BATMAN V SUPERMAN v.11 ($170 Million Opening Weekend; Dragonlord's Review)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dragonlordxxxxx

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Senior Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
85,578
Reaction score
20,881
Update: March 25, 2016

Dragonlord's Review of BATMAN V SUPERMAN
(Spoilers)

Batman-v-Superman-Banner-032616-Dragonlord.jpg


After decades of unsuccessful attempts to bring these characters together on the silver screen, two of the most iconic fictional characters finally face off in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Unfortunately, Warner Bros.’ agenda to catch up with the competition impairs what could have been an epic movie by suffusing it with incongruous scenes clearly meant as a set-up for the Justice League movie.

BvS starts off on a wrong note with a credits intro of the funeral and murder of Bruce Wayne’s parents. There’s nothing groundbreaking or anything new to see here. The only thing I liked was how they staged the mugger’s gun snapping Martha Wayne’s pearl necklace (a la Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns). We also have a déjà vu scene of young Bruce stumbling into the Batcave and then being swarmed by a colony of bats. Then young Bruce enchantingly floats among the bats. WTF?? Thankfully, that part was just a dream because it was corny as hell.

So why did director Zack Snyder decide to go with this intro? I suspect it’s his artsy way of saying that the movie started with a funeral and ended in a funeral. (In fairness, it could be the screenwriters’ fault also) Then we switch to what SHOULD have been the main intro with a much older Bruce Wayne frantically driving to the Wayne building in Metropolis in the middle of Superman’s battle with General Zod in Man of Steel. It’s an exciting scene and gives me hope for what’s to come next. (But it’s laughable how the Wayne employees only started to evacuate the building AFTER Bruce Wayne told them to)

Batman-v-Superman-Bruce-Wayne-Metropolis-Attack-Dragonlord.jpg


That hope I was talking about gradually eroded as the first half of the movie passed by. Scenes were poorly edited which resulted in an uneven pacing. The narration didn’t flow organically. Felt like they shot two separate movies and stitched them together haphazardly.

The extended “Knightmare” dream/future vision sequence including the surprise appearance by a DC character was unnecessary and dissonant with the rest of the film. It’s like Christian Bale’s John Connor appearing briefly to Sarah Connor at the motel in the first Terminator movie warning her about the events of Terminator 3. It’s just jarring and needless at this point. The striking image of Bruce Wayne looking up from the rubble of the Wayne building at the beginning of the film asserts the character’s motivation and speaks more volumes than all the nightmare scenes.

There are a few perplexing moments like why would Superman be blamed for the death of the terrorists and civilians in Africa when it’s clear that they were killed by guns. Or why did Superman not bother to stop the truck that Batman was chasing.

Batman-v-Superman-032616a-Dragonlord.jpg


As for the much-anticipated fight between Batman and Superman, it was glorious and awesomely staged when viewing it without context. You just have to turn off your brain a little to ignore how Superman could have ended the fight quickly in a number of different ways or how he could just have blurted hastily on multiple occasions, “BruceMyMomIsKidnappedByLexLuthorINeedYourHelpPlease.”

But if you add the circumstances that led to the BvS fight, they goofed up. What made the fights between the two characters in The Dark Knight Returns or Hush a classic was that Batman was the underdog and the clear protagonist that had the moral authority between the two. Batman, a mere human, going up against a god; it’s a classic David vs. Goliath underdog story. But in the BvS fight, it is Superman who is in the right and Batman who is the asshole whose motives you understand but don’t really side with. So the audience ends up being conflicted when they should be fully rooting for “the little man” (Bats) to win against overwhelming odds. Adding a red Kryptonite element to the story would have solved some of these problems.

After Batman conveniently (magically even) admits to being wrong about Superman, the two agree to work together to save the day. With the murkiness of their motivations cleared up and the audience wholeheartedly rooting for both characters, Batman v Superman starts being enjoyable and finally feels like a Goddamn superhero movie. After 90 joyless, gloomy minutes, the movie starts being fun. The Doomsday plot could have been built up better but didn’t care as the movie was now firing on all cylinders. Clearly shoehorned but it didn’t matter, Wonder Woman’s appearance at the final battle just added more fun to the mix.

