Media Biased commentary by Rogan and DC

[do a moniker]

DC used to be decent. Brought on as an ex fighter as a gimmick. Now he takes himself way too seriously and is beyond biased.

The two of them pick who they think is looking better/they want to win, and use that as their baseline. The rest of the fight is either confirmatory, or the other opponent has to do a lot to change the tide. That is, they over glorify every thing their guy does, and minimize or ignore the opponent. It’s the old adage you have to beat the champ to be the champ. This was not a great showing by them, but not nearly as bad as Jan vs Izzy. That was borderline criminal

 

[FlowchartRog]

I knew how insanely biased they were when they acted like Dustin was almost decapitated by barely landed shots, then when the turning point came 90 seconds in, and Poirier blasted him with those 4 shots that made him panic wrestle, they could only muster a meek "Oh, oh". They sounded so disappointed <Lmaoo>

 

[D'z]

I firmly believe Joe Buck only has his job because of his last name and the fact he has a good voice. I don't watch much of the sports he covers, but on NFL broadcasts, he's awful. As I commented to my buddies years ago, he's hard to understand because he can never get Aikman's cock out of his mouth long enough to speak clearly.

As an Eagles fan, I know exactly what you mean.

 

[kuka45]

They can be biased as much as they want, they are paid by UFC, and they do what they're asked for. UFC should be targetted by commentary being biased.

 

[Peli]

<{cruzshake}>

but dustin admitted that hit did sting him.