- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 52,699
- Reaction score
- 30,862
Whats so bad or impactful about holocaust denial?

Whats so bad or impactful about holocaust denial?

I didn't watch the video or read what he said about Hitler in context or otherwise.
Bryce had a very different perspective not too many years ago, he had little direction and has learned through observation and by doing. Mistakes and "being wrong" are potent opportunities for us to learn, as Bryce has admittedly done. None of us are the same persons we were a decade ago while still being the same person we were at birth, and Bryce is not different, a guy seeking and learning...
As far as a hypothetical Hitler, or anyone we see as evil or bad or wrong, we can imagine a scenario where we have an opportunity to hear them out in a casual setting and get a feel for who they are without supporting them or championing their causes, as a way to gain perspective and seek and learn... And shame on people for being so reactive and in their emotions and part of the herd with no willingness to be objective...
You’re basing this on a couple of false assumptions. For one, plenty of people and companies have wanted to punish people for their vocal support of Israel or Palestine. That’s just a fact, I don’t know where you’ve been. Second, freedom of speech doesn’t mean a company can’t fire you for what you say. You might not like this fact, and I tend to not like it myself, but it is a reality that both parties have taken advantage of when they felt like it and cried about it when it harmed them. Third, only idiots that have gone down the social media conspiracy rabbit holes really deny the holocaust happened.Okay but anyone has a right to "denial". Doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree.
For example, some call what is happening in Palestine now a "holocaust/genocide" and others DENY that. Nobody wants them fired, punished or canceled for believing that.
It's okay to deny that it happened the way THEY tell you it did.
There are countless people, articles, interviews etc... that argue/dispute their interpretation of events.
There are others who agree with their interpretation of events.
Who determines what is "dumb" and what is "informed"?
A lot of gray area here. There are Israeli's/Jews from around the world who question the historical accuracy of the holocaust. It's openly documented but suppressed in the main stream media - which makes people have even more doubts.
Sure but then Dana would look like a hypocrite for professing strongly in his belief of "freedom of speech".
You can't have freedom of speech to criticize, be racist, sexist etc... to everyone in the world EXCEPT Jews.
They are not special.
Really? You don't think most reasonable people would hear Bryce's comments about Hitler being right for going after "greedy Jews" and reasonably assume he's motivated in part by antisemitism?
Most propaganda has a sprinkle of truth, and the idea that Jews were so hated in Germany for no reason at all makes no sense… things are never black/white, and so the strong push to make this topic black/white sets off alarm bells.Arguing that the unjust peace of WWI led to the rise of the Nazis is one thing but Bryce is pretty clearly saying that Nazi propaganda about Jews was at least partly right and that is offensive and wrong.
An assumption is an assumption- not a huge fan under any circumstance. Nonetheless, I’m not familiar with Bryce’s position outside of the snippet that was posted… and honestly I’m more interested in the larger zeitgeist that envelopes this topic in particular.
Due you think there is any room to criticize Jewish culture/norms/behavior that doesn’t fall under the label of “antisemitism?” Is it offensive to highlight factors that led the German people to react so strongly against Jewish people?
To deny historical facts? Yes.You think people have to hate a particular group to question historical narratives?
oh so you're quite literally a nazi sympathizer. nice.Could you ever imagine that some of the popular beliefs about Germany and Nazis is actually propaganda written by their opposition?
A moron like Hitler, instead of contemplating what his group may have done wrong to end up in this scenario, blamed Jews for it.

They were doing same to Japanese in usa
Liberals must be furious that Mitchell has extensively badmouthed Elon Musk.
They would have loved to have blamed this on Musk.
they legit killed over a thousand.Yeah but they weren't killed.
they legit killed thousands.
It isn't offensive, but it is retarded. Anyone with even a basic understanding of history knows that there wasn't anything that the Jews "did" that warranted slaughtering 6 million of them.
It's extremely common to scapegoat minorities when things aren't going well as a way to lay blame for your own problems. Germany got it's ass kicked in WW1, lost territory, was humiliated, bankrupted etc. A moron like Hitler, instead of contemplating what his group may have done wrong to end up in this scenario, blamed Jews for it.
the numbers also aren't as high as i thought so i ninja edited. looks like about 1,800 died in the internment camps. and yes, in sheer scale, they aren't comparable but it's still a horrific atrocity.Fair enough I thought as soon as I made the post that I'd fucked up there.
Not on the same kind of scale as the Holocaust though
what jewish elite do you think existed in the 1920's and 1930's? and what actions of theirs would cause a nation's extermination of 6 million jewsSurely you can see the hypocrisy here. On one hand you say there nothing the Jews did to warrant slaughtering 6 million random Jewish people, which I'd agree with. But then you turn around and claim that the German people deserved 20 years of poverty and destitution. You make no exceptions for the average German citizen, including women and children, that had no say in the situation and may not even supported the war.
You feel totally confidant holding the German people fully accountable for the decisions the German leadership made. If that's the case why can't the Nazis hold Jewish people fully accountable for what the decisions and actions the Jewish elite may have done?
what jewish elite do you think existed in the 1920's and 1930's? and what actions of theirs would cause a nation's extermination of 6 million jews
his story about LGBT groups and trans doctors being targeted first is absolutely correct. those were the first nazi book burnings. he's 100% right. they weren't always run by jews though.According to Bryce they were making everyone gay. That’s one hell of a theory
Its mma. Its a sport where people beat each other up. MOST of them are shitty people. Right down to the Gracies.Nah I think he’s just a bad person.