Batman-v-Superman-Robin-Costume-032616b-Dragonlord.jpg


Most of Sherdog and the rest of the world were wrong with two out of the three most controversial casting from the movie – Ben Affleck as Bruce Wayne/Batman and Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman.

Affleck was fantastic in the role and aesthetically speaking is the best Bruce Wayne among the entire movie incarnations (not Jon Hamm perfect but close). As I said many times before, it’s much harder to pull off Bruce Wayne than Batman, where stunt-doubles and editing can make anyone in that cape look good. But still, Snyder’s version wins for having the best Batman movie fight scenes yet. Christopher Nolan might have snuck on the set and secretly directed the “Knightmare” Batman fight scene which was embarrassing to watch.

Gadot was sexy and a nice, fun reprieve from the downer vibe of the movie. Her action scenes, as well as her theme music that accompanied her debut, were bad-ass. And even though the Justice League member cameos felt tacked-on, I couldn’t help but get excited seeing them (again thanks to Wonder Woman’s riveting score playing in the background).

Batman-v-Superman-Lex-Luthor-Mercy-Graves-Dragonlord.jpg


The third controversial casting was Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. It’s kind of a mixed bag for me. Under normal circumstances, Luthor’s Joker-like personality is annoying and off-putting. But under the film’s overall glum tone where characters are even afraid to crack a smile, his manic energy is at times welcomed as he seems to be the only character having fun. One thing is for sure though, I’m glad this Luthor’s master plan doesn’t revolve around a freakin’ real estate scheme.

Henry Cavill will get a lot of flak for his somber, uncharismatic performance but it’s not his fault since he is given so little to work with from the dour script. Also, the script is too ambitious for its own good, presenting different political, social and religious undertones while juggling to be a commercial blockbuster film as well as setting up the Justice League movie. Between the two main characters, I was drawn more to the Superman side of the story in BvS. If they stuck to the original plan of Man of Steel 2, before Warner Bros. decided to insert Batman and Wonder Woman in there, I think the story would have worked much better. Even in BvS, you can still see the framework of the Man of Steel 2 script before the addendums.

Batman-v-Superman-Lois-Saved-Dragonlord.jpg


Just like in Man of Steel, Lois Lane has a tiresome habit of being in several major scenes with some of them being superfluous, like dropping the Kryptonite spear in the water and then picking it up later. Other than that, Amy Adams was solid. Her bathtub scene is probably one of the most titillating non-R rated scenes in comic book history.

Despite the great action and several gorgeous, picturesque imagery in BvS, Snyder might be the wrong director for the Justice League movie. His extreme doom and gloom tone might not be a good fit which I suspect some moviegoers have begun to get tired of. BvS also proves that the DC Extended Universe needs a Kevin Feige counterpart (maybe Paul Dini or Bruce Timm) to guide the DCEU and to rein in filmmakers’ questionable decisions.

Overall, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice succumbed to the burden of juggling too much on its plate. The first half of the movie lacked cohesion and was poorly edited/paced. The actual Batman-Superman fight was very well-done but could have been so much better (see paragraph 7). It’s not until the two main characters start working together that the film truly comes alive.

Preliminary Rating: 6/10







Link to previous Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice threads:

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
 
Update: March 27, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Smashes Records with $170.1M U.S. Debut and $424.1M Globally


Batman-v-Superman-Blocked-Punch-Dragonlord.jpg


In a much-needed win for Warner Bros., Zack Snyder's Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice opened to a massive $170.1 million from 4,242 theaters, a defining moment in DC Entertainment's battle to compete with Marvel's superhero universe. It also helped deliver the biggest Easter weekend in history, up 13.5 percent over last year's record level, fueled by Furious 7.

Snyder's film scored the No. 6 opening of all time at the North American box office, and the fourth-best of all time for a superhero film behind a trio of Marvel titles: The Avengers ($207.4 million), Avengers: Age of Ultron ($191.3 million) and Iron-Man 3 ($174.1 million), not accounting for inflation.

BvS also made history globally, scoring the biggest superhero opening of all time with $424.1 million, including $254 million internationally. The movie benefited from opening day and date in China, where it amassed a $57.3 million.

