BLM before it was BLM: Furious Styles RE: Exposed

[Skip Reming]

Back in my day there was a movie called Boyz in da Hood

In it there was a guy named Furious Styles (CBJ's daddy) and the speech he gives would seem right in place with the BLM idiots and Obama.

You will see more and more of this racism from the left and here is me just taking this video to task.



In regards to CBJ getting back from the SATs, FJ says "most of those tests are culturally biased except the math"
- so here we are excusing blacks if they fail half of the SAT. If only white people can answer it then it is back to why are Asians who are from a different culture entirely are so fucking better at it than white. Fuck personal responsiblity for doing shitty on tests. If the outcome is not exactly diverse then it has to be racism. What are these culturally biased questions on the SAT????

In regards to fear their neighborhood will be gentrified
FJ says "they bring the property value down"
- who is they? Well will get back to that.
FJ says "they can buy the land for a lower price, get the people out and sell it for a profit" - so now we are bitching about free enterprise and making nice neighborhoods out of gettos that are doomed?
so who are the THEY's???
FJ has the solution to gentrification and says "we need to keep everything in neighborhood black owned with black money"
- sounds familiar like Ferguson
- racism is definitely the answer. only real racism can fight phantom racism.

Then an old man tells the truth about why getto property values goes down
old man says "it is thugs who bring down the value of the neighborhood with their drugs and guns"

Now, here again we take no personal responsibility, it is all the conspiracy against blacks.

FJ says "blacks don't bring in crack rock in planes"
- so basically blames foreigners for bringing in crack rock in planes for the drug issue in their neighborhoods. Not the neighborhood drug dealers and junkies. And LOL thinking CRACK ROCK is put on a plane from columbia.

FJ says "you see on tv black peolpe selling and pushing rock"
- yeah, on the fucking news and when your shoot up neighborhoods and sell drugs openly on the corner it tends to get on camera more. But oh no it is just a smear job by the media to keep them down.

FJ says "crack was not a problem when it was only in black neighborhoods, only when it went to white neighborhoods and wall st"
- 1st off wall st is coke heaven not crack
- then how does he explain all the leaders of black communities pushing for harsher crack sentences in an attempt to save their neighborhoods??? You know the shit Obama wants to repeal.

FJ says, "that in their neighborhoods there are gun and liquor stores on every corner because THEY want us to kill ourselves"
- um, no as with all busniess you put your products where the customers can purchase them. The getto has so many gun and liquor shops because the locals want to buy them.
- and yes, every business wants dead customers with no purchasing power

FJ says, "the best way to kill a people is to take away their ability to reproduce themselves"
- looks like Hollywood wants to do this by pushing the myth that portraying black couples is being racist

 

[Slippery Kantus]

 

[Devout Pessimist]

Obama speaks as though he watched Boyz in the Hood too many times.

 

[dissolved]

I was grabbing a guilty bite at McDonalds tonight after a long day at work. Of the about-10 rotating news stories on the wall-tv, 2 read as follows:

- Police searching for 3 suspects who made racist slurs to woman at train station

- San Francisco deputy chief of police releases names of officers who exchanged racist texts

On both counts I was like are you kidding me?!

In the first case, since when did the rhyme "sticks and stones . . ." become not only not good advice, but name-calling now warrants a police sting operation/man-hunt?

And in the second case, does it really fit the crime to completely destroy 2 police officers careers and lives (let's face it, they'll have to uproot their families and move, perhaps change their names), all over exposing ill-thought comments to vigilante violence?

The major point that came to me was: how are either of these stories important enough to garner 20% of the news' coverage? Following that thought, was do these stories serve any reasonable purpose except to work up completely irrational anger and even violence to wildly disproportionate/misplaced levels?

What' going on is absolute insanity.

 

[Falsedawn]

I was grabbing a guilty bite at McDonalds tonight after a long day at work. Of the about-10 rotating news stories on the wall, 2 read as follows:

- Police searching for 3 suspects who made racist slurs to woman at train station

- San Francisco deputy chief of police releases names of officers who exchanged racist texts

On both counts I was like are you kidding me?!

