historically proven time and time again that it is not a viable construct.

Personally, the idea that there are millions of people voting to take away my individual freedoms and the things I've worked my butt off for, to give them to others who have not worked the way that I have, makes me angry. Peoples priorities naturally are family> community> country.> world. As much as "we are one, caring for the planet as a whole" sounds like a great Beatles song, we aren't hive mind ants able to keep that same social, moral, productive outlook once those priorities are taken away.
 
Last edited:
OH ok.... So we teach that the founders recognized the importance of freedom that they were willing to go to war because they felt they weren't being represented in the English government..... But that black people being actual property wasn't something worth fighting over.

Lol I don't see how you can make this history seem something so positive. Just teach the shit without a spin or federal government intervention.

Do you think it's being taught without spin now? Do you think the democrats on the left don't want even spin?
 
The guy literally had a Karen meltdown

Me pointing out what a hilarious caricature you are of a typical TDS sufferer =/= meltdown.

Nice try though sky screamer.

When you are going to tell me that you are either

1. A giant hypocrite TDS sufferer.

Or

2. A person who is just as disgusted with Obama's lies, as Trump's? Oh, I almost forgot - and still a TDS sufferer.

It's either one or the other.
 
Actually, my approach was not one of "the references are false", but rather that they are examining Trump with a microscope and Obama with one eye partially open. It is far from conclusive of Obama's lies. NY Times has always been a half-step behind CNN when it comes to the transparency of their globalist agendas.

I've never defended Trump as some bastion of truth, but I just find it odd the hypocrisy and double standard of the left in attacking him for much of the same things they praised prior presidents for, since he is not part of their good ol' boy globalist network.
Both guys can be terrible presidents at once. Both things can be true, and they are.
 
Me pointing out what a hilarious caricature you are of a typical TDS sufferer =/= meltdown.

Nice try though sky screamer.

When you are going to tell me that you are either

1. A giant hypocrite TDS sufferer.

Or

2. A person who is just as disgusted with Obama's lies, as Trump's? Oh, I almost forgot - and still a TDS sufferer.

It's either one or the other.

Ok Karen
 
Yeah but look at all the peoples around the world that built first world places and gave other kinds of people equal, or even higher standing. They’re everywhere.....
Huh? I don't get what you're trying to say.
 
Do you think it's being taught without spin now? Do you think the democrats on the left don't want even spin?
Of course it's taught with spin, it's learned with spin, it was originally written with spin. History isn't just unbiased facts, it's a person's biased accounts of facts. You can have two people right now cover the exact same event and ask them to write a story about it using relative facts.

You'll receive two different versions from these people because what they perceive relevant will be different.


My point is let the teachers teach how they want to, don't like what's being taught, teach your kids yourself about history... Give them books you approve of for them to learn
 
Equal rights, unless you are black right?

Unarmed Jacob Blake shot.
Murderer Kyle Rittenhouse softly arrested

692ZvC0zfb2-mRHN12ujB8xOEk0o01VufISHrm8k3Dzr5B7sE4pbxefsxTKCbG2pYH4UYKiSuyGk48YO58zb_NJGxhJLzU7AAKU-3PZ_YSdn6EAy
Do you guys even read or watch the shooting videos? I don't think so. You just hear the key words black, shooting, victim, cops and you get all emotional and bent out of shape about someone that you don't even know. That's a very feminine characteristic in case you weren't aware. Worrying about shit that really has nothing to do with you.

I can't imagine mentally investing in things that don't affect me, or have little affect for that matter. That is a very feminine trait. Worrying about stuff that isn't pertinent to your own bottom line. Women do that, and not only do they worry about stuff that they shouldn't be worried about. Their worrying usually just makes shit worse. For example, you and people like you see someone get killed or hurt and your emotional outrage causes even more deaths, property damage, and destabilization. The way you carry on you would think we are ACTUALLY living in the jim crow era. Your oddly feminine behavior is pretty hiliarious to people like me. My 11 year old daughter even scratches her head when I explain to her why people are burning, looting, rioting, and killing. "what?" she says, "how is doing any of that going to help anything?" You should check that behavior brother, it's not productive.

I will say I don't think Jacob blake should have been shot, a solid RNC could have solved that problem. But let's be real here, the police gave him several chances to comply and not get shot and he made the PERSONAL CHOICE to play chicken with the law.

You can try to spin it however you want, but that man chose to take several actions that went directly against his own self preservation. What a dumbass lol. Why would you or anyone else want to make a martyr out of a dumbass that isn't even smart enough to put self preservation as his top priority? Doesn't even make any sense. Hell Jacob Blakes own mother sounds like even she gets it. Why don't you?
 
Yes, I do. Why wouldn't I? You may not be aware, but the cops shoot plenty of white folk for behaving like Blake did.
You dont think he skin color was the reason why they went after him in the first place? Its reality.
 
Back
Top