If the $170.1 million estimate holds, it will also be the biggest start ever for Warners, edging out the final Harry Potter film ($169.2 million). Batman v Superman's mega-performance is all the more impressive considering it earned dismal notices and a mediocre B CinemaScore.

The previous best domestic opening for a DC Entertainment film was Christopher Nolan's final Batman films, The Dark Knight Rises, which debuted to $160.9 million in summer 2012.

Box Office: 'Batman v. Superman' Launches DC Superhero Universe With Record $170.1M U.S. Debut
 
Critics' Reviews for BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE

Rotten Tomatoes: 29% Approval Rating (68 out of 232 critics like it)

Critics Consensus: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice smothers a potentially powerful story -- and some of America's most iconic superheroes -- in a grim whirlwind of effects-driven action.

batman-v-superman-justice-league-slice.jpg


Entertainment Weekly - Dawn of Justice starts off as an intriguing meditation about two superheroes turning to an all-too-human emotion: hatred out of fear of the unknown. Two and a half hours later it winds up somewhere very far from that—but at the same time, all too familiar. It's another numbing smash-and-bash orgy of CGI mayhem with an ending that leaves the door open wide enough to justify the next 10 installments. Is it too late to demand a rematch? C+

The Hollywood Reporter - The film may be imposing, but it's not fun. Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor, is so intensely annoying that, very early on, you wish Batman and Superman would just patch up their differences and join forces to put the squirrely rascal out of his, and our, misery. [Rotten]

Empire Magazine - There are moments that make the whole enterprise worthwhile, and introduces an intriguing new Batman. But it’s also cluttered and narratively wonky; a few jokes wouldn’t have gone amiss, either. A climax to a climax, it’s CGI overkill, making for a generic and exhausting denouement. 3/5

Miami Herald - In Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, the Dark Knight and the Man of Steel duke it out and the audience loses. This huge, unwieldy movie is busy and overcrowded. Almost every aspect of the film — from the shoehorning of Wonder Woman, into the plot to pointless cameos by several other fan-favorite DC characters — feels like it was decided in a boardroom instead of a writers’ pen. 2/4

IGN Movies - While Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has good things to recommend it, it’s shortcomings are undeniable. The action sequences whenever Batman is set loose on the bad guys are cool, and the story strives to explore human and philosophical elements, but it’s often not much fun. Even the melodramatic X-Men movies never lost sight of pure entertainment value while also exploring heady and heavy topics. 6.8/10

USA Today - BvS will please those either waiting for the two main players to lock horns on a movie screen, or those who've just been pining for Wonder Woman forever. And for the nerdier crowds, a fleeting glimpse at other superheroes hints this is the Dawn of something potentially sensational. 3/4

Uproxx - Honestly, I can’t remember the last time I was legitimately looking this forward to a movie that I found this dull. I am gobsmacked by just how dull this movie turned out to be. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice so desperately wants to be dark and gritty, it forgets to have any fun. 4/10

Forbes - Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is not a good movie. It offers a truly unengaging Batman and then allows that character to dominate the proceedings while providing a painfully mopey and grim Superman-and-Friends narrative where the only ray of light comes from its homicidal arch-villain. The action scenes get better as they go along, but they aren’t as clean as comprehensible as Man of Steel’s daylight smack downs. 5/10

Daily Telegraph - No major blockbuster in years has been this incoherently structured, this seemingly uninterested in telling a story with clarity and purpose. It grumbles along for what feels like forever, jinking from subplot to subplot, until two shatteringly expensive-looking fights happen back to back, and the whole thing crunches to a halt. 2/5

Newsday - Overlong, underdeveloped and almost entirely humorless, “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” may please die-hard fans by pitting two DC icons against each other. Everyone else may want to wait for the next Marvel movie. 1.5/4

Rolling Stone - Snyder, juiced up by Hans Zimmer's caffeinated score, throws everything at the screen until resistance is futile. Better than Man of Steel but below the high bar set by Nolan's Dark Knight, Dawn of Justice is still a colossus, the stuff that DC Comics dreams are made of for that kid in all of us who yearns to see Batman and Superman suit up and go in for the kill. 3/4

