Brock = modern day Coleman?

[Ken's Sideburns]

very strong,

size and strength advantage over virtually all his opponents

can get away with technical flaws due to strength and size

Very little to no striking skills (besides the herring knockdown)

Are doomed if they can't get their opponent to the ground

Agree?

 

[usfbrah]

I agree. But I think prime Coleman would whoop Brock

 

[chitoortiz]

Modern day Kerr more likely

 

[ortizgnp]

Look at that fucking man.

 

[Summoning]

modern day Bob Sapp.

Coleman doesn´t fear brawl and trade punches.

 

[Death By Samson]

I'll buy that.

 

[Pierced7681]

I agree. But I think prime Coleman would whoop Brock

Coleman ducked Brock and ran to 205

 

[gfunkwave]

Modern day Kerr more likely

That's an insult to Kerr. And to Coleman as well TS. Brock would be more like Dan Severn.

 

[Ken's Sideburns]

modern day Bob Sapp.

Coleman doesn´t fear brawl and trade punches.

I really don't recall him brawling in any fights, Moreso shooting doubles from 10 yards out most of the time and usually getting them. You'll have to remind me

 

[Ken's Sideburns]

That's an insult to Kerr. And to Coleman as well TS. Brock would be more like Dan Severn.

Severn was never touted as a freak athlete wrestler the way Brock Coleman and Kerr was

 

[Mr Wings]

I had that thought last night.

Obviously they have different GNP techniques, and Brock probably has better cardio, but essentially they're pretty similar.

Oh yeah, and I respect them both as fighters, but I'm not the biggest fan of that style.

 

[Thunderflash500]

Nobody is like Brock

 

[Haj01]

Wrestling is by far the best most dominant style!

 

[Kneeuinthenutz]

Coleman was a much better fighter. Just nowhere near as big.

 

[Fyreborn]

Brock is more evolved, but Coleman was better relative to his competition than Brock is now.

Coleman ducked Brock and ran to 205

When he was an old geezer.

He'd shriveled up by then.

 

[Combat Wombatt]

very strong,

size and strength advantage over virtually all his opponents

can get away with technical flaws due to strength and size

Very little to no striking skills (besides the herring knockdown)

Are doomed if they can't get their opponent to the ground

Agree?

Lesnar has subs too and he also knocked down Couture and TKO'd him.



The big thing is, how many fighters can he not get down in the UFC? I think he can take them all down.

 

[Mr Wings]

I really don't recall him brawling in any fights, Moreso shooting doubles from 10 yards out most of the time and usually getting them. You'll have to remind me

Yeah I'm with you awaiting that reminder too. I 'thought' (knew) Coleman was never a stand and trade fighter.

 

[Uncle Termite]

Coleman was a much better fighter. Just nowhere near as big.

No way you are wrong.....Lesnar is stronger and much smarter ...he also trains in actual submissions so hes harder to submit.Coleman was notoriously susceptible to subs and never advanved as a fighter is why he lost to average guys like Pete Williamss a novice kick boxer. Lesnars GNP also makes Colemans look weak ,overall a much better fighter than Mark was .

Coleman was juiced to the gills as well,even Pride Coleman would be ineffective against the lesnar last night,two different talents.

 

[Mr Wings]

Lesnar has subs too and he also knocked down Couture and TKO'd him.

The big thing is, how many fighters can he not get down in the UFC? I think he can take them all down.

Lesnar has one win via submission hold, Coleman has 4 (including an arm triangle, just like Brock).

 

[mrsenor]

That's an insult to Kerr. And to Coleman as well TS. Brock would be more like Dan Severn.

dan can take a punch so could kerr