In the first case, since when did the rhyme "sticks and stones . . ." become not only not good advice, but name-calling now warrants a police sting operation/man-hunt?

And in the second case, does it really fit the crime to completely destroy 2 police officers careers and lives (let's face it, they'll have to uproot their families and move, perhaps change their names), all over exposing ill-thought comments to vigilante violence?

The major point that came to me was: how are either of these stories important enough to garner 20% of the news' coverage? Following that thought was do these stories serve any reasonable purpose except to work up completely irrational anger and even violence to wildly disproportionate levels?

What' going on is absolute insanity.

The first one, okay I can see it.

The second one, are you totally daft? You don't see a single problem with officers of the law, who are sworn to protect all citizens of this country, showing an overt and frankly disgusting bias toward a certain subset of the people they're supposed to be protecting? You do know why Lady Justice is blindfolded right? You have to be shitting me.

 

[irish_thug]

I was grabbing a guilty bite at McDonalds tonight after a long day at work. Of the about-10 rotating news stories on the wall-tv, 2 read as follows:

- Police searching for 3 suspects who made racist slurs to woman at train station

- San Francisco deputy chief of police releases names of officers who exchanged racist texts

On both counts I was like are you kidding me?!

In the first case, since when did the rhyme "sticks and stones . . ." become not only not good advice, but name-calling now warrants a police sting operation/man-hunt?

And in the second case, does it really fit the crime to completely destroy 2 police officers careers and lives (let's face it, they'll have to uproot their families and move, perhaps change their names), all over exposing ill-thought comments to vigilante violence?

The major point that came to me was: how are either of these stories important enough to garner 20% of the news' coverage? Following that thought, was do these stories serve any reasonable purpose except to work up completely irrational anger and even violence to wildly disproportionate/misplaced levels?

What' going on is absolute insanity.

Are you in Toronto? If so I think the first one also involved the shithead spitting in the face of one of the women.

 

[dissolved]

The first one, okay I can see it.

The second one, are you totally daft? You don't see a single problem with officers of the law, who are sworn to protect all citizens of this country, showing an overt and frankly disgusting bias toward a certain subset of the people they're supposed to be protecting? You do know why Lady Justice is blindfolded right? You have to be shitting me.

You might misunderstand me. One, I don't condone racist speech of any sort. And two, context is huge - just as important to what actually was said. There is so much nuance to private conversation and internal discipline should take place not advertizing to an already angry, ready-for-violent- reaction world. I used to work with some sweet as pie waitresses . . . then, once they got used to me their guards went down and I'd hear them say worse things than any guy I knew - from committing rape, violence and any disgusting thing could think. Point is, they were words and there were various degrees of nuance and meaning to the words (including that they were generally private conversation). Most of what is said (even racist speech) is insincere and even joking (hence why racist joking is a huge part of many black comic's [like Chris Rock] routine).

We don't need to know about every off the cuff remark - not even if they're sincere or not. IF the officers were inciting violence or clearly calling for prejudicial treatment, then sime coverage is warranted. But imo you can't just be throwing out quip stories basically captioned by the present-day worst of words: "racism.". The word has almost lost its meaning and lends to an inordinate amount of vigilantism and social unrest beyond what society can handle (or is warranted). The coverage is creating a larger and larger snowball of which there is no appropriate and realistic end.

 

[dissolved]

Are you in Toronto? If so I think the first one also involved the shithead spitting in the face of one of the women.

I have no idea what the story was/is. It was posted on the news lines just as I put it. If spitting or threats of violence was involved that is different - but those details were missing (if its the same story), which is the point of what I'm saying. There are old ladies that get spit on, homeless people that get pissed on by teens etc. The world can be an awful place. Words alone and the ever-extending definition of "hate speech" is like a never quenched raging fire with endless dry grasslands to gather up.

I'm all for eliminating racist speech.

That said, IMO "racist speech" is one of the most one-sided, irresponsible topics covered in the news today.

 

[glennrod]

"Ooh child, things are gonna get easier"..so classic..