James Berardinelli - For those who thought Man of Steel was dark, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Batman v Superman, the battle royale/team-up of DC Comics’ revered superheroes, is so bleak that the sun never seems to shine, the characters’ faces can’t form smiles, and the whole affair is more depressing than fun. 2.5/4
 
Update: March 3, 2016

Jena Malone's Scene Cut from BATMAN V SUPERMAN Theatrical Release


Jena-Malone-Batman-v-Superman-030316-Dragonlord.jpg


If Batman v Superman sounds crowded, it actually got smaller as time went on. The PG-13 movie’s 2 hour 31 minute runtime will expand further with an R-rated “Ultimate Edition” on home video, featuring even more brutal fight scenes as well as additional hints at future films. There’ll also be some new characters, including a secret one played by Jena Malone, who was cut from the theatrical release.

The shared universe took so long to coordinate not just because of business machinations, but because the DC movie braintrust had to make sure that each character felt distinct and strong. Nobody wants their favorite comic book hero to become somebody else’s sidekick. And Warner Bros. executives learned from 2011’s Green Lantern that getting it wrong can set their movie plans back for many years.

[Update: "I think we should keep it private, but it’s nothing that’s been talked about,” Snyder tells EW. “She’s definitely not Robin or Batgirl. I’m happy to say that.”]

Jena Malone's Mystery Character from Batman v Superman Cut from Theatrical Release
____________________________________





Update: March 3, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Tracking for $140 Million Opening Weekend

7238649_batman-v-superman-tv-spot-shines-a-spotlight_t5e987e7d.png


On Thursday, Batman v Superman debuted on tracking to huge numbers, suggesting an opening of $140 million over the March 25-27 weekend in North America, if not more, according to those with access to prerelease surveys. Warner Bros. insiders are being more cautious in suggesting a range of $110 million on the lower end.

Either way, the tentpole — introducing Ben Affleck as the newest Batman and featuring Henry Cavill in his second turn as Superman — should rank among the top 10 openings of all time for a comic book adaptation.

The big question is whether Dawn of Justice, costing at least $250 million to make, can open on par with or ahead of the R-rated Deadpool, which stunned Hollywood when launching last month to $132.4 million over the three-day Presidents Day weekend. (Deadpool's four-day haul was $152.2 million.)

One big difference: Dawn of Justice, which sports a friendlier PG-13 rating, runs two hours and 31 minutes, meaning fewer show times. Deadpool's running time is one hour and 48 minutes.

In terms of March openings, The Hunger Games holds the record, with $152.5 million.

'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice' Could Soar to $140 Million Debut
____________________________________





Update: February 23, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN to Get R-Rated Ultimate Edition Blu-Ray Release


Batman-v-Superman-Empire-020116-Dragonlord.jpg


Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice is set to get an R-rated "Ultimate Edition" release on Blu-ray, according to the Classifications and Ratings Administration.

Titled Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition, the expanded cut is likely to be similar in scope to Batman V Superman director Zack Snyder's Ultimate Cut of Watchmen.

It's reportedly rated R only for "scenes of violence," so it's unlikely this is a byproduct of Deadpool's massive success and the spate of R-rated comic book movies now rumored to be in development.

Batman V. Superman To Get R-Rated Ultimate Edition Blu-Ray Release
 
Update: February 22, 2016

JUSTICE LEAGUE - PART 1 Begins Filming April 2016; Shooting Location Revealed


Justice-League-52-Dragonlord-1.jpg


Zack Snyder’s Justice LeaguePart 1 is officially a go at Warner Bros. and will begin filming on April 11, a little over two weeks after the release of Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, the director and studio tell EW.

“The idea that we could begin to boot up a Justice League concept was a cool thing,” says Snyder, who also directed 2013’s Man of Steel and has become one of the key figures in shaping DC’s connected film universe.

“It was a little bit of an ‘about time’ moment, and I don’t blame [the studio] for feeling that way, because it’s a long time coming,” he said. “But I do feel like it’s a little bit of a creative hurdle. It seems like an easy thing to do at first glance, the idea that, ‘Oh, we just get the rest of the superheroes in there.’ But you have to [establish] a world where they can exist.”

