- Joined
- Apr 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,237
- Reaction score
- 0
If you were to compete in combat sports, which would you want to do first? Let say your 22 years old, do 10 years in one combat sports, then at 32 years old, move to the other combat sports.
boxing. Most money one can earn by fighting. More international fame. And since boxing is a combat sport that is deeply rooted in many cultures, you're more likely to be remembered in history.
Then, kickboxing. Since I would already be very good at boxing (assuming I was a world champ who made millions) it would be easier to transition. Plus if I wanted to get into MMA, I would try out kickboxing/mt and grappling comps to test the waters.
Then, MMA.
I'm not gonna make an arguement over what's the toughest, but boxing at the elite level is incredibly tough and horrendous. No other combat sport requires you to take 12 rounds (36minutes) of punishment. Muay Thai matches 5 rounds? K-1 matches are 3 rounds unless the judges can't decide who won. Title fights in MMA are 25 minutes.
Imagine how much you have to condition yourself to fight 12 rounds of eating punches. Can you imagine eating punches from a guy like Cotto (a guy who's fractured a person's face) for 36 minutes? With the huge (bigger than MT and MMA) talent pool of professional boxing, it takes incredible athleticism and mental fortitude to fight at the elite level. Not saying athletes of other combat sports aren't tough or athletic, but you have to factor in length of matches and overall size of the sport.
And on boxers not being able to transition to MMA, how many elite boxers actually do transition to MMA? Some nobody with a few four rounders sucking at MMA isn't exactly representative of the whole sport. I can make the arguement that BJJ guys suck at MMA since I train with BJJers who fight in MMA and are horrible at it. But you know how stupid that argument is. Not to mention the thread wasn't even about boxers going into MMA.
So I guess it's better to start off in an individual sport and focus on it than to take mma classes or several different fighting art classes at the same time?
So I guess it's better to start off in an individual sport and focus on it than to take mma classes or several different fighting art classes at the same time?
Wow. I must be the only one that thinks boxers have the worst time transitioning to MMA. Out of my experiences with fighters I train with, boxers have a very difficult time transitioning because of the stance and the way the weight is carried, and the bobbing and weaving... there are many things that boxers drill into their heads to become instinctual for defense that would get you wrecked in MMA or MT because it would leave you open to a kick, knee, clinch, elbow, take down, etc.
It's very hard for boxers to transition to kicking because the weight has be moved backwards. Even if they are flexible, it usually takes a long time to get this. Boxers have to unlearn some things that are highly desired in boxing to compete in other styles... which is very hard to do because instinct takes over sometimes. It can be done, and it is done all the time, but it seems like it takes longer than other styles.
I don't know about it taking more of a toll on the body. Maybe on the head and neck, but MT and KB wrecks your legs and shins, submissions kill your joints... they're all pretty bad.
Chonbody... IDK... I really wouldn't say the training is more demanding than MT! not at all.