- Joined
- Feb 18, 2022
- Messages
- 5,283
- Reaction score
- 18,594
timestamped.
“It’s strange to me that it’s okay for Dana to go against his fighters and devalue them and he’s lying or call another guy a f****** dummy because he had a conspiracy about UFC 279 cause there’s some smoke there,”
“Dana lies about it then people want to get mad at me, ‘Oh, dude. Come on. You think Dana would actually do that at UFC 279? Brendan needs a handler’ ... Do I? Or does your boy need a handler? I’m not the one playing grab-ass with Mark Zuckerberg, letting him rent out [the UFC Apex], shutting it down for his entertainment. You should have ran that by me, right? I don’t need a handler, these guys need a handler.”
“Somebody should’ve gotten in the ear of Dana and Mark Zuckerberg and been like, ‘Hey, you two rich, privileged f***s, come over here,’”
“‘Let me tell you something. Do not ban the media, do not not allow fans to attend this event, it affects the fighters. What’s our first priority here? The fighters,’ That’s what you say, we know you’re lying. Just because this guy is a billionaire and stole a f****** app called Facebook off two twins doesn’t make this guy special. He became a fan last f****** week, quit posting s***. You’re driving away your fanbase.”
LOL. This is funny. A week ago Joe Rogan called Brendan Schaub stupid because of his conspiracy theory regarding the matchup change in UFC 279, and said Brendan needs a handler.
Idk why he blamed the handler comments on Dana when it was Joe Rogan's comment.
This guy seems really affraid to criticize Joe.
What do my sherbros think?