- Joined
- Nov 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,828
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes we all have heard how the 1994 crime bill signed by clinton was some systematic racism aimed at locking up black people.
Yes, you read how I showed that it was the black leadership who wanted harsher jail terms for crack vs cocaine to help clean up THEIR neighborhoods.
Now, with BLM (which should be CBLM <-- the "c" standing for criminal) what was intended and actually DID help the black community is seen as racism.
BLM history is it was started on a lie. It has been proven that Michael brown was not shot in the back or from a distance and did not have his hands up. He was shot from the front at close range, close enough to grab at the officers gun ,and was not saying "don't shoot" either.
But they wanted to hang the officer without a trial. They rioted and ruined a mostly black town of ferguson and were allowed to by the popo.
We have seen BLM get university presidents ousted on ridiculous racist terms at Mizzou that are just fucking nonsense.
So, all this is getting to that BLM only gives a fuck about black criminals. Most black people are not criminals. BLM does not give a fuck about innocent lives.
So when Obama lets out the crack dealers and reduces sentences for drug dealing and non violent crimes like STEALING and all the other things he wants to do to gut this crime bill, who is going to be the victims?
Oh, the victims are the families of the criminals who lose all the drug money their loved one got incarcerated for...
But hey, instead of the criminals and their families being the victims, let's make the whole black community victims. That is not racist.
The KKK would want black criminals to remain at large. They don't want to float the bill for them in jail. Just let them out to commit all the crimes they want because STATISTICALLY, blacks are more likely to commit crime against other blacks.
White people are more likely to commit crimes against white people. Black people are more likely to commit crimes against black people.
These are facts, so if we free more black criminals guess who is going to be the victim of more crime? Black people.
Yes, blacks are over represented in prison population....but guess what else? Blacks are over represented as victims in crime as well. Funny how the liberal media or BLM never brings this up???
Here is a nice little infographic on what would have happened if crime rates would have stayed in the same direction they were going before the bill was signed.
conclusion: the crime act of 1994 is not racist and neither are all the laws on the books. Letting black criminal out of jail earlier is not going to help the black community, but destroy it more.
Many in BLM are millennials and have no idea of what their communities looked like back in the 1980s crack hey day. All they know is the relative low crime level they enjoy thanks in part to the crime bill they are trying to destroy.
#CBLM4LIFE
Yes, you read how I showed that it was the black leadership who wanted harsher jail terms for crack vs cocaine to help clean up THEIR neighborhoods.
Now, with BLM (which should be CBLM <-- the "c" standing for criminal) what was intended and actually DID help the black community is seen as racism.
BLM history is it was started on a lie. It has been proven that Michael brown was not shot in the back or from a distance and did not have his hands up. He was shot from the front at close range, close enough to grab at the officers gun ,and was not saying "don't shoot" either.
But they wanted to hang the officer without a trial. They rioted and ruined a mostly black town of ferguson and were allowed to by the popo.
We have seen BLM get university presidents ousted on ridiculous racist terms at Mizzou that are just fucking nonsense.
So, all this is getting to that BLM only gives a fuck about black criminals. Most black people are not criminals. BLM does not give a fuck about innocent lives.
So when Obama lets out the crack dealers and reduces sentences for drug dealing and non violent crimes like STEALING and all the other things he wants to do to gut this crime bill, who is going to be the victims?
Oh, the victims are the families of the criminals who lose all the drug money their loved one got incarcerated for...
But hey, instead of the criminals and their families being the victims, let's make the whole black community victims. That is not racist.
The KKK would want black criminals to remain at large. They don't want to float the bill for them in jail. Just let them out to commit all the crimes they want because STATISTICALLY, blacks are more likely to commit crime against other blacks.
White people are more likely to commit crimes against white people. Black people are more likely to commit crimes against black people.
These are facts, so if we free more black criminals guess who is going to be the victim of more crime? Black people.
Yes, blacks are over represented in prison population....but guess what else? Blacks are over represented as victims in crime as well. Funny how the liberal media or BLM never brings this up???
Here is a nice little infographic on what would have happened if crime rates would have stayed in the same direction they were going before the bill was signed.
conclusion: the crime act of 1994 is not racist and neither are all the laws on the books. Letting black criminal out of jail earlier is not going to help the black community, but destroy it more.
Many in BLM are millennials and have no idea of what their communities looked like back in the 1980s crack hey day. All they know is the relative low crime level they enjoy thanks in part to the crime bill they are trying to destroy.
#CBLM4LIFE