Justice League, which will be released on Nov. 17, 2017, will shoot at the Warner Bros. Leavesden studios in southeast England, as well as various locations around London and in Iceland. While this film is being designated Part 1, the follow-up installment, which will shoot separately, is already on the studio’s release schedule for 2019.

While three years passed between the release Man of Steel and Batman v. Superman, that was mainly because the various creative teams were mapping out so many interlocked stories. “The studio really wants us to try and pace it up, as far as —now we have an idea where we’re going,” Snyder says.

Justice League - Part 1 Starts Shooting This April with Zack Snyder Directing
____________________________________





Update: February 21, 2016

BATMAN V SUPERMAN Runtime Revealed to Be 2 Hours and 31 Minutes


Batman-v-Superman-IMAX-Behind-the-Scenes-Dragonlord.jpg


It's go big or go home with most blockbusters these days. Supersized budgets, coupled with the need for spectacle, and maximizing the audience dollars means that tentpoles routinely run past two hours, and Zack Snyder is certainly going the extra mile when it comes to Batman v Superman: Dawn Of Justice.

AMC Theaters has revealed that the superhero showdown will keep you in your seat for two hours and thirty-one minutes. That's eight minutes longer than Man Of Steel, nine minutes longer than Avengers: Age Of Ultron, but doesn't reach the mammoth length of Christopher Nolan's 164 minute The Dark Knight Rises.

What does mean for the actual movie? Not much. Either the story works for the length or not, and given that Batman v Superman is expected to cram in not just Wonder Woman, but appearances from other Justice League characters and more, the breathing room seems to make some sense.

Official Runtime For 'Batman v Superman: Dawn Of Justice' Revealed
 
Update: February 17, 2016

Rumor: Warner Bros. "Nervous" About BATMAN V SUPERMAN After Screening

Batman-v-Superman-021716-Dragonlord.jpg


For the past few days, there've been lots of murmurs going around regarding the fact that Warner Bros and DC are starting to get really worried about their upcoming slate of DC films. Why is that? According to Drew McWeeny from HitFix, it's all related to the response the film has been receiving in test screenings.

From Latino-Review's sources, the term "worried" is a mischaracterization. They're not worried, per sé. What they are is nervous, and that's to be expected. After all, there is a lot riding on Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Not only is the fate of an entire slate of DC films hanging in the balance of whether or not this movie hits, but the very definition of "hit" is now coming into question.

The budget for the film, with promotion included, has reportedly ballooned to north of $400 million. So for the movie to be considered a monster success- which the studio needs it to be- and for it to open the floodgates for the rest of the proposed slate, it would need to make north of a billion. The problem is, according to a well-connected source who spoke with LR on a condition of anonymity, the film could be as polarizing as Man of Steel.

To be clear, the source loved Man of Steel. And he's seen Batman v Superman, and he really liked it, too. But he also recalls how that MoS came out and split audiences and critics alike. It wasn't the kind of universal crowd-pleaser that DC wanted then, and that trend may very well continue with BvS.

Again, this isn't to say that the film is bad. Not at all. But it's not for everyone, and that's making the suits nervous, as there's a lot riding on this film and they'd rather it have turned out more accessible.

The idea to include Batman wasn't pre-planned. In fact, the whole Batman Vs Superman angle wasn't cooked up until well after Man of Steel had come out, and it's been said that they didn't decide to include Batman in the film until three days before they announced it at Comic Con. So bringing in The Dark Knight was an impulsive move, and one that was likely aided by the fact that DC knows that audiences love them some Batman.

The one recurring theme coming out of these test screenings, dating back to December, is that Ben Affleck's Batman is the highlight of the film.

But while McWeeny claims this could mean that his solo Batman flick could take the spot of Justice League, as the studio retools the team-up movie and shines a spotlight on the Snyder-less Batman flick, Latino Review's source says that Justice League is absolutely happening next, and that Affleck's solo film will not take its place. Production on JL is ramping up as we speak, and the thought is that they'll start filming after all of the actors are done promoting Batman v Superman. This also contradicts the idea that Snyder might not direct it.


