Bitcoin currency of the future?

[kahiljabroni]

Looks like there might be a comeback brewing. The big 3 at coinrape are moving up.

 

[Luminaire]

So tell me, was the holocaust not objectively wrong? Don't worry, I'll wait for your squirmy worm-like answer. Moral relativism is fucking hilarious.

Because a Chicken Sandwich and the Holocaust are equivalent.

DerFraudsbar ladies and gentlemen.

 

[JonesBones]

Bitcoin has actually helped me today. A blockchain company I bought at 5 a share is starting to come back. lol. This was a YOLO bet, I knew it was risky as fuck

 

[xcvbn]

You mean penny stocks. Not real stocks. We have already been over this. Real stocks don't have that volatility.

Maybe this guy shouldve traded "penny stocks" instead of "real stocks"

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/x...rs-of-work-and-other-peoples-money-2018-02-06

Maybe he wouldn't have lost $4,000,000 due to volatility

 

[Turtlejuice]

Lmao. Complete dodge. You gonna answer the question or not worm? Tell us how the holocaust isn't objectively wrong

Funny statement considering your "guarantee that I'd avoid your questions", then you tucked tail and ran away when I answered them and you had no response.

As as they say, the moment someone brings "Hitler" into an argument, is the moment you know they know they've lost it.

 

[Deleted member 409801]

Looks like there might be a comeback brewing. The big 3 at coinrape are moving up.

Been happening every time .

Shed 20% in a day , creep back up 15 ish % in a few days ......shed 20% in a day.


Wash trading would be my guess

 

[Der Eisbär]

Funny statement considering your "guarantee that I'd avoid your questions", then you tucked tail and ran away when I answered them and you had no response.

As as they say, the moment someone brings "Hitler" into an argument, is the moment you know they know they've lost it.

So, you're also going to dodge with your stupid little statement.

Either something is objectively wrong, or it's not. If you're going to state that objective morality doesn't exist, then it's entirely logical that your view is that the holocaust wasn't objectively wrong. If you don't believe the holocaust was objectively wrong, you're either a monster, an idiot, or both.

"The moment you bring Hitler into..." isn't an argument.

Morality is predicated on suffering. If your choices cause suffering, they're objectively wrong. Eating meat causes suffering. Fill in the rest.

 

[xcvbn]

Bitcoin has actually helped me today. A blockchain company I bought at 5 a share is starting to come back. lol. This was a YOLO bet, I knew it was risky as fuck

They own a company that mines coins....hardly "a blockchain company" but you're too big of a hypocritical bitch to know your elbow from your asshole let alone the difference between a mining subsidiary and a company who utilizes blockchain technology.

Enjoy your 10% on 17 shares

 

[xcvbn]

You haven't seen bigger drops, even if you have percentage wise, you have never seen this market lose $450 BILLION in a month, and ultimately that's what matters. A lot of people lost A LOT of money, and many of them weren't lucky enough to be in early like you.

How many trillions were lost when stock exchanges tumbled around the world just this past week?

 

[Turtlejuice]

So, you're also going to dodge with your stupid little statement.

Either something is objectively wrong, or it's not. If you're going to state that objective morality doesn't exist, then it's entirely logical that your view is that the holocaust wasn't objectively wrong. If you don't believe the holocaust was objectively wrong, you're either a monster, an idiot, or both.

"The moment you bring Hitler into..." isn't an argument.

Morality is predicated on suffering. If your choices cause suffering, they're objectively wrong. Eating meat causes suffering. Fill in the rest.

What am I dodging?

Bringing up the holocaust is you admitting defeat. It's not an argument, it's a statement.

Promoting bitcoin causes suffering. Are you trying to admit something here?

 

[HIMBOB]

One of the few comparisons crypto does have with traditional stocks is the sheer amount of money that can slide one way or the other in a relatively short amount of time. Investments are always a risk. Can't time it right every time so you just hope to make the right decisions most of the time.

The 8+ year Nasdaq bull run is pretty insane. Maybe more insane than the recent crypto run when you put things into perspective. 7k->26k DJIA is an enormous amount of capital. Trillions in growth but where is that money actually at? It's as phantom as the value in some of these scam cryptocurrencies imo. It's more phony than Dogecoin.

