Benghazi Report Concluded aaaannnddd??

I

InvestigatorIL

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
0
Why hasn't any Republican member of these forums made this thread yet?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/28/politics/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton/

Anyway, the 2 year partisan investigation concluded today states that security lapses lead to the incident but place no further blame on Hillary Clinton.

"The House Benghazi Committee report doesn't directly blame Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time and is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, for the attacks. But it does suggest she and other administration officials did not adequately address the risks involved. It also found Stevens himself bore responsibility for securing his post."

So how many republicans are willing to admit they were wrong and this was a huge waste of taxpayer money?
 
So it wasn't just her fault, but hers as well as others? And she's absolved? Lol
 
InvestigatorIL said:
Why hasn't any Republican member of these forums made this thread yet?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/28/politics/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton/

Anyway, the 2 year partisan investigation concluded today states that security lapses lead to the incident but place no further blame on Hillary Clinton.

"The House Benghazi Committee report doesn't directly blame Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time and is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, for the attacks. But it does suggest she and other administration officials did not adequately address the risks involved. It also found Stevens himself bore responsibility for securing his post."

So how many republicans are willing to admit they were wrong and this was a huge waste of taxpayer money?
Click to expand...


http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/gop-release-benghazi-report.3276137/#post-118222981
 
InvestigatorIL said:
Why hasn't any Republican member of these forums made this thread yet?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/28/politics/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton/

Anyway, the 2 year partisan investigation concluded today states that security lapses lead to the incident but place no further blame on Hillary Clinton.

"The House Benghazi Committee report doesn't directly blame Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time and is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, for the attacks. But it does suggest she and other administration officials did not adequately address the risks involved. It also found Stevens himself bore responsibility for securing his post."

So how many republicans are willing to admit they were wrong and this was a huge waste of taxpayer money?
Click to expand...
How is she not responsible? The ambassador had been asking for an increase in security for weeks before his death and Clinton never provided it. Nobody was even in route to help them once the attack was occurring, no NATO aircraft....Nobody.

Clinton is the waste of time.
 
I don't know what she did or didn't do, but what I do know is that if she was guilty of something, they would never let that come out anyway. She is bought and paid for, and is an investment that needs to be free.

So in a way TS is right. It was a complete waste of time and money.
 
The live press conference was weird. A member would get up and say Hillary is morally reprehensible and then Gowdy would say the report does not state that. He kept saying read the 800 page report and make your own mind up.
 
InvestigatorIL said:
Why hasn't any Republican member of these forums made this thread yet?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/28/politics/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton/

Anyway, the 2 year partisan investigation concluded today states that security lapses lead to the incident but place no further blame on Hillary Clinton.

"The House Benghazi Committee report doesn't directly blame Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time and is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, for the attacks. But it does suggest she and other administration officials did not adequately address the risks involved. It also found Stevens himself bore responsibility for securing his post."

So how many republicans are willing to admit they were wrong and this was a huge waste of taxpayer money?
Click to expand...

Oh gee sorry, I guess I was mislead by a liar:

"I take responsibility for what happened in Benghazi" -- Hillary Clinton

""I take responsibility, I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts." -- Hillary Clinton

Sometimes it seems like all you Hillary supporters do is trip on your dicks. I look forward to all the times you defend her. It's funny, for example, you could start a thread like this and completely ignore the finding that Hillary didn't do anything to protect the people in her charge and that she lied about it afterward.

Lied. A lot.

And why did she lie? Because she did the right thing? You have to think things like this through.



 
InvestigatorIL said:
Why hasn't any Republican member of these forums made this thread yet?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/28/politics/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton/

Anyway, the 2 year partisan investigation concluded today states that security lapses lead to the incident but place no further blame on Hillary Clinton.

"The House Benghazi Committee report doesn't directly blame Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time and is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, for the attacks. But it does suggest she and other administration officials did not adequately address the risks involved. It also found Stevens himself bore responsibility for securing his post."

So how many republicans are willing to admit they were wrong and this was a huge waste of taxpayer money?
Click to expand...
CNN?
 
Let's imagine you're the "Regional Director" of prisons in a state. You are the boss of the Wardens, each of which oversees a prison.

One of your Wardens is repeatedly sending you messages.. "X Prison is a powder keg, we need additional security. Now. Send help. Situation can not be controlled."

You ignore those messages. Instead, your department sends a memo that your officers must not use live ammunition in their weapons, in order to prevent unnecessary bloodshed/PR problems.

Prison riot ensues, 4 officers are killed, brutally.


Who is responsible for the deaths of those 4 officers? The Warden who begged for help? The officers themselves? Or the head of the department who refused to send help AND disarmed the officers that were present?



Fuck you Hillary Clinton, I wish there was a hell for you to go to.
 
So it's correct that Hilary (and others) were perpetuating the Youtube story when they believed something else to be the truth?
 
The timeline shows that Hilary was instructing her people to find offensive media to blame the terrorist attack on while the attack was still happening while she never lifted a finger to send support or help.

She had intel that it was a well coordinated and planned attack from day 1, but she instead pushed a narrative that a youtube video caused the attack. She is a monster and a liar.
 
CNN - Clinton News Network

The Democrat media narriative is that this report is old news and Hillary is blameless for Benghazi.

When the summary of the report details she is one of the four most responsible, and it's being intentionally misreported months before an election so the White House stays under Democrat control.

Its like 2012 all over again.
 
Once again
giphy.gif
 
Corporate america is not going to let their baby get smeared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,400
Messages
56,645,172
Members
175,331
Latest member
psykro

Share this page

Back
Top