Boxing Discussion III

[wack3d]

looks like the bookies have ryder way ahead though.. i kinda agree but still worried about the judging =/

 

[Sham5916910]

If it goes to judges we sweet man

 

[wack3d]

If it goes to judges we sweet man

i took some on draw just in case lol +3000 @ unibet

 

[Sham5916910]

Come on two rounds!

 

[robot]

haha well played

Worked out well. Now on Linares for the main. Have him straight up and in 7-12. Hedged with Crolla 7-12 a little.

GL all

 

[wack3d]

come on judges!

 

[Sham5916910]

Dont be a fuckin split. I dont think it will be but commentators got me worried

 

[Sham5916910]

Dont like his long wait

 

[wack3d]

omfg fml...fucking dirty fixers

 

[Sham5916910]

Wtf!

 

[Sham5916910]

Terrible terrible

 

[Sham5916910]

Ryder was -2800 on lb in r10

 

[wack3d]

i knew it and did not hedge anough corupt boxing judging as always.. betfair even had arnfield at +1900 in r12

 

[Sham5916910]

Linares aint getting the dec

 

[Gambling Man]

I had that as being very close and expected a narrow decision or split in Ryder's favour. I wouldn't call it a robbery but I have no idea how one judge scored it so wide.

 

[null]

I had nothing on it but that Ryder/Arnfield fight was way closer than those scorecards ended up being.

 

[wack3d]

all the bookies had arnfield at +1000 - +1900 when the fight ended.. i would say that qualify's as a robbery =/

 

[wack3d]

on Crolla -117 for the ME

 

[Gambling Man]

I only looked at B365s odds but I thought they were off from the start. They had Arnfield at +600 during the middle rounds when I (and I think Paulie M in the commentary) had him slightly ahead.

I think quite a few of those early rounds were very tight and the books seemed to give them all to Ryder...obviously the judges didn't. Although I'm not sure one of them was actually watching the fight.

 

[Sham5916910]

No clue on this one will lb it