The LR Scoop On The Apparent Turmoil At DC FILMS Over Batman V Superman
 
Update: February 17, 2016

Computer Algorithm Predicts BATMAN V SUPERMAN Has 32% Chance of Being Profitable


Doomsday-Batman-v-Superman-021716-Dragonlord.jpg


With its $200 million budget, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice will be one of the most expensive movies ever made when it’s released next month, and Warner Bros. has a lot riding on its success.

So, studio heads might be a little nervous to know that researchers at the University of Iowa have developed an analytical system that suggests the movie has only a 32 percent probability of turning a profit.

The system was developed by Kang Zhao, a professor of management sciences in the Henry B. Tippie College of Business, and Michael Lash, a doctoral student, to predict the probability of a movie’s profitability at the box office.

Their research has found dozens of elements that factor into a movie’s success, including the people involved in making the film (mostly the stars and director), the plot and genre (horror, rom-com, shoot-'em-up), and when the film was released (summer, when movies draw larger crowds, or late spring, when theaters are at their emptiest).

The system then uses a machine-learning, data-based algorithm to analyze those factors and determine the probability of a film earning a profit of at least $7.3 million, which the researchers considered to a reasonable profit on an investment (a modified version determines the probability of a film earning 11 percent return on investment). They ran the numbers from every film released in the U.S. between 2000 and 2010 through their “who, what, and when” formula to fine-tune which elements played a greater role.

The authors stress that their study looks only at box-office profitability and not tickets sold or revenue generated from video, streaming, or other secondary sources. It also takes into account only those factors that are known prior to the production of the movie.


Predicting Box Office Boffo or Bomb; ‘Batman v. Superman’ Investors Won’t Be Happy
 
Update: February 12, 2016

Rumor: Warner Bros. Worried About Their DC Cinematic Universe?

Justice-League-Fan-Art-021216-Dragonlord.jpg


Hitfix’s Drew McWeeny sat down with Roth Cornet to talk about the last trailer for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and conversation turned to what his sources told him about Warner Bros.’ attitude about the film in particular and the shared DC Cinematic Universe in general.

McWeeny says that Batman v Superman is starting to scare Warner Bros., that the advance response hasn’t been as good as the studio had expected and they are worried.

Warners needs to film to make over $1 billion for the studio to not only make its money back but also to support the rest of the announced films in the DC Cinematic Universe. The response they are getting from test screenings tells them that is not going to happen.

McWeeny bets that Justice League does not start production when it is scheduled, and Zack Snyder will not be at the helm of it when it does.

He also believes Warners will do everything to move Ben Affleck's The Batman solo movie up to take Justice League‘s place, believing that film would act as a better lead in to the team up flick than BvS and a better opportunity to “gain people back” onboard for the rest of the slate.

[Update: Zack Snyder’s Justice League — Part 1 is officially a go at Warner Bros. and will begin filming on April 11, a little over two weeks after the release of Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, the director and studio tell EW.]



Is Warner Bros. Giving Up on Its DC Cinematic Universe?
 
Update: February 11, 2016

Final Trailer for BATMAN V SUPERMAN Saves the Best for Last


Batman-v-Superman-Armored-Batman-032516-Dragonlord.jpg


We're just six weeks away from the superhero fight of the century, and Warner Bros. has whipped anticipation for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice up even further with a new trailer for the DC Comics film. As it's the final trailer in the film's ad campaign, the clip makes the most of its two-minute running time by packing in new shots, new lines, new punches and new voices.

Action, romance, conflict, bravery -- the new Batman v Superman trailer has all of that and more. The trailer may not reveal more about Doomsday's role in the film, but it features more than enough totally new moments to get fans pumped up. A quarter of this trailer is spent showing the veteran Dark Knight at work, busting up windows, crates and criminals in the process, and it establishes the new movie Batman as a force to be reckoned with.

The final moment of the trailer addresses a question everyone has been asking since the title of the film was announced: how does Batman, a human, stand a chance against Superman, a super-powerful Kryptonian? Well, here's your answer -- or at least a hint. We get to see Superman throw a punch at Batman and, somehow, Batman deflects the punch midair.



