Bisping being the champ is proof that the MW division hasn't improved

JWittobeast

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
662
Reaction score
0
Stop saying "Oh Anderson would get his ass kicked even in his prime now"

Bisping is the champ ATM.
That might change soon, but whatever, point is is that Bisping is the champ.
Bisping, the same guy who never got a Anderson Silva title shot in his prime because he was too busy stacking up losses to the guys that were (Belfort, Henderson, Sonnen).

So yah, the MW division hasn't improved at all.
Shut up...please shertards no more
 
Rockhold beats him 99/100 times. I honestly don't think history will treat him as a legit champ like they will Franklin/Anderson/Weidman
 
No it's proof that you can't underestimate a guy even if he is way below your skill level, because it's still a fight, and he will fuck you up.
 
So ol' one eye is the champ, its not as bad as heavy weight where they're all on the verge of geriatrics.
 
No it's proof that you can't underestimate a guy even if he is way below your skill level, because it's still a fight, and he will fuck you up.

Yup, just more Rockhold excusers.
Don't care, Rockhold stiffened up like a dead cat. If the MW division improved, Bisping should have been retired if he was losing back to back when the division was "worse" but now he's the champ.
 
Rockhold beats him 99/100 times. I honestly don't think history will treat him as a legit champ like they will Franklin/Anderson/Weidman
The planets definetly aligned for that one
 
Rockhold beats him 99/100 times. I honestly don't think history will treat him as a legit champ like they will Franklin/Anderson/Weidman

"Rockhold beats him 99/100 times except for that one time when he didn't lol"

You're the kind of guy to say that Rory deserves another title shot because "He was almost winning, he wins 99999999999/100 times"
 
Rockhold beats him 99/100 times. I honestly don't think history will treat him as a legit champ like they will Franklin/Anderson/Weidman
How can you say he isn't a legit champ when he took the belt in dominating fashion? That's pure ignorance.
 
Yup, just more Rockhold excusers.

It's not an excuse, it's a fact to anyone who knows what they are looking at.

And it doesn't make Rockhold look good anyway, to say he basically threw his belt away by acting like he was above being punched in the face.
 
How can you say he isn't a legit champ when he took the belt in dominating fashion? That's pure ignorance.

Because flukes happen in MMA. There is no such thing as a lucky punch, but there are lucky outcomes.

No one thinks Serra as a legit WW champ. We all knew it was a fluke.
 
"Rockhold beats him 99/100 times except for that one time when he didn't lol"

You're the kind of guy to say that Rory deserves another title shot because "He was almost winning, he wins 99999999999/100 times"

If Rory had survived the 5th he would have been champ, he was minutes away. Are you really convinced that Robbie is better than Rory?

Were you also convinced JDS was better than Cain after their first fight?

(hint: he wasn't.)
 
It's not an excuse, it's a fact to anyone who knows what they are looking at.

And it doesn't make Rockhold look good anyway, to say he basically threw his belt away by acting like he was above being punched in the face.

Saying someone underestimated someone isn't a good thing, it makes them look horrible. You're insulting the guy you're trying to defend.
It's like the guys who talk about Cain and his failure to train for his fight with Werdum, that's his fault and no one else's.
I'm not making excuses for anyone for "underestimating" someone, because

1. You never know that for sure
2. It doesn't mean anything.
 
Stop saying "Oh Anderson would get his ass kicked even in his prime now"

Bisping is the champ ATM.
That might change soon, but whatever, point is is that Bisping is the champ.
Bisping, the same guy who never got a Anderson Silva title shot in his prime because he was too busy stacking up losses to the guys that were (Belfort, Henderson, Sonnen).

So yah, the MW division hasn't improved at all.
Shut up...please shertards no more

Note that everyone you listed who Bisping lost to in title shot eliminators (Vitor, Hendo, Shael) were on PEDs pre-USADA. So was Anderoid for that matter lol

There's also the fact that most of if not all of the current top MW contenders (Weidman, Rockhold, Jacare, Romero) are matchup nightmares for Andy
 
Bisping beating Rockhold was a Serra/GSP moment and he'll get dominated in the trilogy. That fight is proof of nothing except Rockhold having had no respect for Bisping as a fighter. The division has unquestionably improved though and even Bisping has improved. And that doesn't discredit Anderson in any way. WW has improved since GSP left. HW has improved (at the top 5 level at least) since Fedor left. The top LHW's today are absolutely better than Chuck/Wand, etc. That's just the nature of a young, evolving sport. No need to take it personally and act like it discredits previous greats.
 
Bisping being champ is proof the MMA gods are real, and created this unlikely scenario where Dan Henderson will retire as champion. Then all will be right with the world, and the division.

A very exciting tournament for the title could take place after that, stretching most of the year.

And yes the skill level of the MW has vastly improved. It's very easy to see that.
 
If Rory had survived the 5th he would have been champ, he was minutes away. Are you really convinced that Robbie is better than Rory?

Were you also convinced JDS was better than Cain after their first fight?

(hint: he wasn't.)


Rory had 2 fights with Robbie

2-0 = 0 is somehow better

You're literally a trope, lol
 
Because flukes happen in MMA. There is no such thing as a lucky punch, but there are lucky outcomes.

No one thinks Serra as a legit WW champ. We all knew it was a fluke.
Well, apparently Bisping wiped the floor with him sparring years ago, which Luke himself has never denied, so who's to say that the fight rockhold won wasn't the fluke win in this rivalry?
 
Rory had 2 fights with Robbie

2-0 = 0 is somehow better

You're literally a trope, lol

Rory was a -380 favourite the first fight and was ALSO the favorite in the second fight at -200.

You're an idiot. The people who actually know how to pick fights disagree with your clueless way of thinking. DERP 0-2 DERP.

you'd also pick Nick Diaz to beat Robbie also? Because he's 1-0 against him? LeL.
 
Well, apparently Bisping wiped the floor with him sparring years ago, which Luke himself has never denied, so who's to say that the fight rockhold won wasn't the fluke win in this rivalry?


Because Rockhold already finished him the first time they fought.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,510
Messages
56,651,491
Members
175,334
Latest member
dubhlinn
Back
Top