Law Boxer with male XY chromosomes wins olympic bout in 46 seconds via KO

she is very brave. it takes great courage, big balls, and a whole lot of testicular fortitude to win an olympic gold medal in your division while facing hatred, loathing, and jealousy from a group of woman-hating bigots on the other side of the world. let's all give this beautiful lady a round of applause for her
accomplishments.

4b6282a9c630b61acb3abda7a8514d12
Where is her adams apple
 
Did they release their test results?
Yes, Sistem Tip Laboratory from Istanbul (License Number: 194-MRK). The laboratory detected results that didn’t match the eligibility criteria for IBA women’s events.
 
Yes, Sistem Tip Laboratory from Istanbul (License Number: 194-MRK). The laboratory detected results that didn’t match the eligibility criteria for IBA women’s events.
I mean something not vague like that and somethingp that is indisputable.
 
They should not compete if they test higher for testosterone than the allowable limit.
I actually agree.

I just think, by that logic, the problem isn't chromosomes - it's testosterone levels. It seems more normal for me to not have a female boxer with a penis than to have to do a chromosome test to figure out what they "really are".

So, I would think the obvious answer should be to let these women compete and everyone should argue about testing for testosterone levels.

I think the opposing side would argue that the systemic advantage from being born with de la Chappelle syndrome would be akin to someone juicing (or in your example - an XY fighter) who just cuts out or uses blockers for enough time to pass the test clean.
 
So, is your position that people with de la Chapelle Syndrome (XX chromes w/ a penis + elevated testosterone) should be fighting in the women's division?
Bruh, your link says XX male , clearly has a penis , and would not have a uterus, primarily a male, what’s so difficult about that?
 
Bruh, your link says XX male , clearly has a penis , and would not have a uterus, primarily a male, what’s so difficult about that?
The difficulty is you guys just told me XX = female and the Y = male

edit - oh fuck sorry if that was sarcasm lol
 
What i learned is that conservatives believe that men actually can have a vagina, who would have thought that a year ago.
What I learned is that liberals believe having a vagina is what makes you a woman, who would have thought that a year ago.
 
An adult human female possessing XX chromosomes.
So if she has a Y chromosone shes a man?
What I learned is that liberals believe having a vagina is what makes you a woman, who would have thought that a year ago.
If she was born a woman raised as a woman and identify as a woman and have a vagina liberals believe its a woman i don't think anything have changed from a year ago. Conservatives on the other hand confuses me.
 
So if she has a Y chromosone shes a man?
"she"'s definitely an anomaly. Women don't have a Y chromosome.
If she was born a woman
was she?
raised as a woman
irrelevant
and identify as a woman
even more irrelevant
and have a vagina
the only thing that's relevant out of these
liberals believe its a woman i don't think anything have changed from a year ago.
i haven't seen the "she identifies as a woman" argument at all regarding this debate. all i hear was "bbut she has a vagina!", which kinda clears the air about how much value is given to the "identifies as" argument in times of need.
Conservatives on the other hand confuses me.
Many such cases.
 
Back
Top