Final Trailer for Batman v Superman Saves the Best for Last
 
Update: February 1, 2016

Scoot McNairy's Mysterious Role in BATMAN V SUPERMAN Revealed

Scoot-McNairy-Batman-v-Superman-020116-Dragonlord.jpg


The debate over Scoot McNairy's role in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is an old one. From early on in the film's production, leaked set photos showed the actor in green knee-high socks, the kind usually used for digital replacement or deletion.

Early speculation centered around what would replace those green socks. Some thought it would be metal legs revealing McNairy as Metallo, whereas others thought the socks would be used as reference to make his legs a blur (Barry Allen, anyone?).

Latino-Review now has the answer to what is Scoot McNairy's role in the movie. Spoilers below.

The trailers for BvS have shown McNairy's character without shins, and feet bound to a wheelchair. You can see this in the shots by the memorial for the Battle of Metropolis, and when Superman shows up at what looks to be a Senate hearing.

Recently, rumors have resurfaced that McNairy is playing Superman comics character Jimmy Olsen, who was wounded when Superman took on Zod at the end of Man of Steel. While part of that is correct--that the character was injured as a by product of Superman's actions--Scoot McNairy is NOT playing Jimmy Olsen.

According to Latino Review's sources, McNairy's wheelchair-bound character will be brought in to testify against Superman to the U.S. Senate, but also becomes a victim of Lex Luthor's campaign against the Man of Steel. One of Luthor's schemes in the movie involves turning McNairy's character into a human bomb of sorts, radicalizing him, in an attempt to get him close to Superman and to hurt him.

Explosive News on Who Scoot McNairy is Playing in Batman v Superman (Exclusive)
____________________________________





Update: January 22, 2016

Lauren Cohan Cast as Martha Wayne in BATMAN V SUPERMAN

Lauren-Cohan-Batman-v-Superman-Dragonlord.jpg


Lauren Cohan (The Walking Dead, The Boy) seemingly confirms that she is playing Bruce Wayne's ill-fated mother, Martha, in Zack Snyder's Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice. Cohan's name was added to IMDB's cast list for the film and the 34-year old actress retweeted the news via her official Twitter account.

What makes this bit of casting even more interesting is that Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Watchmen) is playing her husband, Thomas Wayne, and he just landed a major role in AMC's The Walking Dead. So, in a twisted way you could say Maggie is married to Negan.

In the film, we'll see a flashback to the pivotal moment in which Thomas and Martha Wayne were murdered in a dark alleyway after taking their son, Bruce, to go see The Mark of Zorro.

The Walking Dead's Lauren Cohan Confirmed As Martha Wayne In Batman v Superman
____________________________________





Update: August 26, 2014

Does Warner Bros. Have a No Joke Policy in Their DC Films?


Man-of-Steel-Cuffs-0128b-Dragonlord.jpg


HitFlix's Drew McWeeny: "'No jokes.' Last week was about the fifth time I've heard that there is a mandate at Warner Bros. regarding any of the DC superhero films in development, and it's very simple and direct and to the point. 'No jokes.'

It would seem like a crazy rule to set for an entire series of films. Not according to Warner/DC. Not after Green Lantern. One thing you'd have to grant Green Lantern, whatever your feelings about it as a movie, is that they've got lots of jokes in that movie. Something has caused this shift in the overall editorial voice of the DC superhero movies. There's got to be a point behind an edict as broad and as specific as that.

DC is going to try for some big characters with Batman and Wonder Woman and The Flash and Cyborg and Aquaman, and one thing that's always seemed true to me of DC comics versus Marvel is tone. DC treats their superhero characters more like gods, fighting battles that we simply can't comprehend or participate in because of our natures. Marvel characters are more flawed, more human, struggling to live human lives while still dealing with their powers and their responsibility to the world.

But if 'No Jokes' is a reaction to Green Lantern, an edict that comes from a desire to simply do things differently from Marvel, it could really paint DC's movies into a corner, and I would imagine that it's giving some filmmakers pause in considering whether or not they'd want to make a DC movie.

So I'm going to put the question out there, and as we all talk to Zack Snyder or David Goyer or any of the actors working on these characters, I'd love to hear an answer, a firm denial. Is it true? Is DC really so gun-shy that they've laid this rule down for all of their films? Is it really a 'No Jokes' future we have to look forward to? And if so, do you think Marvel feels like they've already won in terms of audience sympathy if this is really how things are supposed to move forward?"