I wouldn't say it's phonier but it is all based on unsustainably low interest rates which will have to be unwound.

Thing is if the predicted unwinding can unsettle markets like this a real and material increase in rates could cause havok. Worse still there is no real room to drop them.

 

[Der Eisbär]

What am I dodging?

Bringing up the holocaust is you admitting defeat. It's not an argument, it's a statement.

Promoting bitcoin causes suffering. Are you trying to admit something here?

"Bringing up the holocaust is you admitting defeat" isn't an argument, and isn't logical in the slightest. Your pathetic attempts to dodge the question is you actually admitting defeat.

It doesn't have to be the holocaust. There are numerous other examples of suffering on a mass scale.

Were the communist gulags of Soviet russia not objectively wrong? I can keep doing this with more and more examples. But by all means keep up your pathetic attempts to dodge the question because the logical answer forces you to reevaluate your sad views on morality.

The block chain is going to make life better for all mankind. So no, it's not promoting suffering, quite the opposite.

 

[JonesBones]

They own a company that mines coins....hardly "a blockchain company" but you're too big of a hypocritical bitch to know your elbow from your asshole let alone the difference between a mining subsidiary and a company who utilizes blockchain technology.

Enjoy your 10% on 17 shares

lol at the crybaby pedantry. Go on and tell me how crypto go up and down like stocks. That is the only kind of stock that does. Penny ones like that.

Enjoy your 50% + loss recently.

 

[JonesBones]

"Bringing up the holocaust is you admitting defeat" isn't an argument, and isn't logical in the slightest. Your pathetic attempts to dodge the question is you actually admitting defeat.

It doesn't have to be the holocaust. There are numerous other examples of suffering on a mass scale.

Were the communist gulags of Soviet russia not objectively wrong? I can keep doing this with more and more examples. But by all means keep up your pathetic attempts to dodge the question because the logical answer forces you to reevaluate your sad views on morality.

The block chain is going to make life better for all mankind. So no, it's not promoting suffering, quite the opposite.

No, nothing is objectively morally wrong. How could it be? By what standard? You can have personal ethics and still come to the rational conclusion that it is still just an opinion. Not a law of the universe.

I brought this up about the stupid fiat argument. You say fiat like it is a bad thing. Laws are fiat. Society is fiat. There is nothing inherent about it.

 

[xcvbn]

lol at the crybaby pedantry. Go on and tell me how crypto go up and down like stocks.

Enjoy your 50% + loss recently.

LMAO

Dude I'm literally still up 256,000% you're not gonna hurt my feelings.

 

[Luminaire]

How many trillions were lost when stock exchanges tumbled around the world just this past week?

Well at that point you're forced to include scale. The DOW dropped almost 10% over a few days, pretty nasty to be honest.

However, not comparable to the 65% drop that Bitcoin experienced in the last month.

If the DOW loses 65% and ends up at $9000 next month, then I guess we will have an apt comparison.

 

[JonesBones]

LMAO

Dude I'm literally still up 256,000% you're not gonna hurt my feelings.

You aren't up nothing till you cash out. You're still a mark for holding. Why not sell when it was more than double the price genius? lol

 

[Der Eisbär]

No, nothing is objectively morally wrong. How could it be? By what standard? You can have personal ethics and still come to the rational conclusion that it is still just an opinion. Not a law of the universe.

I brought this up about the stupid fiat argument. You say fiat like it is a bad thing. Laws are fiat. Society is fiat. There is nothing inherent about it.

So the holocaust is not objectively wrong. Gotcha bud.

By what measure you ask? The measure of suffering.

 

[Luminaire]

LMAO

Dude I'm literally still up 256,000% you're not gonna hurt my feelings.

You're up 256,000%?

What are you doing here lol... what did you do, invest a fucking penny?

A measly $10 would net you 2.56 million at that return.

I'm calling bullshit lmao.

 

[JonesBones]

So the holocaust is not objectively wrong. Gotcha bud.

By what measure you ask? The measure of suffering.

There is no evidence that a moral system should be based on suffering. That is an opinion. That is a lazy Sam Harris argument. Old as time. Utilitarianism garbage. Suffering is not always bad.