Read more at http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captur...arvel-the-big-screen-edge#Cu2f77SwDbRSuf82.99
 
The critics' reviews are very disappointing, especially after the overwhelming positive Twitter reactions yesterday. Thought the film was going to land around 70% score on RT. Oh well, still seeing it this weekend.
 
I hope this doesn't affect Justice League. I still want to see all of them together, regardless of the quality of the film
 
Update: March 22, 2016

First Critics' Reviews for BATMAN V SUPERMAN

Rotten Tomatoes: 41% Approval Rating (10 out of 27 critics like it)

batman-v-superman-justice-league-slice.jpg


Entertainment Weekly - Dawn of Justice starts off as an intriguing meditation about two superheroes turning to an all-too-human emotion: hatred out of fear of the unknown. Two and a half hours later it winds up somewhere very far from that—but at the same time, all too familiar. It's another numbing smash-and-bash orgy of CGI mayhem with an ending that leaves the door open wide enough to justify the next 10 installments. Is it too late to demand a rematch? C+

The Hollywood Reporter - The film may be imposing, but it's not fun. Jesse Eisenberg's Lex Luthor, is so intensely annoying that, very early on, you wish Batman and Superman would just patch up their differences and join forces to put the squirrely rascal out of his, and our, misery. [Rotten]

Empire Magazine - There are moments that make the whole enterprise worthwhile, and introduces an intriguing new Batman. But it’s also cluttered and narratively wonky; a few jokes wouldn’t have gone amiss, either. A climax to a climax, it’s CGI overkill, making for a generic and exhausting denouement. 3/5

Miami Herald - In Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, the Dark Knight and the Man of Steel duke it out and the audience loses. This huge, unwieldy movie is busy and overcrowded. Almost every aspect of the film — from the shoehorning of Wonder Woman, into the plot to pointless cameos by several other fan-favorite DC characters — feels like it was decided in a boardroom instead of a writers’ pen. 2/4

IGN Movies - While Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has good things to recommend it, it’s shortcomings are undeniable. The action sequences whenever Batman is set loose on the bad guys are cool, and the story strives to explore human and philosophical elements, but it’s often not much fun. Even the melodramatic X-Men movies never lost sight of pure entertainment value while also exploring heady and heavy topics. 6.8/10

USA Today - BvS will please those either waiting for the two main players to lock horns on a movie screen, or those who've just been pining for Wonder Woman forever. And for the nerdier crowds, a fleeting glimpse at other superheroes hints this is the Dawn of something potentially sensational. 3/4

Uproxx - Honestly, I can’t remember the last time I was legitimately looking this forward to a movie that I found this dull. I am gobsmacked by just how dull this movie turned out to be. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice so desperately wants to be dark and gritty, it forgets to have any fun. 4/10

Forbes - Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is not a good movie. It offers a truly unengaging Batman and then allows that character to dominate the proceedings while providing a painfully mopey and grim Superman-and-Friends narrative where the only ray of light comes from its homicidal arch-villain. The action scenes get better as they go along, but they aren’t as clean as comprehensible as Man of Steel’s daylight smack downs. 5/10

Daily Telegraph - No major blockbuster in years has been this incoherently structured, this seemingly uninterested in telling a story with clarity and purpose. It grumbles along for what feels like forever, jinking from subplot to subplot, until two shatteringly expensive-looking fights happen back to back, and the whole thing crunches to a halt. 2/5

I'm a Marvel fan boy, but reading this makes even me feel sad.:(:(:(
 
The Justice League franchise just got Amazing Spidermanned.
 
The critics' reviews are very disappointing, especially after the overwhelming positive Twitter reactions yesterday. Thought the film was going to land around 70% score on RT. Oh well, still seeing it this weekend.

And your review is the one we'll all be waiting on.:)
 
Hmm hoping this ends up at least 50+%.

Keep in mind there's going to be over 300 reviews and right now there's only 27 submitted.
 
Oh, well, it could have been worse for DC: the original release date would have put them head to head with Civil War.:)
 
Seems like you either hate it or like it

Typical with zack synder movies honestly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top